[ { "stateCode": "AL", "stateName": "Alabama", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Ala. Code § 12-17-226.6(h) expressly authorizes a Restorative Justice Initiative in any judicial circuit. This is current statewide statutory recognition, although it creates no youth-specific mechanism.", "confidence": "High — current enacted law directly resolves the general-recognition gateway.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0001", "src-0002" ] }, { "stateCode": "AL", "stateName": "Alabama", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "The qualifying statute contains no youth focus, and Alabama's juvenile code names diversion, restitution, and accountability without identifying or fully defining RJ. After the completed enacted-law search, LB2 is 0.", "confidence": "High — the official-code and synonym search found no qualifying youth-specific authority.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0001", "src-0002" ] }, { "stateCode": "AL", "stateName": "Alabama", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB3", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Alabama has general statutory RJ recognition but no operative statewide youth-RJ mechanism whose duration can be classified. LB3 is therefore structurally inapplicable.", "confidence": "High — the calibrated youth-mechanism gateway is not satisfied.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0001", "src-0002" ] }, { "stateCode": "AL", "stateName": "Alabama", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB4", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Because Alabama has no operative statewide youth-RJ mechanism, there is no youth-RJ referral directive to classify. LB4 is Structural N/A/X.", "confidence": "High — the calibrated youth-mechanism gateway is not satisfied.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0001", "src-0003" ] }, { "stateCode": "AL", "stateName": "Alabama", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA1", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "LB2=0; no operative statewide youth-RJ mechanism exists to which an offense-eligibility rule could attach.", "confidence": "High — the live LB2 gateway makes this downstream eligibility field inapplicable.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0004", "src-0005", "src-0006" ] }, { "stateCode": "AL", "stateName": "Alabama", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA2", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "LB2=0; no operative statewide youth-RJ pathway exists to which a prior-contact rule could attach.", "confidence": "High — the live LB2 gateway makes this downstream eligibility field inapplicable.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0004", "src-0005", "src-0006" ] }, { "stateCode": "AL", "stateName": "Alabama", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Current statewide community-corrections law authorizes victim-offender reconciliation programs as a community-based option for adult offenders. This is a new restorative referral option, not merely extended supervision.", "confidence": "High — direct statewide authority/program review under the revised LA3 rule.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0007" ] }, { "stateCode": "AL", "stateName": "Alabama", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA4", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "No Alabama law ties a completion benefit to a statewide youth-RJ pathway because no such pathway exists. LA4 is Structural N/A/X.", "confidence": "High — the calibrated youth-mechanism gateway is not satisfied.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0001", "src-0003" ] }, { "stateCode": "AL", "stateName": "Alabama", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA1", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Accessible statewide court forms and JCC materials identify no explicit state restorative administrator.", "confidence": "High — bounded zero after the packet's completed protocol.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0004", "src-0005", "src-0006" ] }, { "stateCode": "AL", "stateName": "Alabama", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "No formal public state–local body substantively dedicated to qualifying youth restorative justice was located.", "confidence": "Medium — Local JCC panels exist, but they are not a statewide coordination body.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0008", "src-0009", "src-0010" ] }, { "stateCode": "AL", "stateName": "Alabama", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA3", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "The completed state search found no state implementation support tied to a verified qualifying restorative process.", "confidence": "High — bounded zero after the packet's completed protocol.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0004", "src-0005", "src-0006" ] }, { "stateCode": "AL", "stateName": "Alabama", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA4", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "The completed state search found no recurring state monitoring of qualifying restorative programming.", "confidence": "High — bounded zero after the packet's completed protocol.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0004", "src-0005", "src-0006" ] }, { "stateCode": "AL", "stateName": "Alabama", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F1", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "The completed focused state-origin funding protocol found no qualifying award, contract, reimbursement, or allocation.", "confidence": "High — bounded zero after the packet's completed protocol.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0011", "src-0012", "src-0013", "src-0014" ] }, { "stateCode": "AL", "stateName": "Alabama", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Revised F1 is Verified absence/0; therefore F2 is Structural N/A/X. No excluded federal, local, or school-climate funding is reused.", "confidence": "High — revised F1 is 0, so the dependency rule makes this field inapplicable.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0004", "src-0015" ] }, { "stateCode": "AL", "stateName": "Alabama", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F3", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Revised F1 is Verified absence/0; therefore F3 is Structural N/A/X. No excluded funding is used to infer funded geography.", "confidence": "High — revised F1 is 0, so the dependency rule makes this field inapplicable.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0004", "src-0015" ] }, { "stateCode": "AL", "stateName": "Alabama", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "$1.46", "scoreNumeric": 1.46, "reasoning": "FY2025 Title II allocation $766,035 ÷ 526,227 eligible residents ages 10–17 (age 10 fallback because no general statutory minimum was identified) = $1.46 per eligible youth. Full precision is retained for scoring.", "confidence": "High — official FY2025 allocation table, verified jurisdiction ages, and 2024 Census single-year-age estimates.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0016", "src-0017", "src-0018" ] }, { "stateCode": "AL", "stateName": "Alabama", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3%", "scoreNumeric": 0.03, "reasoning": "Verified Juvenile Conference Committee operating locations are in Elmore and Madison counties: 2/67 = 3%.", "confidence": "High — current primary-source evidence supports the stated numerator and denominator.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0011", "src-0012", "src-0013", "src-0014" ] }, { "stateCode": "AL", "stateName": "Alabama", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "10%", "scoreNumeric": 0.1, "reasoning": "Eligible-age population in verified R1 operating-location counties is 50,912 of 526,227 statewide residents ages 10–17, or 9.67%. Provider locations counted: Elmore County, Madison County. Claimed service areas were not substituted for physical operating locations.", "confidence": "High for the population calculation; provider-location completeness inherits the R1 evidence limits and is a conservative verified floor.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0011", "src-0012", "src-0013", "src-0014", "src-0019", "src-0020" ] }, { "stateCode": "AL", "stateName": "Alabama", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "One qualifying functional approach—Juvenile Conference Committees—is verified, despite operation in two counties.", "confidence": "Medium — current provider evidence supports the functional classification.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0011", "src-0012", "src-0013", "src-0014" ] }, { "stateCode": "AL", "stateName": "Alabama", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R4", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "The completed current school-route search did not verify an operational school-linked qualifying restorative diversion or comparable informal route.", "confidence": "High — bounded zero after the packet's completed protocol.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0011", "src-0012", "src-0013", "src-0014" ] }, { "stateCode": "AK", "stateName": "Alaska", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "AS 47.12.450 creates a statewide victim-minor dispute-resolution framework in which both parties negotiate a written settlement and future responsibilities. That is current statutory recognition of a qualifying RJ process.", "confidence": "High — the current statute expressly establishes the qualifying process.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0021", "src-0022" ] }, { "stateCode": "AK", "stateName": "Alaska", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "The controlling provision is a dedicated juvenile-law framework for resolving disputes between victims and minors. Its structure and placement in the juvenile delinquency code establish significant youth focus.", "confidence": "High — youth participation is explicit and central to the statute.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0023", "src-0024" ] }, { "stateCode": "AK", "stateName": "Alaska", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "AS 47.12.450 is a standing codified authorization and contains no pilot term or sunset. The framework is permanent.", "confidence": "High — no sunset or pilot limitation appears in the controlling law.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0025", "src-0026" ] }, { "stateCode": "AK", "stateName": "Alaska", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Alaska permits referral when a community dispute-resolution center is appropriate, but does not require consideration or an offer in every otherwise eligible case. The pathway is discretionary.", "confidence": "High — the controlling referral language is discretionary.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0027" ] }, { "stateCode": "AK", "stateName": "Alaska", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "4", "scoreNumeric": 4, "reasoning": "Statewide law and Delinquency Rule 23(f) permit individualized referrals without broad offense exclusions.", "confidence": "High — current primary legal evidence directly supports this tier.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0028", "src-0029", "src-0030", "src-0031" ] }, { "stateCode": "AK", "stateName": "Alaska", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Accessible statewide authorities establish no meaningful prior-contact rule.", "confidence": "High — bounded zero after the packet's completed protocol.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0028", "src-0029", "src-0030", "src-0031" ] }, { "stateCode": "AK", "stateName": "Alaska", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Alaska Criminal Rule 11(i) authorizes judges in adult criminal cases to refer a case to a restorative justice program, including circle sentencing, family-group conferencing, reparative boards, and victim-offender mediation.", "confidence": "High — direct statewide authority/program review under the revised LA3 rule.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0032" ] }, { "stateCode": "AK", "stateName": "Alaska", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "AS 47.12.040 requires the matter to be closed after successful completion of an informal-adjustment agreement, and that adjustment may include the qualifying dispute-resolution center. The completion benefit is guaranteed case closure.", "confidence": "High — the statute uses mandatory closure language after successful completion.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0033" ] }, { "stateCode": "AK", "stateName": "Alaska", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "DJJ expressly defines its existing statewide role around restorative youth justice.", "confidence": "High — current primary state evidence directly supports this tier.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0028", "src-0029", "src-0030", "src-0031" ] }, { "stateCode": "AK", "stateName": "Alaska", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Alaska has an active statewide juvenile advisory committee and cross-sector restorative-justice convenings, but no current formal public body was verified with youth RJ as a substantive coordinating focus. AJJAC's broad JJDPA mandate and the inactive 2018 workgroup do not qualify.", "confidence": "High — the full official-source and synonym search floor found only broad, inactive, or nonqualifying bodies.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0034", "src-0035", "src-0036" ] }, { "stateCode": "AK", "stateName": "Alaska", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "DJJ supplies policies, statewide materials, and restorative-justice training in counselor preparation.", "confidence": "High — current primary state evidence directly supports this tier.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0028", "src-0029", "src-0030", "src-0031" ] }, { "stateCode": "AK", "stateName": "Alaska", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "Consecutive state grant books publish provider, service-area, and award detail.", "confidence": "High — current primary state evidence directly supports this tier.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0028", "src-0029", "src-0030", "src-0031" ] }, { "stateCode": "AK", "stateName": "Alaska", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "FY2026 Youth Courts/Community Panels awards total $334,500 in General Fund support for state-described accountability-based restorative justice.", "confidence": "High — current primary-source evidence supports the stated numerator and denominator.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0037", "src-0038", "src-0039" ] }, { "stateCode": "AK", "stateName": "Alaska", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "Actual qualifying General Fund awards appear in consecutive FY2025 and FY2026 grant books; this is an annually awarded dedicated grant program.", "confidence": "High — current primary state records support the revised tier.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0040", "src-0041", "src-0042" ] }, { "stateCode": "AK", "stateName": "Alaska", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Eight FY2026 awards span multiple boroughs and census areas, but fewer than 80% of Alaska's 30 county-equivalents.", "confidence": "Medium — multiple funded jurisdictions are verified, but the nearly-all threshold is not met.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0040", "src-0041", "src-0042" ] }, { "stateCode": "AK", "stateName": "Alaska", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "$6.05", "scoreNumeric": 6.05, "reasoning": "FY2025 Title II allocation $486,525 ÷ 80,444 eligible residents ages 10–17 (age 10 fallback because no general statutory minimum was identified) = $6.05 per eligible youth. Full precision is retained for scoring.", "confidence": "High — official FY2025 allocation table, verified jurisdiction ages, and 2024 Census single-year-age estimates.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0016", "src-0043", "src-0044" ] }, { "stateCode": "AK", "stateName": "Alaska", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "30%", "scoreNumeric": 0.3, "reasoning": "A multi-source county-by-county search verifies active physical youth RJ providers in 9 of 30 county-equivalents: eight independently corroborated youth-court locations plus the Fairbanks Community Restorative Justice and Diversion Initiative = 30%.", "confidence": "High — current independent sources establish active physical provider locations in nine county-equivalents.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0045", "src-0046", "src-0047", "src-0048" ] }, { "stateCode": "AK", "stateName": "Alaska", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "85%", "scoreNumeric": 0.85, "reasoning": "Eligible-age population in verified R1 operating-location counties is 68,171 of 80,444 statewide residents ages 10–17, or 84.74%. Provider locations counted: Anchorage Municipality, Chugach Census Area, Fairbanks North Star Borough, Juneau City and Borough, Kenai Peninsula Borough, Ketchikan Gateway Borough, Kodiak Island Borough, Matanuska-Susitna Borough, Nome Census Area. Claimed service areas were not substituted for physical operating locations.", "confidence": "High for the population calculation; provider-location completeness inherits the R1 evidence limits and is a conservative verified floor.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0045", "src-0046", "src-0047", "src-0048", "src-0049", "src-0050" ] }, { "stateCode": "AK", "stateName": "Alaska", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "An independent statewide program-type search verifies at least three distinct youth restorative approaches across multiple providers and jurisdictions: peer/youth courts, Indigenous circle peacemaking, Youth Healing to Wellness Court, and community restorative diversion.", "confidence": "High — current provider and state sources independently verify three or more functional approaches.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0051", "src-0052", "src-0053", "src-0054", "src-0055" ] }, { "stateCode": "AK", "stateName": "Alaska", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "Funded youth courts accept school-district referrals and provide a formal diversion/adjudication substitute.", "confidence": "Medium — current provider evidence supports the functional classification.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0037", "src-0038", "src-0039" ] }, { "stateCode": "AZ", "stateName": "Arizona", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "A.R.S. § 36-2863 expressly recognizes restorative justice as a permitted justice-reinvestment use. This is current statewide statutory recognition, although it is not youth-focused.", "confidence": "High — the term appears expressly in current enacted law.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0056" ] }, { "stateCode": "AZ", "stateName": "Arizona", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Arizona's qualifying current statutory RJ recognition is general and contains no youth focus. Under the live LB2 rubric, no youth mention is scored 0; the gateway applies only to the later youth-design fields.", "confidence": "High — the official-code search floor found no youth focus in the qualifying recognition.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0057", "src-0058" ] }, { "stateCode": "AZ", "stateName": "Arizona", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB3", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "The only qualifying current recognition has no youth focus, so permanence cannot be scored for a youth RJ mechanism. LB3 is structurally inapplicable.", "confidence": "High — the youth-design gateway is not satisfied.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0059", "src-0060" ] }, { "stateCode": "AZ", "stateName": "Arizona", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB4", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Arizona has no qualifying youth RJ mechanism whose offer mandate can be evaluated. LB4 is structurally inapplicable.", "confidence": "High — the youth-design gateway is not satisfied.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0061", "src-0062" ] }, { "stateCode": "AZ", "stateName": "Arizona", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA1", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "LB2 is 0, so the live gateway makes offense eligibility inapplicable.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0063", "src-0064", "src-0065" ] }, { "stateCode": "AZ", "stateName": "Arizona", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA2", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "LB2 is 0, so the live gateway makes prior-contact eligibility inapplicable.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0063", "src-0064", "src-0065" ] }, { "stateCode": "AZ", "stateName": "Arizona", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "The Arizona Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation and Reentry operates a victim-initiated Victim Offender Dialogue program for eligible victims and incarcerated adult offenders.", "confidence": "High — direct statewide authority/program review under the revised LA3 rule.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0066" ] }, { "stateCode": "AZ", "stateName": "Arizona", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA4", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Because Arizona lacks a qualifying youth RJ mechanism, no completion-linked dismissal or sealing benefit can be evaluated. LA4 is structurally inapplicable.", "confidence": "High — the youth-design gateway is not satisfied.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0067", "src-0068" ] }, { "stateCode": "AZ", "stateName": "Arizona", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "The Arizona Department of Juvenile Corrections and its Victims' Rights function expressly assign restorative accountability and harm-repair work to an existing state youth-justice agency.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0063", "src-0064", "src-0065" ] }, { "stateCode": "AZ", "stateName": "Arizona", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Arizona has a formal statewide juvenile-justice commission, but no current body or workgroup was verified with youth RJ as a substantive coordinating focus. Recent minutes mention only a presenter's hope to begin future restorative-justice conversations, which does not establish a qualifying structure.", "confidence": "High — the full official-source and synonym search floor found no qualifying current coordinating body.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0069", "src-0070", "src-0071" ] }, { "stateCode": "AZ", "stateName": "Arizona", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "ADJC publishes current basic program and victim-service implementation references, but no recurring state training or technical-assistance function was verified.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0063", "src-0064", "src-0065" ] }, { "stateCode": "AZ", "stateName": "Arizona", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "Recurring monthly `Just the Facts` reports publish a distinct restorative-justice block with victim-service and restitution measures.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0063", "src-0064", "src-0065" ] }, { "stateCode": "AZ", "stateName": "Arizona", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Arizona appropriated $9,088,500 in FY2025–26 for juvenile diversion consequences through a state fund passed to county probation departments. The statutory mechanism includes identifiable restorative components, but the restorative share is inseparable from broader diversion funding.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0072", "src-0073", "src-0074", "src-0075" ] }, { "stateCode": "AZ", "stateName": "Arizona", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "The qualifying mechanism is a standing statutory fund with a recurring annual state appropriation, not a one-time award.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0072", "src-0073", "src-0074", "src-0075" ] }, { "stateCode": "AZ", "stateName": "Arizona", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "The same state-funded diversion mechanism is passed through to county probation departments and official allocation documentation states that funds are distributed to all counties; a current county-by-county dollar table was not found.", "confidence": "Medium-High — statewide distribution is established, though a current county-level dollar table was not located.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0072", "src-0073", "src-0074", "src-0075", "src-0076" ] }, { "stateCode": "AZ", "stateName": "Arizona", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "$1.25", "scoreNumeric": 1.25, "reasoning": "FY2025 Title II allocation $947,813 ÷ 756,301 eligible residents ages 10–17 (age 10 fallback because no general statutory minimum was identified) = $1.25 per eligible youth. Full precision is retained for scoring.", "confidence": "High — official FY2025 allocation table, verified jurisdiction ages, and 2024 Census single-year-age estimates.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0016", "src-0077", "src-0078" ] }, { "stateCode": "AZ", "stateName": "Arizona", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "47%", "scoreNumeric": 0.47, "reasoning": "A multi-source county-by-county search verifies active physical youth RJ providers in 7 of 15 counties: the five previously documented teen-court counties plus Yavapai County and Santa Cruz County = 47%.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0079", "src-0080", "src-0081", "src-0082", "src-0083", "src-0084", "src-0085", "src-0086", "src-0087", "src-0088", "src-0089" ] }, { "stateCode": "AZ", "stateName": "Arizona", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "91%", "scoreNumeric": 0.91, "reasoning": "Eligible-age population in verified R1 operating-location counties is 686,611 of 756,301 statewide residents ages 10–17, or 90.79%. Provider locations counted: Maricopa County, Mohave County, Navajo County, Pima County, Pinal County, Santa Cruz County, Yavapai County. Claimed service areas were not substituted for physical operating locations.", "confidence": "High for the population calculation; provider-location completeness inherits the R1 evidence limits and is a conservative verified floor.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0079", "src-0080", "src-0081", "src-0082", "src-0083", "src-0084", "src-0085", "src-0086", "src-0087", "src-0088", "src-0089", "src-0090", "src-0091" ] }, { "stateCode": "AZ", "stateName": "Arizona", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "An independent statewide program-type search verifies at least three distinct youth restorative approaches across multiple providers and jurisdictions: peer/teen courts, restorative circles/conferencing/dialogue, and ADJC Victim-Offender Dialogue.", "confidence": "Medium-High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0079", "src-0080", "src-0081", "src-0082", "src-0083", "src-0084", "src-0085", "src-0086", "src-0087", "src-0092" ] }, { "stateCode": "AZ", "stateName": "Arizona", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "Pima Teen Court in Schools and Maricopa Teen Court accept school matters as a formal alternative to exclusion or police/court processing.", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0093", "src-0094", "src-0095", "src-0096", "src-0097", "src-0098", "src-0099" ] }, { "stateCode": "AR", "stateName": "Arkansas", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB1", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Arkansas's current juvenile code contains diversion, teen-court, restitution, and conferencing provisions but neither expressly recognizes RJ nor clearly supplies the qualifying restorative process. The completed enacted-law search supports Verified absence/0.", "confidence": "High — the current juvenile code and enacted-law search directly resolve the gateway.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0100", "src-0101", "src-0102" ] }, { "stateCode": "AR", "stateName": "Arkansas", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Arkansas's completed current enacted-law search found no qualifying youth-specific restorative-justice recognition. LB2's live scale has no X outcome, so the correct classification is Verified absence/0. Because LB2=0, LB3, LB4, and LA1-LA4 remain Structural N/A/X under the live gateway.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0100", "src-0103" ] }, { "stateCode": "AR", "stateName": "Arkansas", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB3", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Arkansas has no qualifying statewide RJ authority whose duration can be classified. LB3 is Structural N/A/X.", "confidence": "High — the legal-recognition gateway is not satisfied.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0100", "src-0103" ] }, { "stateCode": "AR", "stateName": "Arkansas", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB4", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Arkansas's LB1 gateway is 0, so mandate strength for a statewide youth-RJ mechanism cannot be evaluated. LB4 is Structural N/A/X.", "confidence": "High — the legal-recognition gateway is not satisfied.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0100", "src-0101" ] }, { "stateCode": "AR", "stateName": "Arkansas", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA1", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "LB2 is structurally inapplicable because the completed enacted-law search found no qualifying youth-RJ authority.", "confidence": "Medium; the public record supports the minimum tiers but does not isolate current program-level restorative participation", "sourceIds": [ "src-0104", "src-0105", "src-0106", "src-0107" ] }, { "stateCode": "AR", "stateName": "Arkansas", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA2", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "The live LB2 gateway requires X.", "confidence": "Medium; the public record supports the minimum tiers but does not isolate current program-level restorative participation", "sourceIds": [ "src-0104", "src-0105", "src-0106", "src-0107" ] }, { "stateCode": "AR", "stateName": "Arkansas", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA3", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "A completed search of current Arkansas statutes, court materials, corrections programming, and state victim-services materials found no statewide adult referral to a qualifying restorative process. Located restorative provisions were juvenile-, school-, or generic-reentry focused.", "confidence": "Medium-high — direct statewide authority/program review under the revised LA3 rule.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0108", "src-0109" ] }, { "stateCode": "AR", "stateName": "Arkansas", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA4", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Arkansas has no qualifying statewide RJ mechanism to which its generic diversion dismissal or expungement provisions can be tied. LA4 is Structural N/A/X.", "confidence": "High — the legal-recognition gateway is not satisfied.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0100", "src-0101" ] }, { "stateCode": "AR", "stateName": "Arkansas", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Current DYS procurement material expressly states that the state youth-justice agency uses restorative-justice principles in services for youth and families.", "confidence": "Medium; the public record supports the minimum tiers but does not isolate current program-level restorative participation", "sourceIds": [ "src-0104", "src-0105", "src-0106", "src-0107" ] }, { "stateCode": "AR", "stateName": "Arkansas", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "No formal public state–local body substantively dedicated to qualifying youth restorative justice was located.", "confidence": "Medium — Pulaski County Teen Court is local and does not establish a state–local governance body.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0110", "src-0111", "src-0112" ] }, { "stateCode": "AR", "stateName": "Arkansas", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Current DYS procurement/program materials are basic state implementation references; older state solicitations additionally identify youth court, victim-offender mediation, and circles.", "confidence": "Medium; the public record supports the minimum tiers but does not isolate current program-level restorative participation", "sourceIds": [ "src-0104", "src-0105", "src-0106", "src-0107" ] }, { "stateCode": "AR", "stateName": "Arkansas", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "DYS publishes recurring annual statistical reporting for the broader administered youth-justice system, while restorative activity is not separately reported.", "confidence": "Medium; the public record supports the minimum tiers but does not isolate current program-level restorative participation", "sourceIds": [ "src-0104", "src-0105", "src-0106", "src-0107" ] }, { "stateCode": "AR", "stateName": "Arkansas", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F1", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "The only express restorative funding leads are federal Title II solicitations from 2019 and 2022. Current state community-based juvenile contracts do not identify a qualifying restorative component, and no current state-origin restorative award or operating allocation was verified.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0113", "src-0114" ] }, { "stateCode": "AR", "stateName": "Arkansas", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Revised F1 is Verified absence / 0 after the completed state-origin funding search. Under the live dependency rule, F2 is Structural N/A / X; excluded federal, school-only, local-only, generic-diversion, proposed, or out-of-period funding is not reused.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0113", "src-0114" ] }, { "stateCode": "AR", "stateName": "Arkansas", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F3", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Revised F1 is Verified absence / 0 after the completed state-origin funding search. Under the live dependency rule, F3 is Structural N/A / X; excluded federal, school-only, local-only, generic-diversion, proposed, or out-of-period funding is not reused.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0113", "src-0114" ] }, { "stateCode": "AR", "stateName": "Arkansas", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "$1.99", "scoreNumeric": 1.99, "reasoning": "FY2025 Title II allocation $653,328 ÷ 327,809 eligible residents ages 10–17 (statutory minimum age 10) = $1.99 per eligible youth. Full precision is retained for scoring.", "confidence": "High — official FY2025 allocation table, verified jurisdiction ages, and 2024 Census single-year-age estimates.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0016", "src-0115", "src-0116" ] }, { "stateCode": "AR", "stateName": "Arkansas", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1%", "scoreNumeric": 0.01, "reasoning": "1 / 75 = 1.33%", "confidence": "medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0117", "src-0118", "src-0119" ] }, { "stateCode": "AR", "stateName": "Arkansas", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "13%", "scoreNumeric": 0.13, "reasoning": "Eligible-age population in verified R1 operating-location counties is 42,059 of 327,809 statewide residents ages 10–17, or 12.83%. Provider locations counted: Pulaski County. Claimed service areas were not substituted for physical operating locations.", "confidence": "High for the population calculation; provider-location completeness inherits the R1 evidence limits and is a conservative verified floor.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0117", "src-0118", "src-0119", "src-0120", "src-0121" ] }, { "stateCode": "AR", "stateName": "Arkansas", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "One school-based teen-court model is verified.", "confidence": "medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0117", "src-0118", "src-0119" ] }, { "stateCode": "AR", "stateName": "Arkansas", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "Pulaski County and PCSSD currently operate a school-based Teen Court model expressly identified as restorative justice.", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0117", "src-0118", "src-0119" ] }, { "stateCode": "CA", "stateName": "California", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "WIC § 654 expressly authorizes referrals to youth, peer, or teen courts to implement restorative justice practices. California therefore has current statewide legal recognition of RJ.", "confidence": "High — current statutes expressly recognize restorative youth-justice practices.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0122", "src-0123" ] }, { "stateCode": "CA", "stateName": "California", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "California's recognition is embedded in juvenile diversion and a dedicated statewide youth-justice office. This is a significant youth-specific focus.", "confidence": "High — both provisions are expressly youth-specific.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0124", "src-0125" ] }, { "stateCode": "CA", "stateName": "California", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "The statutory authorization and statewide youth-restoration office are standing codified provisions with no pilot term or sunset. The mechanism is permanent.", "confidence": "High — no sunset or temporary limit appears in the controlling statutes.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0126", "src-0127" ] }, { "stateCode": "CA", "stateName": "California", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Section 654 says probation may make a restorative youth-court referral, and § 654.2 likewise uses discretionary language for court-ordered supervision. State law does not require consideration or an offer for all eligible youth.", "confidence": "High — the controlling provisions are expressly discretionary.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0128", "src-0129" ] }, { "stateCode": "CA", "stateName": "California", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "Serious and violent categories are presumptively restricted, but an interests-of-justice override makes selected serious cases eligible.", "confidence": "High — current primary legal evidence directly supports this tier.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0130", "src-0131", "src-0132", "src-0133" ] }, { "stateCode": "CA", "stateName": "California", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Prior diversion or wardship generally disqualifies, subject to an interests-of-justice override.", "confidence": "High — current primary legal evidence directly supports this tier.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0130", "src-0131", "src-0132", "src-0133" ] }, { "stateCode": "CA", "stateName": "California", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "CDCR operates a statewide, victim-initiated Victim Offender Dialogue process with incarcerated adults; the process requires offender accountability and provides an opportunity to make amends.", "confidence": "High — direct statewide authority/program review under the revised LA3 rule.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0134" ] }, { "stateCode": "CA", "stateName": "California", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "4", "scoreNumeric": 4, "reasoning": "Successful § 654.2 supervision requires dismissal, and § 786 requires automatic record sealing upon satisfactory completion. The highest guaranteed statewide benefit is automatic sealing.", "confidence": "High — the statutes use mandatory language for dismissal and sealing.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0135", "src-0136" ] }, { "stateCode": "CA", "stateName": "California", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "OYCR is a dedicated statewide office with an explicit restorative youth-justice role.", "confidence": "High — current primary state evidence directly supports this tier.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0130", "src-0131", "src-0132", "src-0133" ] }, { "stateCode": "CA", "stateName": "California", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "California's Governor-appointed State Advisory Group has a formal Restorative Justice Subcommittee, recent 2025–26 meetings, and geographically and institutionally diverse statewide-local participation. It meets the active formal-body tier.", "confidence": "High — the formal structure, diverse membership, and activity within the last year are publicly documented.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0137", "src-0138" ] }, { "stateCode": "CA", "stateName": "California", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "OYCR and CDE provide recurring resources, webinars, tools, and implementation support.", "confidence": "High — current primary state evidence directly supports this tier.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0130", "src-0131", "src-0132", "src-0133" ] }, { "stateCode": "CA", "stateName": "California", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "BSCC uses recurring provider-level Youth Reinvestment Grant reporting, including participation and outcome evidence.", "confidence": "High — current primary state evidence directly supports this tier.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0130", "src-0131", "src-0132", "src-0133" ] }, { "stateCode": "CA", "stateName": "California", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Current JJCPA/YOBG county funding includes identifiable restorative youth-diversion components, but the restorative share is inseparable.", "confidence": "Medium — qualifying component is identifiable but its amount is inseparable.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0139", "src-0140", "src-0141", "src-0142" ] }, { "stateCode": "CA", "stateName": "California", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "JJCPA/YOBG requires county plans and expenditure reports each fiscal year; it is an annually funded and administered state grant mechanism.", "confidence": "High — current primary state records support the revised tier.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0143", "src-0144" ] }, { "stateCode": "CA", "stateName": "California", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Current descriptions tie qualifying restorative-capable JJCPA/YOBG programming to multiple counties, but not at least 80% of 58 counties.", "confidence": "Medium — multiple funded jurisdictions are verified, but the nearly-all threshold is not met.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0143", "src-0144" ] }, { "stateCode": "CA", "stateName": "California", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "$1.38", "scoreNumeric": 1.38, "reasoning": "FY2025 Title II allocation $4,204,755 ÷ 3,045,336 eligible residents ages 12–17 (statutory minimum age 12) = $1.38 per eligible youth. Full precision is retained for scoring.", "confidence": "High — official FY2025 allocation table, verified jurisdiction ages, and 2024 Census single-year-age estimates.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0016", "src-0145", "src-0146" ] }, { "stateCode": "CA", "stateName": "California", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "24%", "scoreNumeric": 0.24, "reasoning": "Fourteen of 58 counties contain a verified active operating location: 14/58 = 24%.", "confidence": "High — current primary-source evidence supports the stated numerator and denominator.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0139", "src-0140", "src-0141", "src-0142" ] }, { "stateCode": "CA", "stateName": "California", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "44%", "scoreNumeric": 0.44, "reasoning": "Eligible-age population in verified R1 operating-location counties is 1,352,726 of 3,045,336 statewide residents ages 12–17, or 44.42%. Provider locations counted: Alameda County, Butte County, Fresno County, Los Angeles County, Mendocino County, Monterey County, San Francisco County, Santa Barbara County, Santa Clara County, Santa Cruz County, Shasta County, Solano County, Sonoma County, Ventura County. Claimed service areas were not substituted for physical operating locations.", "confidence": "High for the population calculation; provider-location completeness inherits the R1 evidence limits and is a conservative verified floor.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0139", "src-0140", "src-0141", "src-0142", "src-0147", "src-0148" ] }, { "stateCode": "CA", "stateName": "California", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "At least three distinct approaches are independently offered across multiple providers and jurisdictions.", "confidence": "Medium — current provider evidence supports the functional classification.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0139", "src-0140", "src-0141", "src-0142" ] }, { "stateCode": "CA", "stateName": "California", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "Formal school-linked restorative diversion is current in multiple counties.", "confidence": "Medium — current provider evidence supports the functional classification.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0139", "src-0140", "src-0141", "src-0142" ] }, { "stateCode": "CO", "stateName": "Colorado", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Colorado's Children's Code expressly defines restorative justice and integrates it into juvenile diversion. The current enacted statewide recognition satisfies LB1.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0149", "src-0150" ] }, { "stateCode": "CO", "stateName": "Colorado", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Section 19-2.5-402 establishes a statewide juvenile diversion program that integrates restorative justice, prioritizes RJ funding, and requires statewide reporting. The dedicated and substantial youth focus earns 2 points.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0149" ] }, { "stateCode": "CO", "stateName": "Colorado", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Colorado's youth-RJ authority remains codified without a pilot term, sunset, or specified expiration. The operative mechanism is permanent and earns 2 points.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0149" ] }, { "stateCode": "CO", "stateName": "Colorado", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Colorado authorizes juvenile diversion and permits a district attorney to determine RJ suitability, but it does not require RJ consideration or an offer to eligible youth. The referral directive remains discretionary, so LB4 is 0.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0149" ] }, { "stateCode": "CO", "stateName": "Colorado", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "The statewide scheme screens broad cases while routing class 1 and 2 felonies through individualized prosecutorial review.", "confidence": "High — current primary legal evidence directly supports this tier.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0151", "src-0152", "src-0153" ] }, { "stateCode": "CO", "stateName": "Colorado", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "State law delegates prior-contact eligibility criteria to district attorneys without a statewide floor.", "confidence": "High — current primary legal evidence directly supports this tier.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0151", "src-0152", "src-0153" ] }, { "stateCode": "CO", "stateName": "Colorado", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Current Colorado law permits adult criminal defendants to be assessed and referred to restorative justice practices, including victim-offender conferences, as a sentencing alternative or plea recommendation.", "confidence": "High — direct statewide authority/program review under the revised LA3 rule.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0154" ] }, { "stateCode": "CO", "stateName": "Colorado", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "4", "scoreNumeric": 4, "reasoning": "When RJ is used within successful prefiling diversion, Colorado law requires the relevant juvenile records to be expunged without a court order. That automatic completion-linked record protection earns the maximum 4 points.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0149" ] }, { "stateCode": "CO", "stateName": "Colorado", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "A named state restorative function or coordinator oversees the work.", "confidence": "High — current primary state evidence directly supports this tier.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0151", "src-0152", "src-0153" ] }, { "stateCode": "CO", "stateName": "Colorado", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "The state Restorative Justice Council and grant structure bring state and practitioner/local perspectives together, but recent geographically diverse attendance was not fully documented.", "confidence": "Medium — A meeting within the last year with a complete local roster was not located.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0155", "src-0156", "src-0157" ] }, { "stateCode": "CO", "stateName": "Colorado", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "Statutory technical assistance, training, and implementation infrastructure are current and substantial.", "confidence": "High — current primary state evidence directly supports this tier.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0151", "src-0152", "src-0153" ] }, { "stateCode": "CO", "stateName": "Colorado", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "Annual program-level reporting expressly includes restorative referrals.", "confidence": "High — current primary state evidence directly supports this tier.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0151", "src-0152", "src-0153" ] }, { "stateCode": "CO", "stateName": "Colorado", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "State juvenile-diversion funding supports a broader diversion system in which restorative justice is an identifiable authorized component, but the restorative amount is inseparable.", "confidence": "Medium — qualifying component is identifiable but its amount is inseparable.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0158", "src-0159", "src-0160", "src-0014" ] }, { "stateCode": "CO", "stateName": "Colorado", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "DCJ makes Juvenile Diversion allocations each year under a dedicated recurring program containing an explicit restorative component.", "confidence": "High — current primary state records support the revised tier.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0161", "src-0162" ] }, { "stateCode": "CO", "stateName": "Colorado", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "DCJ allocates the qualifying mechanism to every judicial district; all 22 controlling units are funded, exceeding the 80% threshold.", "confidence": "High — current primary state records support the revised tier.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0161", "src-0162" ] }, { "stateCode": "CO", "stateName": "Colorado", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "$1.15", "scoreNumeric": 1.15, "reasoning": "FY2025 Title II allocation $657,314 ÷ 570,924 eligible residents ages 10–17 (statutory minimum age 10) = $1.15 per eligible youth. Full precision is retained for scoring.", "confidence": "High — official FY2025 allocation table, verified jurisdiction ages, and 2024 Census single-year-age estimates.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0016", "src-0163", "src-0164" ] }, { "stateCode": "CO", "stateName": "Colorado", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "16%", "scoreNumeric": 0.16, "reasoning": "The current statewide Restorative Justice Colorado directory was fully enumerated (76 of 76 profiles) and filtered to Youth ages 10-17 plus Juvenile specific offenses (20 profiles). Profile-level review verified current restorative case activity, youth/offense applicability, harmed-party participation, and an in-person operating base in nine unambiguous counties: Boulder, Chaffee, Conejos, Denver, El Paso, Garfield, Gunnison, La Plata, and Larimer. The independently verified current Center for Restorative Programs location adds Alamosa County. The deduplicated provider-location set is therefore 10 of 64 county-equivalents: 15.625%, rounded to 16%. This is geographic presence/proximity, not a claim of countywide eligibility or access.", "confidence": "Medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0165", "src-0166" ] }, { "stateCode": "CO", "stateName": "Colorado", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "37%", "scoreNumeric": 0.37, "reasoning": "Eligible-age population in verified R1 operating-location counties is 210,602 of 570,924 statewide residents ages 10–17, or 36.89%. Provider locations counted: Alamosa County, Boulder County, Chaffee County, Conejos County, Denver County, El Paso County, Garfield County, Gunnison County, La Plata County, Larimer County. Claimed service areas were not substituted for physical operating locations.", "confidence": "High for the population calculation; provider-location completeness inherits the R1 evidence limits and is a conservative verified floor.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0165", "src-0166", "src-0167", "src-0168" ] }, { "stateCode": "CO", "stateName": "Colorado", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "Current approaches include victim-offender dialogue, restorative circles, conferencing, and school-based practices across providers.", "confidence": "Medium — current provider evidence supports the functional classification.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0158", "src-0159", "src-0160", "src-0014" ] }, { "stateCode": "CO", "stateName": "Colorado", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "CRP accepts school-official referrals into formal restorative diversion; current school-linked programming is operational.", "confidence": "Medium — current provider evidence supports the functional classification.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0158", "src-0159", "src-0160", "src-0014" ] }, { "stateCode": "CT", "stateName": "Connecticut", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Connecticut law requires juvenile programs to incorporate restorative principles and practices. That express current statewide statutory recognition satisfies LB1.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0169" ] }, { "stateCode": "CT", "stateName": "Connecticut", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "The restorative-practices clause is expressly youth-specific but is one objective within a broader juvenile-services statute rather than a dedicated RJ law. That brief/general youth provision earns 1 point.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0169" ] }, { "stateCode": "CT", "stateName": "Connecticut", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Section 46b-121h remains codified without a pilot term, sunset, or expiration. Connecticut's youth-RJ authority is permanent and earns 2 points.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0169" ] }, { "stateCode": "CT", "stateName": "Connecticut", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Connecticut mandates that the system maintain programs incorporating restorative practices, but it does not require case decision-makers to consider or offer RJ to legally eligible youth. Case referral remains discretionary, so LB4 is 0.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0169" ] }, { "stateCode": "CT", "stateName": "Connecticut", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "The statewide restorative-practices mandate contains no meaningful offense-eligibility rule; completed-search silence is 0.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0169", "src-0170", "src-0171" ] }, { "stateCode": "CT", "stateName": "Connecticut", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "The controlling law contains no meaningful statewide prior-contact rule; completed-search silence is 0.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0169", "src-0170", "src-0171" ] }, { "stateCode": "CT", "stateName": "Connecticut", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA3", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Current official materials do not establish a statewide adult RJ referral pathway. The 2022 Hate Crimes Advisory Council reported restorative approaches were then limited to juvenile residential/community use and recommended creating adult pilots; the 2026 DOC program compendium does not list a qualifying adult dialogue process.", "confidence": "High — direct statewide authority/program review under the revised LA3 rule.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0172", "src-0173" ] }, { "stateCode": "CT", "stateName": "Connecticut", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA4", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Connecticut's restorative-practices provision creates no completion-linked dismissal or record benefit, and no current statewide law tying such a benefit to this pathway was found. LA4 is 0.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0169" ] }, { "stateCode": "CT", "stateName": "Connecticut", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "DCF and the JJPOC diversion structure have an explicit restorative/diversion role within existing state youth-justice administration.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0169", "src-0170", "src-0171" ] }, { "stateCode": "CT", "stateName": "Connecticut", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "The active JJPOC Diversion Workgroup formally joins state and local actors and publishes current statewide youth-diversion policy and implementation records.", "confidence": "High — The workgroup covers diversion broadly, though restorative practice is a substantive implementation component.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0174", "src-0175", "src-0176" ] }, { "stateCode": "CT", "stateName": "Connecticut", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "State records document large-scale restorative-practice training, statewide diversion policy materials, and regional Youth Diversion Team implementation.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0169", "src-0170", "src-0171" ] }, { "stateCode": "CT", "stateName": "Connecticut", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "4", "scoreNumeric": 4, "reasoning": "Recurring JJPOC reporting evaluates statewide diversion implementation and produces formal recommendations.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0169", "src-0170", "src-0171" ] }, { "stateCode": "CT", "stateName": "Connecticut", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F1", "status": "unknown", "statusLabel": "Unknown", "scoreDisplay": "M", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Connecticut's 2025 Diversion First RFP would create three state contracts for a statewide restorative Youth Diversion Team model. The procurement closed in October 2025, but the reviewed state contracting sources did not identify the selected providers or executed contracts as of the cutoff. The RFP cannot be treated as an award, while its age makes a simple absence score unsafe. F1 remains a true M.", "confidence": "Medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0177" ] }, { "stateCode": "CT", "stateName": "Connecticut", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F2", "status": "unknown", "statusLabel": "Unknown", "scoreDisplay": "M", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "The 2025 Diversion First procurement has no verified executed awards. Without qualifying F1 funding, but with final status still unresolved rather than absent, neither recurrence nor funded geography can be determined.", "confidence": "Medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0177" ] }, { "stateCode": "CT", "stateName": "Connecticut", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F3", "status": "unknown", "statusLabel": "Unknown", "scoreDisplay": "M", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "The 2025 Diversion First procurement has no verified executed awards. Without qualifying F1 funding, but with final status still unresolved rather than absent, neither recurrence nor funded geography can be determined.", "confidence": "Medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0177" ] }, { "stateCode": "CT", "stateName": "Connecticut", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "$0.00", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "FY2025 Title II allocation $0 ÷ 346,496 eligible residents ages 10–17 (statutory minimum age 10) = $0.00 per eligible youth. Full precision is retained for scoring. The $0 value follows the controlling FY2025 table and denotes nonparticipation for this allocation, not absence of every possible federal funding source.", "confidence": "High — official FY2025 allocation table, verified jurisdiction ages, and 2024 Census single-year-age estimates.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0016", "src-0178", "src-0179", "src-0180" ] }, { "stateCode": "CT", "stateName": "Connecticut", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "100%", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "9 / 9 = 100%", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0181", "src-0182", "src-0183", "src-0184", "src-0185" ] }, { "stateCode": "CT", "stateName": "Connecticut", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "100%", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Eligible-age population in verified R1 operating-location counties is 346,496 of 346,496 statewide residents ages 10–17, or 100.00%. Provider locations counted: all county-equivalents. Claimed service areas were not substituted for physical operating locations.", "confidence": "High for the population calculation; provider-location completeness inherits the R1 evidence limits and is a conservative verified floor.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0181", "src-0182", "src-0183", "src-0184", "src-0185", "src-0186", "src-0187" ] }, { "stateCode": "CT", "stateName": "Connecticut", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "The statewide standardized YDT/JRB restorative meeting is the dominant approach; Catalyst also independently operates youth mediation, but that added approach is concentrated in Bridgeport.", "confidence": "medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0181", "src-0182", "src-0183", "src-0184", "src-0185" ] }, { "stateCode": "CT", "stateName": "Connecticut", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "YDTs accept school/SRO referrals and formally divert eligible cases from juvenile court; Catalyst also documents school restorative interventions replacing punitive responses.", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0181", "src-0182", "src-0183", "src-0184", "src-0185" ] }, { "stateCode": "DE", "stateName": "Delaware", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Title 11, Chapter 95 establishes victim-offender mediation for criminal and juvenile delinquency matters, and § 703 separately recognizes school restorative practices. Delaware has current statewide legal recognition of a qualifying RJ process.", "confidence": "High — current statutes expressly authorize qualifying restorative processes.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0188", "src-0189" ] }, { "stateCode": "DE", "stateName": "Delaware", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Delaware expressly applies victim-offender mediation to juvenile delinquency and separately codifies restorative practices for public-school youth. Together these provisions establish significant youth focus.", "confidence": "High — youth application is explicit in two current statewide provisions.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0190", "src-0191" ] }, { "stateCode": "DE", "stateName": "Delaware", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Chapter 95 is a standing codified framework and contains no pilot limit or sunset. Delaware's legal mechanism is permanent.", "confidence": "High — no temporary authorization or sunset appears in the controlling law.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0192" ] }, { "stateCode": "DE", "stateName": "Delaware", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Chapter 95 leaves eligibility certification and referral discretionary and does not require consideration or an offer in every otherwise eligible juvenile matter. The pathway is discretionary.", "confidence": "High — the controlling statute creates no required-consideration or required-offer rule.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0193" ] }, { "stateCode": "DE", "stateName": "Delaware", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "4", "scoreNumeric": 4, "reasoning": "Chapter 95 covers felony, misdemeanor, and juvenile-delinquency cases through individualized Attorney General certification.", "confidence": "High — current primary legal evidence directly supports this tier.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0194", "src-0195", "src-0196" ] }, { "stateCode": "DE", "stateName": "Delaware", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "The completed search found no meaningful statewide prior-contact restriction.", "confidence": "High — bounded zero after the packet's completed protocol.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0194", "src-0195", "src-0196" ] }, { "stateCode": "DE", "stateName": "Delaware", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Title 11, Chapter 95 establishes state-administered victim-offender alternative case resolution for felony, misdemeanor, and juvenile offenses before or after adjudication; adult cases necessarily include ages 18–25.", "confidence": "High — direct statewide authority/program review under the revised LA3 rule.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0197" ] }, { "stateCode": "DE", "stateName": "Delaware", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Chapter 95 does not guarantee dismissal, expungement, or sealing after successful mediation. Because no statewide completion-linked guarantee was found, LA4 is 0.", "confidence": "High — no completion-linked guarantee appears in the controlling statutes.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0198", "src-0199" ] }, { "stateCode": "DE", "stateName": "Delaware", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "State law creates a dedicated multi-agency Victim-Offender Alternative Case Resolution Committee.", "confidence": "High — current primary state evidence directly supports this tier.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0194", "src-0195", "src-0196" ] }, { "stateCode": "DE", "stateName": "Delaware", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Delaware's formal Juvenile Justice Advisory Group has state, local, public, and youth representation, and consecutive reports document substantive restorative-justice programming in all three counties. This supports meaningful joint representation, but no public meeting within the last year was verified, so tier 3 is not met.", "confidence": "Medium — representation and substantive work are clear, but current meeting activity was not publicly verified.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0200", "src-0201", "src-0202" ] }, { "stateCode": "DE", "stateName": "Delaware", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Current contracts, trained-mediator requirements, and implementation reports are verified, but recurring technical assistance is not.", "confidence": "High — current primary state evidence directly supports this tier.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0194", "src-0195", "src-0196" ] }, { "stateCode": "DE", "stateName": "Delaware", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "4", "scoreNumeric": 4, "reasoning": "Recurring JJAG reports include provider activity and formal recommendations.", "confidence": "High — current primary state evidence directly supports this tier.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0194", "src-0195", "src-0196" ] }, { "stateCode": "DE", "stateName": "Delaware", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "The state-funded School Offense Diversion Program is a qualifying restorative alternative to juvenile court and punitive school discipline.", "confidence": "High — current primary-source evidence supports the stated numerator and denominator.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0203", "src-0204", "src-0039" ] }, { "stateCode": "DE", "stateName": "Delaware", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F2", "status": "unknown", "statusLabel": "Unknown", "scoreDisplay": "M", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "The state-funded SoDP resolves F1, but no actual annual state appropriation, award, or payment cycle for that same mechanism was verified.", "confidence": "Low — actual annual awards or payment cycles for the qualifying mechanism remain unverified.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0205", "src-0206" ] }, { "stateCode": "DE", "stateName": "Delaware", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "The verified state-funded SoDP operates in New Castle County; the record does not tie Kent or Sussex programs to the same funding mechanism.", "confidence": "High — current primary state records support the revised tier.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0205", "src-0206" ] }, { "stateCode": "DE", "stateName": "Delaware", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "$6.38", "scoreNumeric": 6.38, "reasoning": "FY2025 Title II allocation $485,413 ÷ 76,054 eligible residents ages 12–17 (statutory minimum age 12) = $6.38 per eligible youth. Full precision is retained for scoring.", "confidence": "High — official FY2025 allocation table, verified jurisdiction ages, and 2024 Census single-year-age estimates.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0016", "src-0207", "src-0208" ] }, { "stateCode": "DE", "stateName": "Delaware", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "100%", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "DCJ in New Castle and People’s Place/Center for Community Justice in Kent and Sussex establish 3/3 counties: 100%.", "confidence": "High — current primary-source evidence supports the stated numerator and denominator.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0203", "src-0204", "src-0039" ] }, { "stateCode": "DE", "stateName": "Delaware", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "100%", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Eligible-age population in verified R1 operating-location counties is 76,054 of 76,054 statewide residents ages 12–17, or 100.00%. Provider locations counted: all county-equivalents. Claimed service areas were not substituted for physical operating locations.", "confidence": "High for the population calculation; provider-location completeness inherits the R1 evidence limits and is a conservative verified floor.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0203", "src-0204", "src-0039", "src-0209", "src-0210" ] }, { "stateCode": "DE", "stateName": "Delaware", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Current qualifying services form one functional approach family: restorative conferencing/victim-offender mediation.", "confidence": "Medium — current provider evidence supports the functional classification.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0203", "src-0204", "src-0039" ] }, { "stateCode": "DE", "stateName": "Delaware", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "SoDP is a current formal school-offense diversion route with restorative conferencing and accountability agreements.", "confidence": "Medium — current provider evidence supports the functional classification.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0203", "src-0204", "src-0039" ] }, { "stateCode": "FL", "stateName": "Florida", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Florida's Juvenile Justice Code expressly establishes Neighborhood Restorative Justice Centers and Boards. That current enacted statewide recognition satisfies LB1.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0211" ] }, { "stateCode": "FL", "stateName": "Florida", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Section 985.155 is a dedicated youth-RJ law defining eligible juvenile offenders, boards, referral, affected-party participation, accountability, repair, and completion. Its significant youth focus earns 2 points.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0211" ] }, { "stateCode": "FL", "stateName": "Florida", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Section 985.155 remains permanently codified and contains no pilot term, sunset, or expiration. Florida's youth-RJ authority earns 2 points.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0211" ] }, { "stateCode": "FL", "stateName": "Florida", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Florida permits a state attorney to establish a center and refer an eligible youth, but does not require consideration or an offer. Referral is entirely discretionary, so LB4 is 0.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0211" ] }, { "stateCode": "FL", "stateName": "Florida", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Section 985.155 limits the qualifying process to nonviolent youth.", "confidence": "High — current primary legal evidence directly supports this tier.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0212", "src-0213" ] }, { "stateCode": "FL", "stateName": "Florida", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Section 985.155 limits the qualifying process to first-time youth.", "confidence": "High — current primary legal evidence directly supports this tier.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0212", "src-0213" ] }, { "stateCode": "FL", "stateName": "Florida", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA3", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "A completed current search found juvenile neighborhood restorative justice and generic adult diversion, but no operating statewide adult pathway with the required affected-party participation, accountability, acknowledgment of harm, and repair. Recent state budget materials describe VOD as a requested expansion rather than an established statewide service.", "confidence": "Medium-high — direct statewide authority/program review under the revised LA3 rule.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0214", "src-0215" ] }, { "stateCode": "FL", "stateName": "Florida", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Successful completion requires the state attorney not to file a juvenile-court petition. The rubric treats guaranteed nonfiling as dismissal, so this earns 2 points; no automatic RJ-linked sealing benefit was verified.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0211" ] }, { "stateCode": "FL", "stateName": "Florida", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA1", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Implementation is delegated to circuit-level state attorneys and local boards; no explicit statewide restorative administrator was verified.", "confidence": "High — bounded zero after the packet's completed protocol.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0212", "src-0213" ] }, { "stateCode": "FL", "stateName": "Florida", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Florida's official review found no formal statewide council or coordinating body dedicated to youth restorative justice.", "confidence": "High — Local boards and programs do not constitute a state–local governance body.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0216", "src-0217", "src-0218" ] }, { "stateCode": "FL", "stateName": "Florida", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA3", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "The completed search found no current statewide restorative implementation-support function.", "confidence": "High — bounded zero after the packet's completed protocol.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0212", "src-0213" ] }, { "stateCode": "FL", "stateName": "Florida", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA4", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "The completed search found no recurring public statewide monitoring of the qualifying process.", "confidence": "High — bounded zero after the packet's completed protocol.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0212", "src-0213" ] }, { "stateCode": "FL", "stateName": "Florida", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F1", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "The completed focused state-origin funding protocol found no qualifying state award, contract, reimbursement, or allocation.", "confidence": "High — bounded zero after the packet's completed protocol.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0212", "src-0219", "src-0220", "src-0014" ] }, { "stateCode": "FL", "stateName": "Florida", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Revised F1 is Verified absence/0; therefore F2 is Structural N/A/X. No excluded federal, local, or school-climate funding is reused.", "confidence": "High — revised F1 is 0, so the dependency rule makes this field inapplicable.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0212", "src-0219" ] }, { "stateCode": "FL", "stateName": "Florida", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F3", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Revised F1 is Verified absence/0; therefore F3 is Structural N/A/X. No excluded funding is used to infer funded geography.", "confidence": "High — revised F1 is 0, so the dependency rule makes this field inapplicable.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0212", "src-0219" ] }, { "stateCode": "FL", "stateName": "Florida", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "$0.81", "scoreNumeric": 0.81, "reasoning": "FY2025 Title II allocation $2,308,518 ÷ 2,858,428 eligible residents ages 7–17 (statutory minimum age 7) = $0.81 per eligible youth. Full precision is retained for scoring.", "confidence": "High — official FY2025 allocation table, verified jurisdiction ages, and 2024 Census single-year-age estimates.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0016", "src-0221", "src-0222" ] }, { "stateCode": "FL", "stateName": "Florida", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "4%", "scoreNumeric": 0.04, "reasoning": "Verified operating locations are in Bradford, Orange, and Palm Beach counties: 3/67 = 4%.", "confidence": "High — current primary-source evidence supports the stated numerator and denominator.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0212", "src-0219", "src-0220", "src-0014" ] }, { "stateCode": "FL", "stateName": "Florida", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "14%", "scoreNumeric": 0.14, "reasoning": "Eligible-age population in verified R1 operating-location counties is 392,706 of 2,858,428 statewide residents ages 7–17, or 13.74%. Provider locations counted: Bradford County, Orange County, Palm Beach County. Claimed service areas were not substituted for physical operating locations.", "confidence": "High for the population calculation; provider-location completeness inherits the R1 evidence limits and is a conservative verified floor.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0212", "src-0219", "src-0220", "src-0014", "src-0223", "src-0224" ] }, { "stateCode": "FL", "stateName": "Florida", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Neighborhood accountability conferencing and youth/teen court are independently offered across multiple counties/providers.", "confidence": "Medium — current provider evidence supports the functional classification.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0212", "src-0219", "src-0220", "src-0014" ] }, { "stateCode": "FL", "stateName": "Florida", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "Palm Beach County's school-district Youth Court is an operational formal diversion route for school-related cases.", "confidence": "Medium — current provider evidence supports the functional classification.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0212", "src-0219", "src-0220", "src-0014" ] }, { "stateCode": "GA", "stateName": "Georgia", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB1", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Georgia's current juvenile and restitution statutes emphasize accountability, rehabilitation, diversion, and restitution but neither expressly recognize RJ nor clearly establish the required affected-party, acknowledgment, and repair process. The completed enacted-law search therefore supports Verified absence/0.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0225", "src-0226" ] }, { "stateCode": "GA", "stateName": "Georgia", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Georgia's completed current enacted-law search found no qualifying youth-specific restorative-justice recognition. LB2's live scale has no X outcome, so the correct classification is Verified absence/0. Because LB2=0, LB3, LB4, and LA1-LA4 remain Structural N/A/X under the live gateway.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0225" ] }, { "stateCode": "GA", "stateName": "Georgia", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB3", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Georgia's LB1 gateway is 0, so duration cannot be assessed for a nonexistent statewide youth-RJ authority. LB3 is Structural N/A/X.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0225" ] }, { "stateCode": "GA", "stateName": "Georgia", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB4", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Georgia's LB1 gateway is 0, so referral-directive strength for a statewide youth-RJ mechanism cannot be evaluated. LB4 is Structural N/A/X.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0225" ] }, { "stateCode": "GA", "stateName": "Georgia", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA1", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "LB2 is structurally inapplicable after the completed current-law search found no qualifying youth-RJ authority.", "confidence": "High for GA1/GA3; Medium for GA4", "sourceIds": [ "src-0227", "src-0228" ] }, { "stateCode": "GA", "stateName": "Georgia", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA2", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "The live gateway requires X.", "confidence": "High for GA1/GA3; Medium for GA4", "sourceIds": [ "src-0227", "src-0228" ] }, { "stateCode": "GA", "stateName": "Georgia", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "The Georgia State Board of Pardons and Paroles operates a statewide, victim-initiated Victim Offender Dialogue program for violent crimes; offenders must acknowledge their role and participate voluntarily.", "confidence": "High — direct statewide authority/program review under the revised LA3 rule.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0229" ] }, { "stateCode": "GA", "stateName": "Georgia", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA4", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Georgia has no qualifying statewide youth-RJ pathway to which a completion benefit could attach. LA4 is Structural N/A/X.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0225" ] }, { "stateCode": "GA", "stateName": "Georgia", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "The CJCC Juvenile Justice Unit expressly funds and coordinates youth programming grounded in restorative accountability.", "confidence": "High for GA1/GA3; Medium for GA4", "sourceIds": [ "src-0227", "src-0228" ] }, { "stateCode": "GA", "stateName": "Georgia", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "No formal public state–local body substantively dedicated to qualifying youth restorative justice was located.", "confidence": "Medium — CJCC stakeholder coordination is an agency function, not a distinct formal body meeting GA2.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0230", "src-0231", "src-0232" ] }, { "stateCode": "GA", "stateName": "Georgia", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "CJCC supplies recurring grant guidance and technical assistance and its rules expressly include restorative-justice programming.", "confidence": "High for GA1/GA3; Medium for GA4", "sourceIds": [ "src-0227", "src-0228" ] }, { "stateCode": "GA", "stateName": "Georgia", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Grant rules require quarterly and final reporting, but public results do not separately identify restorative activity.", "confidence": "High for GA1/GA3; Medium for GA4", "sourceIds": [ "src-0227", "src-0228" ] }, { "stateCode": "GA", "stateName": "Georgia", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F1", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Georgia's Juvenile Justice Incentive Grant Program funds community alternatives but the current official award materials do not identify a restorative component. Current local qualifying providers are not linked to a state-origin award or contract. The completed protocol therefore supports 0.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0233", "src-0234" ] }, { "stateCode": "GA", "stateName": "Georgia", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Revised F1 is Verified absence / 0 after the completed state-origin funding search. Under the live dependency rule, F2 is Structural N/A / X; excluded federal, school-only, local-only, generic-diversion, proposed, or out-of-period funding is not reused.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0233", "src-0234" ] }, { "stateCode": "GA", "stateName": "Georgia", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F3", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Revised F1 is Verified absence / 0 after the completed state-origin funding search. Under the live dependency rule, F3 is Structural N/A / X; excluded federal, school-only, local-only, generic-diversion, proposed, or out-of-period funding is not reused.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0233", "src-0234" ] }, { "stateCode": "GA", "stateName": "Georgia", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "$1.35", "scoreNumeric": 1.35, "reasoning": "FY2025 Title II allocation $1,416,039 ÷ 1,045,947 eligible residents ages 10–16 (age 10 fallback because no general statutory minimum was identified) = $1.35 per eligible youth. Full precision is retained for scoring.", "confidence": "High — official FY2025 allocation table, verified jurisdiction ages, and 2024 Census single-year-age estimates.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0016", "src-0235", "src-0236" ] }, { "stateCode": "GA", "stateName": "Georgia", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1%", "scoreNumeric": 0.01, "reasoning": "2 / 159 = 1.26%", "confidence": "medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0237", "src-0238", "src-0239", "src-0240", "src-0241" ] }, { "stateCode": "GA", "stateName": "Georgia", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3%", "scoreNumeric": 0.03, "reasoning": "Eligible-age population in verified R1 operating-location counties is 31,996 of 1,045,947 statewide residents ages 10–16, or 3.06%. Provider locations counted: Chatham County, Clarke County. Claimed service areas were not substituted for physical operating locations.", "confidence": "High for the population calculation; provider-location completeness inherits the R1 evidence limits and is a conservative verified floor.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0237", "src-0238", "src-0239", "src-0240", "src-0241", "src-0242", "src-0243" ] }, { "stateCode": "GA", "stateName": "Georgia", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Georgia Conflict Center operates facilitated diversion/conferencing in Clarke County, while Deep Center operates a distinct restorative, healing-centered youth model in Chatham County.", "confidence": "medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0237", "src-0238", "src-0239", "src-0240", "src-0241" ] }, { "stateCode": "GA", "stateName": "Georgia", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Current school implementations use restorative responses, accountability, apology, and relationship repair, but no verified formal school referral route substitutes court processing.", "confidence": "medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0237", "src-0238", "src-0239", "src-0240", "src-0241" ] }, { "stateCode": "HI", "stateName": "Hawaii", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Hawaii law expressly lists participation in a restorative justice program as a permissible juvenile informal-adjustment method and describes a child, supporters, victim, and victim supporters meeting. That current enacted recognition satisfies LB1.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0244", "src-0245" ] }, { "stateCode": "HI", "stateName": "Hawaii", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "HRS § 571-31.4 expressly applies RJ to child law violators but places it as one option within a broader informal-adjustment statute rather than a dedicated youth-RJ framework. The brief youth-specific provision earns 1 point.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0244" ] }, { "stateCode": "HI", "stateName": "Hawaii", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "The youth-RJ provision enacted in 2013 remains codified without a pilot term, sunset, or expiration. Hawaii's authority is permanent and earns 2 points.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0244", "src-0245" ] }, { "stateCode": "HI", "stateName": "Hawaii", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Hawaii permits informal adjustment to include RJ, but neither the intake officer nor court must consider or offer RJ to an eligible youth. The operative directive is discretionary, so LB4 is 0.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0244" ] }, { "stateCode": "HI", "stateName": "Hawaii", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Section 571-31.4 expressly delegates offense-eligibility frameworks to each circuit's court administrators without statewide criteria.", "confidence": "High — current primary legal evidence directly supports this tier.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0246", "src-0247", "src-0248" ] }, { "stateCode": "HI", "stateName": "Hawaii", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "The same law expressly delegates prior-contact eligibility locally without a statewide floor.", "confidence": "High — current primary legal evidence directly supports this tier.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0246", "src-0247", "src-0248" ] }, { "stateCode": "HI", "stateName": "Hawaii", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA3", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Completed current-law and agency searches found historical/local restorative reentry circles and multiple proposed statewide bills, but no current statewide statute, binding rule, or state-administered adult referral pathway. The recurring proposals to establish a statewide program did not become current law.", "confidence": "High — direct statewide authority/program review under the revised LA3 rule.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0249", "src-0250" ] }, { "stateCode": "HI", "stateName": "Hawaii", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA4", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Hawaii's RJ option does not guarantee dismissal, nonfiling, sealing, or expungement after completion, and no current statewide completion-linked benefit was found. LA4 is 0.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0244", "src-0245" ] }, { "stateCode": "HI", "stateName": "Hawaii", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "State Family Court administrators have an explicit statutory restorative role.", "confidence": "High — current primary state evidence directly supports this tier.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0246", "src-0247", "src-0248" ] }, { "stateCode": "HI", "stateName": "Hawaii", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "No current formal public state–local body substantively dedicated to youth restorative justice was located.", "confidence": "Medium — Historical Judiciary resolutions and proposed legislation do not establish an active coordinating body.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0251", "src-0252", "src-0253" ] }, { "stateCode": "HI", "stateName": "Hawaii", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA3", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Current Judiciary and OYS searches found no restorative-specific state forms, tools, training, or implementation references.", "confidence": "High — bounded zero after the packet's completed protocol.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0246", "src-0247", "src-0248" ] }, { "stateCode": "HI", "stateName": "Hawaii", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA4", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Current Judiciary and OYS searches found no recurring restorative-specific monitoring.", "confidence": "High — bounded zero after the packet's completed protocol.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0246", "src-0247", "src-0248" ] }, { "stateCode": "HI", "stateName": "Hawaii", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F1", "status": "unknown", "statusLabel": "Unknown", "scoreDisplay": "M", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Current planning and procurement materials show plausible state support, but no final executed state-origin award or allocation was verified.", "confidence": "Low — plausible support, but a final executed state award/allocation was not verified.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0254", "src-0255", "src-0039", "src-0256" ] }, { "stateCode": "HI", "stateName": "Hawaii", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F2", "status": "unknown", "statusLabel": "Unknown", "scoreDisplay": "M", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Revised F1 is Unknown/M; recurrence cannot be scored from procurement requests, plans, or proposed funding.", "confidence": "Low — actual annual awards or payment cycles for the qualifying mechanism remain unverified.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0257", "src-0258" ] }, { "stateCode": "HI", "stateName": "Hawaii", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F3", "status": "unknown", "statusLabel": "Unknown", "scoreDisplay": "M", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Revised F1 is Unknown/M; funded geography cannot be scored from proposed service areas.", "confidence": "Low — no final funded-jurisdiction roster for the qualifying mechanism was verified.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0257", "src-0258" ] }, { "stateCode": "HI", "stateName": "Hawaii", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "$6.37", "scoreNumeric": 6.37, "reasoning": "FY2025 Title II allocation $627,595 ÷ 98,519 eligible residents ages 12–17 (statutory minimum age 12) = $6.37 per eligible youth. Full precision is retained for scoring.", "confidence": "High — official FY2025 allocation table, verified jurisdiction ages, and 2024 Census single-year-age estimates.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0016", "src-0259", "src-0260" ] }, { "stateCode": "HI", "stateName": "Hawaii", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "20%", "scoreNumeric": 0.2, "reasoning": "Hale Opio's active Family Conferencing program has an operating location on Kauai: 1/5 = 20%.", "confidence": "High — current primary-source evidence supports the stated numerator and denominator.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0254", "src-0255", "src-0039", "src-0256" ] }, { "stateCode": "HI", "stateName": "Hawaii", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "6%", "scoreNumeric": 0.06, "reasoning": "Eligible-age population in verified R1 operating-location counties is 5,476 of 98,519 statewide residents ages 12–17, or 5.56%. Provider locations counted: Kauai County. Claimed service areas were not substituted for physical operating locations.", "confidence": "High for the population calculation; provider-location completeness inherits the R1 evidence limits and is a conservative verified floor.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0254", "src-0255", "src-0039", "src-0256", "src-0261", "src-0262" ] }, { "stateCode": "HI", "stateName": "Hawaii", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "One provider/locality offers multiple distinct approaches: family conferencing, teen court, and victim-impact classes.", "confidence": "Medium — current provider evidence supports the functional classification.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0254", "src-0255", "src-0039", "src-0256" ] }, { "stateCode": "HI", "stateName": "Hawaii", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R4", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "The completed current search found no operational school-linked qualifying restorative diversion or comparable informal route.", "confidence": "High — bounded zero after the packet's completed protocol.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0254", "src-0255", "src-0039", "src-0256" ] }, { "stateCode": "ID", "stateName": "Idaho", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB1", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "The current enacted Idaho juvenile code contains diversion, accountability, restitution, and victim provisions but no express restorative-justice recognition or qualifying unnamed process. Agency Policy 677 is not enacted law, so Idaho scores 0 on LB1.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0263", "src-0264", "src-0265" ] }, { "stateCode": "ID", "stateName": "Idaho", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Idaho's completed current enacted-law search found no qualifying youth-specific restorative-justice recognition. LB2's live scale has no X outcome, so the correct classification is Verified absence/0. Because LB2=0, LB3, LB4, and LA1-LA4 remain Structural N/A/X under the live gateway.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0263" ] }, { "stateCode": "ID", "stateName": "Idaho", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB3", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Idaho's LB1 gateway is 0, so duration cannot be assessed for a nonexistent statewide youth-RJ authority. LB3 is Structural N/A/X.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0263" ] }, { "stateCode": "ID", "stateName": "Idaho", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB4", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Idaho's LB1 gateway is 0, so referral-directive strength for a statewide youth-RJ mechanism cannot be evaluated. LB4 is Structural N/A/X.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0263" ] }, { "stateCode": "ID", "stateName": "Idaho", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA1", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "LB2 is structurally inapplicable because no enacted statewide youth-RJ authority was found.", "confidence": "High for GA1/GA3; Medium for GA4", "sourceIds": [ "src-0266", "src-0267", "src-0268" ] }, { "stateCode": "ID", "stateName": "Idaho", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA2", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "The live gateway requires X.", "confidence": "High for GA1/GA3; Medium for GA4", "sourceIds": [ "src-0266", "src-0267", "src-0268" ] }, { "stateCode": "ID", "stateName": "Idaho", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA3", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "A completed search of current Idaho statutes, correctional policy, court materials, and victim services found no qualifying statewide adult restorative referral. Current victim-services policy is limited to notification/support and does not establish dialogue or a comparable repair process.", "confidence": "High — direct statewide authority/program review under the revised LA3 rule.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0269", "src-0270" ] }, { "stateCode": "ID", "stateName": "Idaho", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA4", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Idaho has no qualifying statewide youth-RJ pathway to which a completion benefit could attach. LA4 is Structural N/A/X.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0263" ] }, { "stateCode": "ID", "stateName": "Idaho", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "IDJC policy makes balanced and restorative justice integral to state juvenile program design.", "confidence": "High for GA1/GA3; Medium for GA4", "sourceIds": [ "src-0266", "src-0267", "src-0268" ] }, { "stateCode": "ID", "stateName": "Idaho", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "The Idaho Juvenile Justice Commission links the state and local juvenile providers around substantive restorative-justice practices.", "confidence": "Medium — Recent meeting activity and a fully current geographically diverse roster were not verified for tier 3.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0271", "src-0272", "src-0273" ] }, { "stateCode": "ID", "stateName": "Idaho", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "IDJC and the Juvenile Justice Commission publish multiple substantive policies and practice resources.", "confidence": "High for GA1/GA3; Medium for GA4", "sourceIds": [ "src-0266", "src-0267", "src-0268" ] }, { "stateCode": "ID", "stateName": "Idaho", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "IDJC policy requires recurring quality-improvement review of restorative implementation, though public program-level results are limited.", "confidence": "High for GA1/GA3; Medium for GA4", "sourceIds": [ "src-0266", "src-0267", "src-0268" ] }, { "stateCode": "ID", "stateName": "Idaho", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F1", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Idaho's dedicated 2024–25 Restorative Justice Grant is expressly funded with federal OJJDP Title II dollars. The current state budget, award, and procurement search found no state-origin counterpart. The old M reflected an obsolete dollar/denominator requirement; under revised F1 the completed state-origin search supports 0.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0274", "src-0275" ] }, { "stateCode": "ID", "stateName": "Idaho", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Revised F1 is Verified absence / 0 after the completed state-origin funding search. Under the live dependency rule, F2 is Structural N/A / X; excluded federal, school-only, local-only, generic-diversion, proposed, or out-of-period funding is not reused.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0274", "src-0275" ] }, { "stateCode": "ID", "stateName": "Idaho", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F3", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Revised F1 is Verified absence / 0 after the completed state-origin funding search. Under the live dependency rule, F3 is Structural N/A / X; excluded federal, school-only, local-only, generic-diversion, proposed, or out-of-period funding is not reused.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0274", "src-0275" ] }, { "stateCode": "ID", "stateName": "Idaho", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "$2.79", "scoreNumeric": 2.79, "reasoning": "FY2025 Title II allocation $630,261 ÷ 225,550 eligible residents ages 10–17 (age 10 fallback because no general statutory minimum was identified) = $2.79 per eligible youth. Full precision is retained for scoring.", "confidence": "High — official FY2025 allocation table, verified jurisdiction ages, and 2024 Census single-year-age estimates.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0016", "src-0276", "src-0277" ] }, { "stateCode": "ID", "stateName": "Idaho", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "9%", "scoreNumeric": 0.09, "reasoning": "4 / 44 = 9.09%", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0278", "src-0279", "src-0280", "src-0281", "src-0282", "src-0283", "src-0284" ] }, { "stateCode": "ID", "stateName": "Idaho", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "22%", "scoreNumeric": 0.22, "reasoning": "Eligible-age population in verified R1 operating-location counties is 50,032 of 225,550 statewide residents ages 10–17, or 22.18%. Provider locations counted: Canyon County, Fremont County, Nez Perce County, Twin Falls County. Claimed service areas were not substituted for physical operating locations.", "confidence": "High for the population calculation; provider-location completeness inherits the R1 evidence limits and is a conservative verified floor.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0278", "src-0279", "src-0280", "src-0281", "src-0282", "src-0283", "src-0284", "src-0285", "src-0286" ] }, { "stateCode": "ID", "stateName": "Idaho", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "State materials identify restorative conferencing, restorative circles, and family-group conferencing, but do not map independent delivery of the approaches by facility/provider.", "confidence": "medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0278", "src-0279", "src-0280", "src-0281", "src-0282", "src-0283", "src-0284" ] }, { "stateCode": "ID", "stateName": "Idaho", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "A current school improvement plan documents operational restorative circles for resolving problems; no substantive full-RJ school process or formal school diversion was verified.", "confidence": "medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0278", "src-0279", "src-0280", "src-0281", "src-0282", "src-0283", "src-0284" ] }, { "stateCode": "IL", "stateName": "Illinois", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Illinois's enacted community-mediation law creates an affected-party accountability and repair process for delinquency cases, even though it uses the label community mediation rather than restorative justice. The statutory process satisfies the synonym test and earns LB1.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0287", "src-0288" ] }, { "stateCode": "IL", "stateName": "Illinois", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Section 5-310 is a dedicated juvenile community-mediation statute with program purpose, panels, referrals, eligibility, dispositions, agreements, and administration. Its significant youth-specific focus earns 2 points.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0287" ] }, { "stateCode": "IL", "stateName": "Illinois", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Illinois's community-mediation authority is codified without a pilot term, sunset, or expiration. The permanent mechanism earns 2 points.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0287" ] }, { "stateCode": "IL", "stateName": "Illinois", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Current law permits State's Attorneys or their designees to establish community-mediation programs and permits referrals through diversion pathways, but it does not require RJ-specific consideration or an offer. LB4 is 0.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0287", "src-0289" ] }, { "stateCode": "IL", "stateName": "Illinois", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Section 5-310 expressly assigns program creation and administrative rules to each State's Attorney without a statewide offense floor.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0290", "src-0291", "src-0292" ] }, { "stateCode": "IL", "stateName": "Illinois", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "The same local administration controls eligibility, while station-adjustment ceilings do not govern every referral route; the broadest operative pathway is explicit local delegation.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0290", "src-0291", "src-0292" ] }, { "stateCode": "IL", "stateName": "Illinois", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA3", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Illinois has an RJ communications privilege, but that provision protects communications rather than authorizing or administering a statewide adult referral pathway. Current IDOC victim-services materials do not offer victim-offender dialogue or another qualifying process.", "confidence": "High — direct statewide authority/program review under the revised LA3 rule.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0293", "src-0294" ] }, { "stateCode": "IL", "stateName": "Illinois", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA4", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Section 5-310 sets possible obligations and a six-month agreement limit but does not guarantee dismissal, nonfiling, sealing, or expungement upon successful completion. General juvenile expungement law is not completion-linked to this RJ pathway, so LA4 is 0.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0287", "src-0295" ] }, { "stateCode": "IL", "stateName": "Illinois", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "IDJJ has an explicit statutory and operational restorative-practice role.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0290", "src-0291", "src-0292" ] }, { "stateCode": "IL", "stateName": "Illinois", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "No formal public state–local body substantively dedicated to qualifying youth restorative justice was located.", "confidence": "Medium — R3 grant partnerships and facility teams are not a statewide coordination body.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0296", "src-0297", "src-0298" ] }, { "stateCode": "IL", "stateName": "Illinois", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "State law requires restorative-practice training for IDJJ personnel and state reports document implementation.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0290", "src-0291", "src-0292" ] }, { "stateCode": "IL", "stateName": "Illinois", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Recurring juvenile-ombudsman reports publicly monitor restorative implementation across state youth facilities.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0290", "src-0291", "src-0292" ] }, { "stateCode": "IL", "stateName": "Illinois", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Illinois's state-funded Restore, Reinvest, and Renew program has a separately identified award to Alternatives, Inc. for expansion of youth restorative-justice programming. The larger R3 funding stream has multiple purposes, so its entire appropriation is not qualifying; however, the named funded restorative project satisfies tier 2 even though the public evaluation does not state its isolated award dollars.", "confidence": "Medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0299", "src-0300" ] }, { "stateCode": "IL", "stateName": "Illinois", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F2", "status": "unknown", "statusLabel": "Unknown", "scoreDisplay": "M", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "The current record separately identifies one R3-funded qualifying youth restorative project at Alternatives, Inc. That supports one funded program for F3. It does not establish that the same qualifying project was awarded at least annually through a dedicated recurring youth-RJ mechanism, so F2 remains M.", "confidence": "Medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0299", "src-0300" ] }, { "stateCode": "IL", "stateName": "Illinois", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "The current record separately identifies one R3-funded qualifying youth restorative project at Alternatives, Inc. That supports one funded program for F3. It does not establish that the same qualifying project was awarded at least annually through a dedicated recurring youth-RJ mechanism, so F2 remains M.", "confidence": "Medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0299", "src-0300" ] }, { "stateCode": "IL", "stateName": "Illinois", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "$1.01", "scoreNumeric": 1.01, "reasoning": "FY2025 Title II allocation $1,299,251 ÷ 1,287,255 eligible residents ages 10–17 (age 10 fallback because no general statutory minimum was identified) = $1.01 per eligible youth. Full precision is retained for scoring.", "confidence": "High — official FY2025 allocation table, verified jurisdiction ages, and 2024 Census single-year-age estimates.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0016", "src-0301", "src-0302" ] }, { "stateCode": "IL", "stateName": "Illinois", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "7%", "scoreNumeric": 0.07, "reasoning": "7 / 102 = 6.86%", "confidence": "medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0303", "src-0304", "src-0305", "src-0306", "src-0307", "src-0308", "src-0309" ] }, { "stateCode": "IL", "stateName": "Illinois", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "54%", "scoreNumeric": 0.54, "reasoning": "Eligible-age population in verified R1 operating-location counties is 689,196 of 1,287,255 statewide residents ages 10–17, or 53.54%. Provider locations counted: Cook County, DuPage County, Jersey County, Kane County, Logan County, Saline County, Winnebago County. Claimed service areas were not substituted for physical operating locations.", "confidence": "High for the population calculation; provider-location completeness inherits the R1 evidence limits and is a conservative verified floor.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0303", "src-0304", "src-0305", "src-0306", "src-0307", "src-0308", "src-0309", "src-0310", "src-0311" ] }, { "stateCode": "IL", "stateName": "Illinois", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Current IDJJ facilities document victim-centered restorative interventions, while Winnebago County independently operates a pre-adjudicatory juvenile diversion pathway emphasizing restorative practices through public service and victim restitution. These are functionally distinct approaches across providers and jurisdictions.", "confidence": "medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0303", "src-0304", "src-0305", "src-0306", "src-0307", "src-0308", "src-0309" ] }, { "stateCode": "IL", "stateName": "Illinois", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Chicago Public Schools currently uses restorative approaches as alternatives to exclusion and to understand impact and repair harm, but a formal RJ diversion route replacing police/court processing was not verified.", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0303", "src-0304", "src-0305", "src-0306", "src-0307", "src-0308", "src-0309" ] }, { "stateCode": "IN", "stateName": "Indiana", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Indiana law expressly defines restorative justice services and authorizes them within juvenile diversion. This current enacted statewide recognition satisfies LB1.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0312", "src-0313", "src-0314" ] }, { "stateCode": "IN", "stateName": "Indiana", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "The restorative provision is expressly youth-specific but brief within the broader juvenile-diversion chapter. It does not create a detailed standalone RJ process, so LB2 is 1.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0315", "src-0316" ] }, { "stateCode": "IN", "stateName": "Indiana", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Indiana's youth-RJ authorization remains codified without a pilot term, sunset, or expiration. The permanent authority earns 2 points.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0312", "src-0316" ] }, { "stateCode": "IN", "stateName": "Indiana", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Indiana says juvenile diversion may include RJ, while intake recommendation and prosecutor approval are discretionary. No official must consider or offer RJ specifically, so LB4 is 0.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0315", "src-0316" ] }, { "stateCode": "IN", "stateName": "Indiana", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "4", "scoreNumeric": 4, "reasoning": "Current law requires individualized validated-risk screening and contains no broad statewide offense exclusion.", "confidence": "High, except LA2 is a bounded zero based on completed statutory silence", "sourceIds": [ "src-0317", "src-0318", "src-0319" ] }, { "stateCode": "IN", "stateName": "Indiana", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "The completed controlling-law search found no meaningful statewide prior-contact rule.", "confidence": "High, except LA2 is a bounded zero based on completed statutory silence", "sourceIds": [ "src-0317", "src-0318", "src-0319" ] }, { "stateCode": "IN", "stateName": "Indiana", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Indiana Code §§35-40-6-4 and -5 require prosecutors and victim-assistance programs in counties with a victim-offender reconciliation program to offer eligible victims an opportunity to meet the accused or offender, describe harm, and negotiate restitution. The adult criminal code contains no youth-only age limit.", "confidence": "High — direct statewide authority/program review under the revised LA3 rule.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0320" ] }, { "stateCode": "IN", "stateName": "Indiana", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "If a child successfully completes juvenile diversion that includes RJ, Indiana law requires that no petition be filed and no further action be taken. That guaranteed nonfiling benefit earns 2 points.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0321", "src-0322" ] }, { "stateCode": "IN", "stateName": "Indiana", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "ICJI administers a statewide juvenile-diversion grant framework whose governing materials expressly include restorative services.", "confidence": "High, except LA2 is a bounded zero based on completed statutory silence", "sourceIds": [ "src-0317", "src-0318", "src-0319" ] }, { "stateCode": "IN", "stateName": "Indiana", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "No formal public state–local body substantively dedicated to qualifying youth restorative justice was located.", "confidence": "Medium — The Youth Justice Oversight Committee addresses diversion broadly rather than youth RJ as a substantive standing focus.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0323", "src-0324", "src-0325" ] }, { "stateCode": "IN", "stateName": "Indiana", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "ICJI and the Youth Justice Oversight Committee publish grant guidance, a program directory, and restorative-diversion recommendations.", "confidence": "High, except LA2 is a bounded zero based on completed statutory silence", "sourceIds": [ "src-0317", "src-0318", "src-0319" ] }, { "stateCode": "IN", "stateName": "Indiana", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Recurring state grant and oversight materials monitor local diversion infrastructure and identify restorative models.", "confidence": "High, except LA2 is a bounded zero based on completed statutory silence", "sourceIds": [ "src-0317", "src-0318", "src-0319" ] }, { "stateCode": "IN", "stateName": "Indiana", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Indiana's active, General-Assembly-funded Juvenile Diversion Grant Program expressly requires the funded system to emphasize restorative justice focused on repairing harm to victims and the community. It is broader diversion funding and the restorative share of individual grants is inseparable, so tier 1 applies. The currently active July 2026–June 2028 cycle is state-funded through the biennial budget.", "confidence": "Medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0326" ] }, { "stateCode": "IN", "stateName": "Indiana", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "The General-Assembly-funded Juvenile Diversion Grant Program is a dedicated recurring grant fund with multiple overlapping completed/current award periods listed from 2024 through 2028, and every funded project must emphasize restorative justice. F2 is 3. The current public page permits multi-county applications but does not publish a final current recipient-by-county roster, so F3 remains M.", "confidence": "Medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0326" ] }, { "stateCode": "IN", "stateName": "Indiana", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F3", "status": "unknown", "statusLabel": "Unknown", "scoreDisplay": "M", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "The General-Assembly-funded Juvenile Diversion Grant Program is a dedicated recurring grant fund with multiple overlapping completed/current award periods listed from 2024 through 2028, and every funded project must emphasize restorative justice. F2 is 3. The current public page permits multi-county applications but does not publish a final current recipient-by-county roster, so F3 remains M.", "confidence": "Medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0326" ] }, { "stateCode": "IN", "stateName": "Indiana", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "$1.31", "scoreNumeric": 1.31, "reasoning": "FY2025 Title II allocation $967,651 ÷ 740,769 eligible residents ages 10–17 (age 10 fallback because no general statutory minimum was identified) = $1.31 per eligible youth. Full precision is retained for scoring.", "confidence": "High — official FY2025 allocation table, verified jurisdiction ages, and 2024 Census single-year-age estimates.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0016", "src-0327", "src-0328" ] }, { "stateCode": "IN", "stateName": "Indiana", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "7%", "scoreNumeric": 0.07, "reasoning": "6 / 92 = 6.52%", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0329", "src-0330", "src-0331", "src-0332" ] }, { "stateCode": "IN", "stateName": "Indiana", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "23%", "scoreNumeric": 0.23, "reasoning": "Eligible-age population in verified R1 operating-location counties is 171,085 of 740,769 statewide residents ages 10–17, or 23.10%. Provider locations counted: Kosciusko County, Marion County, Monroe County, Tippecanoe County, Vanderburgh County, Vigo County. Claimed service areas were not substituted for physical operating locations.", "confidence": "High for the population calculation; provider-location completeness inherits the R1 evidence limits and is a conservative verified floor.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0329", "src-0330", "src-0331", "src-0332", "src-0333", "src-0334" ] }, { "stateCode": "IN", "stateName": "Indiana", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "The current directory verifies distributed teen court, restorative circles, victim-offender dialogue, family-group conferencing, shoplifting/theft education, and community-service approaches across multiple counties and providers.", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0329", "src-0330", "src-0331", "src-0332" ] }, { "stateCode": "IN", "stateName": "Indiana", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "Tippecanoe's School-Justice Partnership accepts school-administrator referrals without SRO arrest and routes students into restorative/diversion services; several other directory programs accept school-based offenses.", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0329", "src-0330", "src-0331", "src-0332" ] }, { "stateCode": "IA", "stateName": "Iowa", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB1", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Iowa's current juvenile code does not expressly recognize restorative justice, and its informal-adjustment provisions do not describe enough affected-party participation and harm repair to qualify as an unnamed equivalent. Administrative descriptions of a restorative model cannot satisfy LB1.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0335", "src-0336" ] }, { "stateCode": "IA", "stateName": "Iowa", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Iowa's completed current enacted-law search found no qualifying youth-specific restorative-justice recognition. LB2's live scale has no X outcome, so the correct classification is Verified absence/0. Because LB2=0, LB3, LB4, and LA1-LA4 remain Structural N/A/X under the live gateway.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0335" ] }, { "stateCode": "IA", "stateName": "Iowa", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB3", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Iowa's LB1 gateway is 0, so duration cannot be assessed for a nonexistent statewide youth-RJ authority. LB3 is Structural N/A/X.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0335" ] }, { "stateCode": "IA", "stateName": "Iowa", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB4", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Iowa's LB1 gateway is 0, so referral-directive strength for a statewide youth-RJ mechanism cannot be evaluated. LB4 is Structural N/A/X.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0335" ] }, { "stateCode": "IA", "stateName": "Iowa", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA1", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "LB2 is structurally inapplicable because enacted law contains no qualifying youth-RJ authority.", "confidence": "High for the Legal gateway; Medium for Governance", "sourceIds": [ "src-0337", "src-0338" ] }, { "stateCode": "IA", "stateName": "Iowa", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA2", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "The live gateway requires X.", "confidence": "High for the Legal gateway; Medium for Governance", "sourceIds": [ "src-0337", "src-0338" ] }, { "stateCode": "IA", "stateName": "Iowa", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "The Iowa Department of Corrections Office of Victim and Restorative Justice Programs operates a statewide victim-initiated dialogue process for incarcerated people and people under correctional supervision, focused on accountability and repairing harm.", "confidence": "High — direct statewide authority/program review under the revised LA3 rule.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0339" ] }, { "stateCode": "IA", "stateName": "Iowa", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA4", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Iowa has no qualifying statewide youth-RJ pathway to which a completion benefit could attach. LA4 is Structural N/A/X.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0335" ] }, { "stateCode": "IA", "stateName": "Iowa", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Iowa Judicial Branch juvenile-court administration expressly uses a balanced and restorative justice model.", "confidence": "High for the Legal gateway; Medium for Governance", "sourceIds": [ "src-0337", "src-0338" ] }, { "stateCode": "IA", "stateName": "Iowa", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "No formal public state–local body dedicated to coordinating youth restorative justice was located.", "confidence": "Medium — Local partnerships in Scott County and West Des Moines do not establish a statewide body.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0340", "src-0341", "src-0342" ] }, { "stateCode": "IA", "stateName": "Iowa", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "The state supplies basic public BARJ program descriptions but no recurring training or technical-assistance series was verified.", "confidence": "High for the Legal gateway; Medium for Governance", "sourceIds": [ "src-0337", "src-0338" ] }, { "stateCode": "IA", "stateName": "Iowa", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Recurring juvenile-court reporting monitors the broader system containing the BARJ model without separately reporting restorative activity.", "confidence": "High for the Legal gateway; Medium for Governance", "sourceIds": [ "src-0337", "src-0338" ] }, { "stateCode": "IA", "stateName": "Iowa", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F1", "status": "unknown", "statusLabel": "Unknown", "scoreDisplay": "M", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Iowa solicited a state Youth Restorative Justice contract for Scott County with operations beginning July 1, 2026. The state procurement page contains a June 24 letter of intent to award, but no executed award or contract was located. A notice of intent is excluded, while the post–July 1 status remains unresolved. F1 is M, not 0.", "confidence": "Medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0343" ] }, { "stateCode": "IA", "stateName": "Iowa", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F2", "status": "unknown", "statusLabel": "Unknown", "scoreDisplay": "M", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Only a notice of intent to award the Scott County Youth Restorative Justice contract was verified. An unexecuted award cannot establish either recurrence or funded geography.", "confidence": "Medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0343" ] }, { "stateCode": "IA", "stateName": "Iowa", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F3", "status": "unknown", "statusLabel": "Unknown", "scoreDisplay": "M", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Only a notice of intent to award the Scott County Youth Restorative Justice contract was verified. An unexecuted award cannot establish either recurrence or funded geography.", "confidence": "Medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0343" ] }, { "stateCode": "IA", "stateName": "Iowa", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "$1.95", "scoreNumeric": 1.95, "reasoning": "FY2025 Title II allocation $667,142 ÷ 341,909 eligible residents ages 10–17 (age 10 fallback because no general statutory minimum was identified) = $1.95 per eligible youth. Full precision is retained for scoring.", "confidence": "High — official FY2025 allocation table, verified jurisdiction ages, and 2024 Census single-year-age estimates.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0016", "src-0344", "src-0345" ] }, { "stateCode": "IA", "stateName": "Iowa", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1%", "scoreNumeric": 0.01, "reasoning": "1 / 99 = 1.01%", "confidence": "medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0346", "src-0347", "src-0348", "src-0349", "src-0350" ] }, { "stateCode": "IA", "stateName": "Iowa", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "16%", "scoreNumeric": 0.16, "reasoning": "Eligible-age population in verified R1 operating-location counties is 56,000 of 341,909 statewide residents ages 10–17, or 16.38%. Provider locations counted: Polk County. Claimed service areas were not substituted for physical operating locations.", "confidence": "High for the population calculation; provider-location completeness inherits the R1 evidence limits and is a conservative verified floor.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0346", "src-0347", "src-0348", "src-0349", "src-0350", "src-0351", "src-0352" ] }, { "stateCode": "IA", "stateName": "Iowa", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "West Des Moines YJI combines justice circles with family coaching/mediation and restorative community work, but the multiple approaches are concentrated in one provider/locality.", "confidence": "medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0346", "src-0347", "src-0348", "src-0349", "src-0350" ] }, { "stateCode": "IA", "stateName": "Iowa", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "YJI is operationally tied to West Des Moines schools and uses restorative processes to address harm and keep youth engaged in school; a direct school referral route replacing court processing was not verified.", "confidence": "medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0346", "src-0347", "src-0348", "src-0349", "src-0350" ] }, { "stateCode": "KS", "stateName": "Kansas", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Kansas law expressly authorizes state grants to counties for balanced and restorative justice programs serving juvenile offenders. That current enacted statewide recognition satisfies LB1.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0353" ] }, { "stateCode": "KS", "stateName": "Kansas", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "The provision is expressly youth-specific but only lists balanced and restorative justice among a broader set of grant-eligible juvenile community-corrections services. The brief/general youth focus earns 1 point.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0353" ] }, { "stateCode": "KS", "stateName": "Kansas", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "The juvenile RJ grant authority remains codified without a pilot term, sunset, or expiration. Kansas earns 2 points for a permanent authority.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0353" ] }, { "stateCode": "KS", "stateName": "Kansas", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Kansas permits the Secretary of Corrections to make grants that may support balanced and restorative justice programs but imposes no case-level duty to consider or offer RJ. LB4 is 0.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0353" ] }, { "stateCode": "KS", "stateName": "Kansas", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "The enacted balanced-RJ grant authority contains no meaningful statewide offense rule; generic immediate-intervention rules cannot be imported into every funded RJ pathway.", "confidence": "High for LA1/LA2; Medium-High for Governance", "sourceIds": [ "src-0354", "src-0355", "src-0356" ] }, { "stateCode": "KS", "stateName": "Kansas", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "The same authority contains no meaningful statewide prior-contact rule.", "confidence": "High for LA1/LA2; Medium-High for Governance", "sourceIds": [ "src-0354", "src-0355", "src-0356" ] }, { "stateCode": "KS", "stateName": "Kansas", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "The Kansas Department of Corrections Office of Victim Services offers a statewide Victim/Offender Dialogue program for victims or survivors of severe violence to meet an offender with trained facilitators.", "confidence": "High — direct statewide authority/program review under the revised LA3 rule.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0357" ] }, { "stateCode": "KS", "stateName": "Kansas", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA4", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Kansas's enacted RJ grant authority guarantees no dismissal, nonfiling, sealing, or expungement after successful participation. The completion benefit in generic immediate intervention is not legally tied to every RJ pathway, so LA4 is 0.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0353", "src-0358" ] }, { "stateCode": "KS", "stateName": "Kansas", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "The Kansas Department of Corrections administers a youth grant framework expressly authorizing balanced and restorative justice.", "confidence": "High for LA1/LA2; Medium-High for Governance", "sourceIds": [ "src-0354", "src-0355", "src-0356" ] }, { "stateCode": "KS", "stateName": "Kansas", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "No formal public state–local body substantively dedicated to youth restorative justice was located.", "confidence": "Medium — JJOC is a broad juvenile-justice oversight body; restorative justice was not verified as a substantive standing focus.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0359", "src-0360", "src-0361" ] }, { "stateCode": "KS", "stateName": "Kansas", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Current statutes and grant materials provide basic implementation references, but no recurring training or technical-assistance function was verified.", "confidence": "High for LA1/LA2; Medium-High for Governance", "sourceIds": [ "src-0354", "src-0355", "src-0356" ] }, { "stateCode": "KS", "stateName": "Kansas", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "Recurring KDOC reporting provides community-program and jurisdiction-level funding/participation detail for the administered youth system containing balanced-RJ programs.", "confidence": "High for LA1/LA2; Medium-High for Governance", "sourceIds": [ "src-0354", "src-0355", "src-0356" ] }, { "stateCode": "KS", "stateName": "Kansas", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Kansas's FY2025 official grant report separately identifies the Salina Initiative for Restorative Justice's victim-offender mediation program within the state Juvenile Corrections Advisory Board grant system and reports 118 youth served. The surrounding judicial-district allocation combines multiple programs and does not isolate Salina's award amount, but the funded restorative subprogram is separately identified. Tier 2 applies.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0362", "src-0363" ] }, { "stateCode": "KS", "stateName": "Kansas", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F2", "status": "unknown", "statusLabel": "Unknown", "scoreDisplay": "M", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "The Salina Initiative for Restorative Justice is the one qualifying funded program separately identified in the current state grant record, supporting F3=1. The reviewed materials do not establish that this same qualifying award was renewed more than once or funded through a dedicated recurring RJ grant program.", "confidence": "Medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0362", "src-0363" ] }, { "stateCode": "KS", "stateName": "Kansas", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "The Salina Initiative for Restorative Justice is the one qualifying funded program separately identified in the current state grant record, supporting F3=1. The reviewed materials do not establish that this same qualifying award was renewed more than once or funded through a dedicated recurring RJ grant program.", "confidence": "Medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0362", "src-0363" ] }, { "stateCode": "KS", "stateName": "Kansas", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "$2.02", "scoreNumeric": 2.02, "reasoning": "FY2025 Title II allocation $664,280 ÷ 328,869 eligible residents ages 10–17 (statutory minimum age 10) = $2.02 per eligible youth. Full precision is retained for scoring.", "confidence": "High — official FY2025 allocation table, verified jurisdiction ages, and 2024 Census single-year-age estimates.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0016", "src-0364", "src-0365" ] }, { "stateCode": "KS", "stateName": "Kansas", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3%", "scoreNumeric": 0.03, "reasoning": "3 / 105 = 2.86%", "confidence": "medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0366", "src-0367", "src-0368", "src-0369", "src-0370" ] }, { "stateCode": "KS", "stateName": "Kansas", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "23%", "scoreNumeric": 0.23, "reasoning": "Eligible-age population in verified R1 operating-location counties is 76,204 of 328,869 statewide residents ages 10–17, or 23.17%. Provider locations counted: Crawford County, Douglas County, Sedgwick County. Claimed service areas were not substituted for physical operating locations.", "confidence": "High for the population calculation; provider-location completeness inherits the R1 evidence limits and is a conservative verified floor.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0366", "src-0367", "src-0368", "src-0369", "src-0370", "src-0371", "src-0372" ] }, { "stateCode": "KS", "stateName": "Kansas", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Douglas County's victim-offender dialogue is functionally distinct from Wichita's restorative early intervention and Crawford County's restorative authority programming, across multiple jurisdictions.", "confidence": "medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0366", "src-0367", "src-0368", "src-0369", "src-0370" ] }, { "stateCode": "KS", "stateName": "Kansas", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R4", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "The completed school-route search found no current operational school alternative meeting the R4 tiers; policy, grants, and planned projects were excluded.", "confidence": "medium-low", "sourceIds": [ "src-0366", "src-0367", "src-0368", "src-0369", "src-0370" ] }, { "stateCode": "KY", "stateName": "Kentucky", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Kentucky expressly requires juvenile restorative justice committees and programs throughout the state. The current enacted recognition satisfies LB1.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0373" ] }, { "stateCode": "KY", "stateName": "Kentucky", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "KRS 15A.064 is a dedicated youth-RJ provision with mandatory statewide committee infrastructure, program development, enumerated referral sources, offense exclusions, and reporting. That significant youth focus earns 2 points.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0373" ] }, { "stateCode": "KY", "stateName": "Kentucky", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "KRS 15A.064 took effect July 15, 2024 and contains no pilot term, sunset, or expiration. Kentucky earns 2 points for permanent authority.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0373" ] }, { "stateCode": "KY", "stateName": "Kentucky", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "The law requires local infrastructure and permits referrals from several sources, including a child or family request, but it does not require decision-makers to consider or offer RJ in an individual case. LB4 is 0.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0373" ] }, { "stateCode": "KY", "stateName": "Kentucky", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "State law excludes offenses that classify a child as a violent offender, leaving a statewide low-level/nonviolent ceiling.", "confidence": "High for Legal; Medium for Governance", "sourceIds": [ "src-0374", "src-0375" ] }, { "stateCode": "KY", "stateName": "Kentucky", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "The completed controlling-law search found no meaningful statewide prior-contact rule.", "confidence": "High for Legal; Medium for Governance", "sourceIds": [ "src-0374", "src-0375" ] }, { "stateCode": "KY", "stateName": "Kentucky", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA3", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "A completed search of current statutes, court and corrections program catalogs, and victim-services materials found no statewide adult referral to a qualifying restorative process. Located adult programs were treatment, reentry, or generic supervision programs.", "confidence": "Medium-high — direct statewide authority/program review under the revised LA3 rule.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0376", "src-0377" ] }, { "stateCode": "KY", "stateName": "Kentucky", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA4", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "KRS 15A.064 guarantees no nonfiling, dismissal, sealing, or expungement upon successful RJ completion. Generic juvenile benefits elsewhere are not legally tied to this pathway, so LA4 is 0.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0373" ] }, { "stateCode": "KY", "stateName": "Kentucky", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "The Justice and Public Safety Cabinet administers the statutory statewide restorative-justice committee framework.", "confidence": "High for Legal; Medium for Governance", "sourceIds": [ "src-0374", "src-0375" ] }, { "stateCode": "KY", "stateName": "Kentucky", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Statute creates a formal state-linked network of local juvenile restorative-justice advisory committees with recurring reporting duties.", "confidence": "Medium — Current operation across multiple regions and a meeting within the last year were not fully verified for tier 3.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0378", "src-0379", "src-0380" ] }, { "stateCode": "KY", "stateName": "Kentucky", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Current statute and committee materials provide basic implementation references, but no recurring state training or technical-assistance series was verified.", "confidence": "High for Legal; Medium for Governance", "sourceIds": [ "src-0374", "src-0375" ] }, { "stateCode": "KY", "stateName": "Kentucky", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "State/local committee reporting is required, but recurring public restorative-specific results were not verified.", "confidence": "High for Legal; Medium for Governance", "sourceIds": [ "src-0374", "src-0375" ] }, { "stateCode": "KY", "stateName": "Kentucky", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F1", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Current law requires local juvenile restorative-justice committees, but authorization and committee duties do not themselves establish state funding. The identified KY-ASAP support is a 2023 mixed substance-use/community funding record and does not establish a youth-justice restorative award. The completed current budget, grant, and procurement search produced no qualifying state-origin funding.", "confidence": "Medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0374", "src-0381" ] }, { "stateCode": "KY", "stateName": "Kentucky", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Revised F1 is Verified absence / 0 after the completed state-origin funding search. Under the live dependency rule, F2 is Structural N/A / X; excluded federal, school-only, local-only, generic-diversion, proposed, or out-of-period funding is not reused.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0374", "src-0381" ] }, { "stateCode": "KY", "stateName": "Kentucky", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F3", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Revised F1 is Verified absence / 0 after the completed state-origin funding search. Under the live dependency rule, F3 is Structural N/A / X; excluded federal, school-only, local-only, generic-diversion, proposed, or out-of-period funding is not reused.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0374", "src-0381" ] }, { "stateCode": "KY", "stateName": "Kentucky", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "$1.50", "scoreNumeric": 1.5, "reasoning": "FY2025 Title II allocation $711,582 ÷ 475,020 eligible residents ages 10–17 (age 10 fallback because no general statutory minimum was identified) = $1.50 per eligible youth. Full precision is retained for scoring.", "confidence": "High — official FY2025 allocation table, verified jurisdiction ages, and 2024 Census single-year-age estimates.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0016", "src-0382", "src-0383" ] }, { "stateCode": "KY", "stateName": "Kentucky", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2%", "scoreNumeric": 0.02, "reasoning": "2 / 120 = 1.67%", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0384", "src-0385", "src-0386", "src-0387" ] }, { "stateCode": "KY", "stateName": "Kentucky", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "18%", "scoreNumeric": 0.18, "reasoning": "Eligible-age population in verified R1 operating-location counties is 85,492 of 475,020 statewide residents ages 10–17, or 18.00%. Provider locations counted: Jefferson County, Laurel County. Claimed service areas were not substituted for physical operating locations.", "confidence": "High for the population calculation; provider-location completeness inherits the R1 evidence limits and is a conservative verified floor.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0384", "src-0385", "src-0386", "src-0387", "src-0388", "src-0389" ] }, { "stateCode": "KY", "stateName": "Kentucky", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "One facilitated conferencing model is verified at two offices; the provider's broader service-area list does not create additional location counties or distinct approaches.", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0384", "src-0385", "src-0386", "src-0387" ] }, { "stateCode": "KY", "stateName": "Kentucky", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "The model is integrated into seven Jefferson County schools and substantively involves accountability, harmed parties, community, and repair; the provider describes SRO partnership as exploratory, so tier 3 is not established.", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0384", "src-0385", "src-0386", "src-0387" ] }, { "stateCode": "LA", "stateName": "Louisiana", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Louisiana law expressly recognizes balanced and restorative justice programs as juvenile sanctions and requires participating local grant plans to be based on balanced-RJ principles. LB1 is 1.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0390", "src-0391" ] }, { "stateCode": "LA", "stateName": "Louisiana", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "The provisions are expressly youth-specific but place balanced RJ within a broader community juvenile-services grant framework without detailed statewide case procedures. The brief/general youth focus earns 1 point.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0390", "src-0391" ] }, { "stateCode": "LA", "stateName": "Louisiana", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "The balanced-RJ grant-planning provisions remain codified without a pilot term, sunset, or expiration. Louisiana earns 2 points for permanent authority.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0390", "src-0391" ] }, { "stateCode": "LA", "stateName": "Louisiana", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Louisiana encourages balanced-RJ principles and conditions grant participation on a compliant jurisdictional plan, but the law imposes no individual-case duty to consider or offer RJ. LB4 is 0.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0392" ] }, { "stateCode": "LA", "stateName": "Louisiana", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "R.S. 46:2610 requires participating parishes, municipalities, courts, and school systems to adopt their own balanced-RJ plans; offense eligibility is expressly left to those local plans without a statewide floor.", "confidence": "High for LA1/LA2/GA4; Medium for GA1/GA3", "sourceIds": [ "src-0393", "src-0394", "src-0395" ] }, { "stateCode": "LA", "stateName": "Louisiana", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "The same statutory plan structure delegates prior-contact eligibility locally without a statewide floor.", "confidence": "High for LA1/LA2/GA4; Medium for GA1/GA3", "sourceIds": [ "src-0393", "src-0394", "src-0395" ] }, { "stateCode": "LA", "stateName": "Louisiana", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Louisiana DPS&C administers a victim-initiated Victim-Offender Dialogue for imprisoned adults. The process requires offender participation, accountability, direct acknowledgment of harm, and a facilitated meeting with the victim.", "confidence": "High — direct statewide authority/program review under the revised LA3 rule.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0396" ] }, { "stateCode": "LA", "stateName": "Louisiana", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA4", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "The balanced-RJ grant statutes guarantee no nonfiling, dismissal, sealing, or expungement after successful participation. Generic juvenile dispositions are not tied to this pathway, so LA4 is 0.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0390", "src-0391" ] }, { "stateCode": "LA", "stateName": "Louisiana", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "OJJ and the statutory grant administrator have an explicit restorative role within existing state youth-justice administration.", "confidence": "High for LA1/LA2/GA4; Medium for GA1/GA3", "sourceIds": [ "src-0393", "src-0394", "src-0395" ] }, { "stateCode": "LA", "stateName": "Louisiana", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "No formal public state–local body substantively dedicated to qualifying youth restorative justice was located.", "confidence": "Medium — General OJJ partnerships do not meet the formal-body requirement.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0397", "src-0398", "src-0399" ] }, { "stateCode": "LA", "stateName": "Louisiana", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Current law and OJJ planning provide basic implementation direction, but no recurring public training or technical-assistance series was verified.", "confidence": "High for LA1/LA2/GA4; Medium for GA1/GA3", "sourceIds": [ "src-0393", "src-0394", "src-0395" ] }, { "stateCode": "LA", "stateName": "Louisiana", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "R.S. 46:2610(H) requires quarterly recipient reporting for a grant system that expressly incorporates balanced and restorative justice; restorative results are not separately published.", "confidence": "High for LA1/LA2/GA4; Medium for GA1/GA3", "sourceIds": [ "src-0393", "src-0394", "src-0395" ] }, { "stateCode": "LA", "stateName": "Louisiana", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F1", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Louisiana law makes balanced and restorative justice an allowable or encouraged use of juvenile sanctions grants, and the OJJ strategic plan proposes restorative partnerships. Neither authorization nor a strategic plan establishes an actual current award. The completed state budget, grant, contract, and procurement search found no qualifying state-origin allocation.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0400", "src-0401" ] }, { "stateCode": "LA", "stateName": "Louisiana", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Revised F1 is Verified absence / 0 after the completed state-origin funding search. Under the live dependency rule, F2 is Structural N/A / X; excluded federal, school-only, local-only, generic-diversion, proposed, or out-of-period funding is not reused.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0400", "src-0401" ] }, { "stateCode": "LA", "stateName": "Louisiana", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F3", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Revised F1 is Verified absence / 0 after the completed state-origin funding search. Under the live dependency rule, F3 is Structural N/A / X; excluded federal, school-only, local-only, generic-diversion, proposed, or out-of-period funding is not reused.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0400", "src-0401" ] }, { "stateCode": "LA", "stateName": "Louisiana", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "$1.10", "scoreNumeric": 1.1, "reasoning": "FY2025 Title II allocation $467,205 ÷ 426,158 eligible residents ages 10–16 (statutory minimum age 10) = $1.10 per eligible youth. Full precision is retained for scoring.", "confidence": "High — official FY2025 allocation table, verified jurisdiction ages, and 2024 Census single-year-age estimates.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0016", "src-0402", "src-0403" ] }, { "stateCode": "LA", "stateName": "Louisiana", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2%", "scoreNumeric": 0.02, "reasoning": "1 / 64 = 1.56%", "confidence": "medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0404", "src-0402", "src-0405" ] }, { "stateCode": "LA", "stateName": "Louisiana", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "5%", "scoreNumeric": 0.05, "reasoning": "Eligible-age population in verified R1 operating-location counties is 21,173 of 426,158 statewide residents ages 10–16, or 4.97%. Provider locations counted: Caddo Parish. Claimed service areas were not substituted for physical operating locations.", "confidence": "High for the population calculation; provider-location completeness inherits the R1 evidence limits and is a conservative verified floor.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0404", "src-0402", "src-0405", "src-0406", "src-0407" ] }, { "stateCode": "LA", "stateName": "Louisiana", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "The verified current qualifying pathway is one restorative diversion/Teen Court family in Caddo Parish.", "confidence": "medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0404", "src-0402", "src-0405" ] }, { "stateCode": "LA", "stateName": "Louisiana", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R4", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "The completed school-route search found no current qualifying operational school-linked RJ alternative; Caddo's restorative program is DA-referred, and school-fighting intake evidence does not establish an RJ school route.", "confidence": "medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0404", "src-0402", "src-0405" ] }, { "stateCode": "ME", "stateName": "Maine", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Maine's Juvenile Code expressly defines restorative justice programs and protects juvenile statements made during them. Current law also governs commissioner-established juvenile RJ services. LB1 is 1.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0408", "src-0409" ] }, { "stateCode": "ME", "stateName": "Maine", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Maine has multiple operative youth-specific provisions: a detailed RJ definition and evidentiary protection, a service duty for state-established juvenile programs, and an RJ-linked record consequence. Together they constitute significant youth focus and earn 2 points.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0408", "src-0409", "src-0410" ] }, { "stateCode": "ME", "stateName": "Maine", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "The operative youth-RJ provisions are permanent codified law with no pilot term, sunset, or expiration. Maine earns 2 points.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0408", "src-0409", "src-0410" ] }, { "stateCode": "ME", "stateName": "Maine", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Maine recognizes and regulates juvenile RJ programs but does not require a decision-maker to consider or offer RJ in an individual case. LB4 is 0.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0408", "src-0409" ] }, { "stateCode": "ME", "stateName": "Maine", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA1", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Accessible statewide authorities establish restorative programming but no meaningful statewide offense rule or explicit delegation.", "confidence": "High — bounded zero after the packet's completed protocol.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0411", "src-0412", "src-0413", "src-0414" ] }, { "stateCode": "ME", "stateName": "Maine", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Accessible statewide authorities establish restorative programming but no meaningful statewide prior-contact rule or explicit delegation.", "confidence": "High — bounded zero after the packet's completed protocol.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0411", "src-0412", "src-0413", "src-0414" ] }, { "stateCode": "ME", "stateName": "Maine", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Current Maine DOC policy allows a victim to request a facilitated dialogue with an adult prisoner or adult under community supervision, with separate preparation and agency approval.", "confidence": "High — direct statewide authority/program review under the revised LA3 rule.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0415", "src-0416" ] }, { "stateCode": "ME", "stateName": "Maine", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "4", "scoreNumeric": 4, "reasoning": "For qualifying lower-level juvenile crimes, final discharge from a disposition that included a completed restorative justice event triggers a mandatory court sealing order within five business days. The legally automatic RJ-linked record benefit earns 4 points.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0417" ] }, { "stateCode": "ME", "stateName": "Maine", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Current DOC policy identifies a Juvenile Restorative Justice Coordinator.", "confidence": "High — current primary state evidence directly supports this tier.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0411", "src-0412", "src-0413", "src-0414" ] }, { "stateCode": "ME", "stateName": "Maine", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "The Juvenile Justice Advisory Group and contracted provider structure join state and multiple local actors around substantive youth-RJ implementation.", "confidence": "Medium — A current geographically diverse roster and meeting record specific to RJ were not fully verified.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0418", "src-0419", "src-0420" ] }, { "stateCode": "ME", "stateName": "Maine", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "Current statewide policies require circle-keeper and restorative-practices training, including annual refreshers.", "confidence": "High — current primary state evidence directly supports this tier.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0411", "src-0412", "src-0413", "src-0414" ] }, { "stateCode": "ME", "stateName": "Maine", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "Annual Juvenile Division reports identify contracted providers and award amounts.", "confidence": "High — current primary state evidence directly supports this tier.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0411", "src-0412", "src-0413", "src-0414" ] }, { "stateCode": "ME", "stateName": "Maine", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "FY2025 separately itemizes six youth restorative-justice contracts totaling $1,114,000.", "confidence": "High — current primary-source evidence supports the stated numerator and denominator.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0421", "src-0422", "src-0423", "src-0014" ] }, { "stateCode": "ME", "stateName": "Maine", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "Actual FY2025 juvenile restorative contracts and a continuing multiyear initiative establish an annually sustained dedicated contract program.", "confidence": "High — current primary state records support the revised tier.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0424", "src-0425", "src-0426" ] }, { "stateCode": "ME", "stateName": "Maine", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "The completed FY2025 record documents six separately funded providers across multiple counties, but not qualifying coverage in at least 13 of 16 counties.", "confidence": "Medium — multiple funded jurisdictions are verified, but the nearly-all threshold is not met.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0424", "src-0425", "src-0426" ] }, { "stateCode": "ME", "stateName": "Maine", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "$5.96", "scoreNumeric": 5.96, "reasoning": "FY2025 Title II allocation $622,975 ÷ 104,559 eligible residents ages 11–17 (statutory minimum age 11) = $5.96 per eligible youth. Full precision is retained for scoring.", "confidence": "High — official FY2025 allocation table, verified jurisdiction ages, and 2024 Census single-year-age estimates.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0016", "src-0427", "src-0428" ] }, { "stateCode": "ME", "stateName": "Maine", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "38%", "scoreNumeric": 0.38, "reasoning": "Six contracted providers have operating locations in 6 of 16 counties: 38%; office county, not service area, is used.", "confidence": "High — current primary-source evidence supports the stated numerator and denominator.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0421", "src-0422", "src-0423", "src-0014" ] }, { "stateCode": "ME", "stateName": "Maine", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "47%", "scoreNumeric": 0.47, "reasoning": "Eligible-age population in verified R1 operating-location counties is 49,144 of 104,559 statewide residents ages 11–17, or 47.00%. Provider locations counted: Androscoggin County, Aroostook County, Hancock County, Penobscot County, Waldo County, York County. Claimed service areas were not substituted for physical operating locations.", "confidence": "High for the population calculation; provider-location completeness inherits the R1 evidence limits and is a conservative verified floor.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0421", "src-0422", "src-0423", "src-0014", "src-0429", "src-0430" ] }, { "stateCode": "ME", "stateName": "Maine", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "Multiple providers offer at least three approaches, including circles, mediated conversations, and restorative school/justice referrals.", "confidence": "Medium — current provider evidence supports the functional classification.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0421", "src-0422", "src-0423", "src-0014" ] }, { "stateCode": "ME", "stateName": "Maine", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "Youth Led Justice accepts school-disciplinary cases into restorative diversion; other contracted providers accept school referrals.", "confidence": "Medium — current provider evidence supports the functional classification.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0421", "src-0422", "src-0423", "src-0014" ] }, { "stateCode": "MD", "stateName": "Maryland", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Maryland law expressly defines restorative practices for student discipline and requires every county board's discipline regulations to provide for them. This current statewide youth recognition satisfies LB1.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0431", "src-0432" ] }, { "stateCode": "MD", "stateName": "Maryland", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Education § 7-306 gives a detailed restorative definition, identifies restorative models, mandates statewide regulatory inclusion, requires state technical assistance, and requires annual use reporting. This significant youth focus earns 2 points.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0431" ] }, { "stateCode": "MD", "stateName": "Maryland", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Education § 7-306 is permanent codified law with no pilot term, sunset, or expiration. Maryland earns 2 points.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0431" ] }, { "stateCode": "MD", "stateName": "Maryland", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "The law requires every county board's discipline regulations to provide for restorative practices, but it does not require consideration or an offer in any individual disciplinary case. LB4 is 0.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0431" ] }, { "stateCode": "MD", "stateName": "Maryland", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Education § 7-306 requires each county board to adopt implementing discipline regulations containing restorative practices; misconduct eligibility is locally governed without a statewide offense floor.", "confidence": "High for Legal and GA3; Medium for GA1/GA4", "sourceIds": [ "src-0433", "src-0434", "src-0435" ] }, { "stateCode": "MD", "stateName": "Maryland", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Prior-discipline and prior-contact eligibility are likewise delegated through county regulations without a statewide floor.", "confidence": "High for Legal and GA3; Medium for GA1/GA4", "sourceIds": [ "src-0433", "src-0434", "src-0435" ] }, { "stateCode": "MD", "stateName": "Maryland", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Maryland’s state-administered Performance Incentive Grant Fund authorizes adult diversion programming that expressly includes mediation and restorative justice; the statute is not youth-limited.", "confidence": "Medium-high — direct statewide authority/program review under the revised LA3 rule.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0436" ] }, { "stateCode": "MD", "stateName": "Maryland", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA4", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Education § 7-306 guarantees no nonfiling, dismissal, sealing, or expungement for successful restorative participation. The mandatory dismissal for generic informal adjustment is not expressly tied to RJ and therefore cannot be imported. LA4 is 0.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0431", "src-0437" ] }, { "stateCode": "MD", "stateName": "Maryland", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "The Maryland Judiciary's MACRO grant function and DJS have explicit restorative roles within existing state institutions.", "confidence": "High for Legal and GA3; Medium for GA1/GA4", "sourceIds": [ "src-0433", "src-0434", "src-0435" ] }, { "stateCode": "MD", "stateName": "Maryland", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "No formal public state–local body substantively dedicated to qualifying youth restorative justice was located.", "confidence": "Medium — Grant partnerships do not by themselves constitute a governance body.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0438", "src-0439", "src-0440" ] }, { "stateCode": "MD", "stateName": "Maryland", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "State law requires the State Board to provide restorative-practice technical assistance and training to county boards on request, and current state grant/resources support implementation.", "confidence": "High for Legal and GA3; Medium for GA1/GA4", "sourceIds": [ "src-0433", "src-0434", "src-0435" ] }, { "stateCode": "MD", "stateName": "Maryland", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Annual statewide discipline reporting includes identifiable restorative-practice use, while public youth-RJ provider outcomes and funding are not consistently isolated.", "confidence": "High for Legal and GA3; Medium for GA1/GA4", "sourceIds": [ "src-0433", "src-0434", "src-0435" ] }, { "stateCode": "MD", "stateName": "Maryland", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "The Maryland Judiciary operates a recurring state MACRO Restorative Justice Grant program, and a current MACRO-funded center identifies youth justice referrals from DJS and police. Because the grant category covers restorative work in schools, communities, and both criminal and juvenile conflicts, the youth share is not the program's sole purpose. A separately identified restorative grant with a verified youth component supports tier 2.", "confidence": "Medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0441", "src-0442", "src-0443" ] }, { "stateCode": "MD", "stateName": "Maryland", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "MACRO operates a dedicated recurring Restorative Justice Grant program and current provider evidence verifies one qualifying youth-referral center, supporting F2=3 and F3=1. A complete current youth-qualifying grantee roster was not located, so no additional funded jurisdictions are counted.", "confidence": "Medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0441", "src-0442", "src-0443" ] }, { "stateCode": "MD", "stateName": "Maryland", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "MACRO operates a dedicated recurring Restorative Justice Grant program and current provider evidence verifies one qualifying youth-referral center, supporting F2=3 and F3=1. A complete current youth-qualifying grantee roster was not located, so no additional funded jurisdictions are counted.", "confidence": "Medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0441", "src-0442", "src-0443" ] }, { "stateCode": "MD", "stateName": "Maryland", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "$1.78", "scoreNumeric": 1.78, "reasoning": "FY2025 Title II allocation $726,537 ÷ 408,209 eligible residents ages 13–17 (statutory minimum age 13) = $1.78 per eligible youth. Full precision is retained for scoring.", "confidence": "High — official FY2025 allocation table, verified jurisdiction ages, and 2024 Census single-year-age estimates.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0016", "src-0444", "src-0445" ] }, { "stateCode": "MD", "stateName": "Maryland", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "13%", "scoreNumeric": 0.13, "reasoning": "3 / 24 = 12.50%", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0446", "src-0447", "src-0448", "src-0449", "src-0450", "src-0451", "src-0452", "src-0453" ] }, { "stateCode": "MD", "stateName": "Maryland", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "29%", "scoreNumeric": 0.29, "reasoning": "Eligible-age population in verified R1 operating-location counties is 118,856 of 408,209 statewide residents ages 13–17, or 29.12%. Provider locations counted: Anne Arundel County, Baltimore County, Howard County. Claimed service areas were not substituted for physical operating locations.", "confidence": "High for the population calculation; provider-location completeness inherits the R1 evidence limits and is a conservative verified floor.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0446", "src-0447", "src-0448", "src-0449", "src-0450", "src-0451", "src-0452", "src-0453", "src-0454", "src-0455" ] }, { "stateCode": "MD", "stateName": "Maryland", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "The three verified current providers establish one functional family: community conferencing/restorative dialogue. No independently verified second functional approach was found in the completed protocol.", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0446", "src-0447", "src-0448", "src-0449", "src-0450", "src-0451", "src-0452", "src-0453" ] }, { "stateCode": "MD", "stateName": "Maryland", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "Anne Arundel County's current formal Community Conferencing referral program is expressly designed both to divert first-time nonviolent youth from juvenile justice and to reduce school suspension and expulsion; affected people collectively resolve the incident and repair harm.", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0446", "src-0447", "src-0448", "src-0449", "src-0450", "src-0451", "src-0452", "src-0453" ] }, { "stateCode": "MA", "stateName": "Massachusetts", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Massachusetts has a dedicated Restorative Justice chapter that expressly applies community-based RJ to juvenile defendants. The current enacted recognition satisfies LB1.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0456", "src-0457" ] }, { "stateCode": "MA", "stateName": "Massachusetts", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Chapter 276B provides a detailed RJ definition, youth applicability, case stages, consent requirements, exclusions, confidentiality, completion consequences, and statewide advisory infrastructure. This substantial youth focus earns 2 points.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0456", "src-0457", "src-0458" ] }, { "stateCode": "MA", "stateName": "Massachusetts", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Chapter 276B is permanent codified law with no pilot term, sunset, or expiration. Massachusetts earns 2 points.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0456", "src-0457" ] }, { "stateCode": "MA", "stateName": "Massachusetts", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "A juvenile may be diverted to RJ with district-attorney and victim consent, and participation is voluntary. The statute does not require decision-makers to consider or offer RJ, so LB4 is 0.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0459" ] }, { "stateCode": "MA", "stateName": "Massachusetts", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "Chapter 276B excludes specified sexual, household-member, serious-injury, and death-resulting offenses while leaving selected serious matters legally eligible.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0460", "src-0461", "src-0462" ] }, { "stateCode": "MA", "stateName": "Massachusetts", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "The completed controlling-law search found no meaningful statewide prior-contact rule.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0460", "src-0461", "src-0462" ] }, { "stateCode": "MA", "stateName": "Massachusetts", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "General Laws Chapter 276B, §2 expressly permits a juvenile or adult defendant to be diverted to a community-based restorative justice program before arraignment or at any later stage with required consent.", "confidence": "High — direct statewide authority/program review under the revised LA3 rule.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0463" ] }, { "stateCode": "MA", "stateName": "Massachusetts", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Chapter 276B requires dismissal of the charge when a juvenile successfully completes the community-based restorative justice program. The guaranteed RJ-specific dismissal earns 2 points.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0459" ] }, { "stateCode": "MA", "stateName": "Massachusetts", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "The state court/agency structure administers a statutory community-based restorative-justice pathway.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0460", "src-0461", "src-0462" ] }, { "stateCode": "MA", "stateName": "Massachusetts", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "The statutory Restorative Justice Advisory Committee is active, formally includes state and community representatives, and met repeatedly in 2025.", "confidence": "High — The committee spans adult and youth settings, but juvenile and youth restorative justice are explicit parts of its mandate.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0464", "src-0465", "src-0466" ] }, { "stateCode": "MA", "stateName": "Massachusetts", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Recurring state grant guidance and implementation materials support community restorative programs.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0460", "src-0461", "src-0462" ] }, { "stateCode": "MA", "stateName": "Massachusetts", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "4", "scoreNumeric": 4, "reasoning": "Recurring state reporting and statutory evaluation produce formal findings and recommendations.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0460", "src-0461", "src-0462" ] }, { "stateCode": "MA", "stateName": "Massachusetts", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "The enacted FY2026 municipal juvenile-diversion grant line provides $515,000 for multidisciplinary diversion and expressly includes restorative justice and mediation among the funded program types. The appropriation is broader youth diversion funding and its restorative share is inseparable, so tier 1 applies.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0467", "src-0468" ] }, { "stateCode": "MA", "stateName": "Massachusetts", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "The annual municipal juvenile-diversion grant line is a dedicated recurring mechanism whose current and prior appropriations expressly include restorative justice and mediation. The final current recipient roster and the subset receiving qualifying restorative funding are not publicly resolved, so F3 remains M.", "confidence": "Medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0467", "src-0468" ] }, { "stateCode": "MA", "stateName": "Massachusetts", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F3", "status": "unknown", "statusLabel": "Unknown", "scoreDisplay": "M", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "The annual municipal juvenile-diversion grant line is a dedicated recurring mechanism whose current and prior appropriations expressly include restorative justice and mediation. The final current recipient roster and the subset receiving qualifying restorative funding are not publicly resolved, so F3 remains M.", "confidence": "Medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0467", "src-0468" ] }, { "stateCode": "MA", "stateName": "Massachusetts", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "$0.93", "scoreNumeric": 0.93, "reasoning": "FY2025 Title II allocation $450,522 ÷ 485,154 eligible residents ages 12–17 (statutory minimum age 12) = $0.93 per eligible youth. Full precision is retained for scoring.", "confidence": "High — official FY2025 allocation table, verified jurisdiction ages, and 2024 Census single-year-age estimates.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0016", "src-0469", "src-0470" ] }, { "stateCode": "MA", "stateName": "Massachusetts", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "57%", "scoreNumeric": 0.57, "reasoning": "8 / 14 = 57.14%", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0471", "src-0472", "src-0473", "src-0474", "src-0475", "src-0476", "src-0477", "src-0478", "src-0479" ] }, { "stateCode": "MA", "stateName": "Massachusetts", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "65%", "scoreNumeric": 0.65, "reasoning": "Eligible-age population in verified R1 operating-location counties is 317,082 of 485,154 statewide residents ages 12–17, or 65.36%. Provider locations counted: Barnstable County, Berkshire County, Dukes County, Essex County, Franklin County, Middlesex County, Norfolk County, Worcester County. Claimed service areas were not substituted for physical operating locations.", "confidence": "High for the population calculation; provider-location completeness inherits the R1 evidence limits and is a conservative verified floor.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0471", "src-0472", "src-0473", "src-0474", "src-0475", "src-0476", "src-0477", "src-0478", "src-0479", "src-0480", "src-0481" ] }, { "stateCode": "MA", "stateName": "Massachusetts", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "Current partner-level evidence verifies at least three distinct approaches distributed across independent providers and jurisdictions: peer mediation, restorative/listening circles, conflict coaching, harm conferencing/re-entry mediation, and juvenile-court mediation or restorative referral. The Resolution Center, Community Dispute Settlement Center, and Cape Mediation each document multiple current youth approaches.", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0471", "src-0472", "src-0473", "src-0474", "src-0475", "src-0476", "src-0477", "src-0478", "src-0479" ] }, { "stateCode": "MA", "stateName": "Massachusetts", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Current partner evidence documents substantive school-linked restorative responses, including facilitated restorative circles, harm conferencing, re-entry mediation, and peer mediation. These go beyond informal conflict resolution, but no formal statewide or local route replacing police/court processing was verified.", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0471", "src-0472", "src-0473", "src-0474", "src-0475", "src-0476", "src-0477", "src-0478", "src-0479" ] }, { "stateCode": "MI", "stateName": "Michigan", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Michigan law expressly defines restorative practices for pupil misconduct and requires school decision-makers to consider them in disciplinary cases. LB1 is 1.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0482" ] }, { "stateCode": "MI", "stateName": "Michigan", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "The statute is dedicated to youth school discipline and supplies a detailed restorative process, mandatory consideration, specified example offenses, and written agreements. This substantial youth focus earns 2 points.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0482", "src-0483" ] }, { "stateCode": "MI", "stateName": "Michigan", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "The restorative-practices law has been effective since August 1, 2017 and contains no pilot term, sunset, or expiration. Michigan earns 2 points.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0482" ] }, { "stateCode": "MI", "stateName": "Michigan", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Michigan requires a school board or designee to consider restorative practices whether it suspends, expels, or chooses neither sanction. Required consideration earns 2 points.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0482", "src-0483" ] }, { "stateCode": "MI", "stateName": "Michigan", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "State law expressly prioritizes restorative practices for theft, property damage, bullying, harassment, and physical conflicts, making selected serious/person conduct eligible.", "confidence": "High for Legal; Medium for Governance", "sourceIds": [ "src-0484", "src-0485", "src-0486" ] }, { "stateCode": "MI", "stateName": "Michigan", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "4", "scoreNumeric": 4, "reasoning": "Disciplinary history must be considered individually alongside restorative practices and is not an automatic statewide disqualifier.", "confidence": "High for Legal; Medium for Governance", "sourceIds": [ "src-0484", "src-0485", "src-0486" ] }, { "stateCode": "MI", "stateName": "Michigan", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA3", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "A completed current search found school-based RJ, generic adult diversion, and judicial recommendations to expand restorative justice, but no current statewide adult pathway authorizing a new qualifying restorative referral. Current MDOC programming and victim-services pages do not offer VOD or an equivalent process.", "confidence": "High — direct statewide authority/program review under the revised LA3 rule.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0487", "src-0488" ] }, { "stateCode": "MI", "stateName": "Michigan", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA4", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Michigan requires consideration and permits a signed restorative agreement but guarantees no nonfiling, dismissal, sealing, or expungement after completion. LA4 is 0.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0482" ] }, { "stateCode": "MI", "stateName": "Michigan", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Existing state education and youth-justice agencies have explicit restorative roles.", "confidence": "High for Legal; Medium for Governance", "sourceIds": [ "src-0484", "src-0485", "src-0486" ] }, { "stateCode": "MI", "stateName": "Michigan", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "No formal public state–local body substantively dedicated to qualifying youth restorative justice was located.", "confidence": "Medium — Local dispute-resolution networks are implementation providers, not a youth-RJ governance body.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0489", "src-0490", "src-0491" ] }, { "stateCode": "MI", "stateName": "Michigan", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Current statutory guidance and state implementation resources support restorative school discipline.", "confidence": "High for Legal; Medium for Governance", "sourceIds": [ "src-0484", "src-0485", "src-0486" ] }, { "stateCode": "MI", "stateName": "Michigan", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Broader recurring discipline/grant monitoring covers a system with an identifiable restorative component but does not separately publish restorative outcomes.", "confidence": "High for Legal; Medium for Governance", "sourceIds": [ "src-0484", "src-0485", "src-0486" ] }, { "stateCode": "MI", "stateName": "Michigan", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Michigan's State Court Administrative Office makes annual grants to 16 Community Dispute Resolution centers. The 2025 official report states that funded centers provide juvenile restorative processes with prosecutors and schools, victim-offender conferencing, and restorative interventions. Because annual grants fund a broad dispute-resolution portfolio and the juvenile-restorative share is inseparable, tier 1 applies.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0492" ] }, { "stateCode": "MI", "stateName": "Michigan", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "The State Court Administrative Office makes annual grants to the 16-center Community Dispute Resolution network, and current reporting identifies juvenile restorative processes within that funded system. The recurring annual center-grant mechanism supports F2=3; the funded network operates statewide through centers covering Michigan's counties, supporting F3=3.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0492" ] }, { "stateCode": "MI", "stateName": "Michigan", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "The State Court Administrative Office makes annual grants to the 16-center Community Dispute Resolution network, and current reporting identifies juvenile restorative processes within that funded system. The recurring annual center-grant mechanism supports F2=3; the funded network operates statewide through centers covering Michigan's counties, supporting F3=3.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0492" ] }, { "stateCode": "MI", "stateName": "Michigan", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "$1.19", "scoreNumeric": 1.19, "reasoning": "FY2025 Title II allocation $1,186,498 ÷ 996,269 eligible residents ages 10–17 (age 10 fallback because no general statutory minimum was identified) = $1.19 per eligible youth. Full precision is retained for scoring.", "confidence": "High — official FY2025 allocation table, verified jurisdiction ages, and 2024 Census single-year-age estimates.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0016", "src-0493", "src-0494" ] }, { "stateCode": "MI", "stateName": "Michigan", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "19%", "scoreNumeric": 0.19, "reasoning": "16 / 83 = 19.28%", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0495", "src-0496", "src-0497" ] }, { "stateCode": "MI", "stateName": "Michigan", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "66%", "scoreNumeric": 0.66, "reasoning": "Eligible-age population in verified R1 operating-location counties is 656,369 of 996,269 statewide residents ages 10–17, or 65.88%. Provider locations counted: Berrien County, Delta County, Eaton County, Emmet County, Genesee County, Grand Traverse County, Jackson County, Kent County, Macomb County, Marquette County, Muskegon County, Oakland County, Otsego County, Ottawa County, Washtenaw County, Wayne County. Claimed service areas were not substituted for physical operating locations.", "confidence": "High for the population calculation; provider-location completeness inherits the R1 evidence limits and is a conservative verified floor.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0495", "src-0496", "src-0497", "src-0498", "src-0499" ] }, { "stateCode": "MI", "stateName": "Michigan", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "The 16-center network independently delivers mediation/victim-offender conferencing, conflict coaching, and restorative circles across multiple providers and jurisdictions.", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0495", "src-0496", "src-0497" ] }, { "stateCode": "MI", "stateName": "Michigan", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "The 2025 report documents formal school referrals and restorative programs used instead of suspension/expulsion, averting nearly 2,000 suspension days.", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0495", "src-0496", "src-0497" ] }, { "stateCode": "MN", "stateName": "Minnesota", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Minnesota expressly establishes a restorative justice process for first-time juvenile petty offenders. LB1 is 1.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0500" ] }, { "stateCode": "MN", "stateName": "Minnesota", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Section 609.092 is a dedicated youth-RJ law detailing referrals, victim or proxy involvement, written sanctions, provider lists, culturally specific preferences, exclusions, and dismissal. It earns 2 points.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0500" ] }, { "stateCode": "MN", "stateName": "Minnesota", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Section 609.092 has remained codified since 2009 without a pilot term, sunset, or expiration. Minnesota earns 2 points.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0500" ] }, { "stateCode": "MN", "stateName": "Minnesota", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "For a qualifying first-time juvenile petty offender in a jurisdiction with an available program, the prosecutor shall refer the child to an approved restorative justice provider. Required offer/referral earns 3 points.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0500" ] }, { "stateCode": "MN", "stateName": "Minnesota", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "The mandatory pathway is limited to juvenile petty offenders and excludes domestic-violence and domestic-assault cases.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0501", "src-0502", "src-0503" ] }, { "stateCode": "MN", "stateName": "Minnesota", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "The law expressly excludes youth with specified prior adjudications, diversion, probation-without-adjudication, or continuance history, making the pathway first-time-only.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0501", "src-0502", "src-0503" ] }, { "stateCode": "MN", "stateName": "Minnesota", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Minnesota DOC administers a statewide victim-initiated restorative-practices program, including Victim Offender Dialogue, for adult post-conviction cases; current law also authorizes mediation grants for adult nonviolent offenders.", "confidence": "High — direct statewide authority/program review under the revised LA3 rule.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0504", "src-0505" ] }, { "stateCode": "MN", "stateName": "Minnesota", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Upon successful completion of the written restorative sanctions, the provider must notify the court and the court must dismiss the charge. The guaranteed dismissal earns 2 points.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0500" ] }, { "stateCode": "MN", "stateName": "Minnesota", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "Minnesota operates a dedicated Office of Restorative Practices.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0501", "src-0502", "src-0503" ] }, { "stateCode": "MN", "stateName": "Minnesota", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "The Office of Restorative Practices coordinates active local advisory committees across numerous counties and jurisdictions.", "confidence": "High — Not every county currently has an advisory committee.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0506", "src-0507", "src-0508" ] }, { "stateCode": "MN", "stateName": "Minnesota", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "The office provides substantial grants, training, implementation infrastructure, and statewide assistance.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0501", "src-0502", "src-0503" ] }, { "stateCode": "MN", "stateName": "Minnesota", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "4", "scoreNumeric": 4, "reasoning": "Recurring program reporting produces public findings, recommendations, and formal accountability.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0501", "src-0502", "src-0503" ] }, { "stateCode": "MN", "stateName": "Minnesota", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Minnesota's Office of Restorative Practices has made separately identified restorative-practices awards, including youth-justice initiatives such as Ramsey County's community-accountability diversion work. The current initiative is entirely restorative-practices funding, but the statewide award pool mixes justice, school, Tribal, human-services, community, and reentry uses; only identified qualifying youth awards count. Tier 2 is therefore more defensible than tier 3.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0509", "src-0510", "src-0511" ] }, { "stateCode": "MN", "stateName": "Minnesota", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "The Office of Restorative Practices administers a dedicated state restorative-practices grant program with actual awards in successive current rounds. F2 is 3. Current award records identify qualifying youth-justice restorative projects in multiple local units, but the qualifying subset is not verified across at least 80% of counties, so F3 is 2.", "confidence": "Medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0509", "src-0510", "src-0511" ] }, { "stateCode": "MN", "stateName": "Minnesota", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "The Office of Restorative Practices administers a dedicated state restorative-practices grant program with actual awards in successive current rounds. F2 is 3. Current award records identify qualifying youth-justice restorative projects in multiple local units, but the qualifying subset is not verified across at least 80% of counties, so F3 is 2.", "confidence": "Medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0509", "src-0510", "src-0511" ] }, { "stateCode": "MN", "stateName": "Minnesota", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "$2.15", "scoreNumeric": 2.15, "reasoning": "FY2025 Title II allocation $837,045 ÷ 388,432 eligible residents ages 13–17 (statutory minimum age 13) = $2.15 per eligible youth. Full precision is retained for scoring.", "confidence": "High — official FY2025 allocation table, verified jurisdiction ages, and 2024 Census single-year-age estimates.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0016", "src-0512", "src-0513" ] }, { "stateCode": "MN", "stateName": "Minnesota", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "23%", "scoreNumeric": 0.23, "reasoning": "20 of 87 county-equivalents contain at least one verified current youth-RJ operating location (22.99%; entered as 23%). The January 2026 state restorative-services directory was used to generate leads, then each counted county was tied to a current county, state, or provider page that verifies youth focus, a repair-of-harm/dialogue component, and a physical operating address. Promising leads in Goodhue, Roseau, Steele, Chisago, and several school/tribal systems were not counted when current program operations at a physical county location could not be independently established.", "confidence": "High for the 20-count floor; conservative rather than exhaustive for every potentially qualifying school or tribal program", "sourceIds": [ "src-0514", "src-0515", "src-0516", "src-0517", "src-0518", "src-0519", "src-0520", "src-0521", "src-0522", "src-0523", "src-0524", "src-0525", "src-0526", "src-0527", "src-0528", "src-0529", "src-0530", "src-0531", "src-0532", "src-0533", "src-0534", "src-0535", "src-0536", "src-0537", "src-0538", "src-0539", "src-0540", "src-0541", "src-0542", "src-0543", "src-0544", "src-0545" ] }, { "stateCode": "MN", "stateName": "Minnesota", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "57%", "scoreNumeric": 0.57, "reasoning": "Eligible-age population in verified R1 operating-location counties is 221,959 of 388,432 statewide residents ages 13–17, or 57.14%. Provider locations counted: Anoka County, Beltrami County, Carlton County, Cass County, Clay County, Cook County, Crow Wing County, Hennepin County, Kandiyohi County, Olmsted County, Pine County, Ramsey County, Redwood County, Renville County, St. Louis County, Swift County, Washington County, Winona County, Wright County, Yellow Medicine County. Claimed service areas were not substituted for physical operating locations.", "confidence": "High for the population calculation; provider-location completeness inherits the R1 evidence limits and is a conservative verified floor.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0514", "src-0515", "src-0516", "src-0517", "src-0518", "src-0519", "src-0520", "src-0521", "src-0522", "src-0523", "src-0524", "src-0525", "src-0526", "src-0527", "src-0528", "src-0529", "src-0530", "src-0531", "src-0532", "src-0533", "src-0534", "src-0535", "src-0536", "src-0537", "src-0538", "src-0539", "src-0540", "src-0541", "src-0542", "src-0543", "src-0544", "src-0545", "src-0546", "src-0547" ] }, { "stateCode": "MN", "stateName": "Minnesota", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "Current state-funded work verifies distributed restorative circles, community-accountability conferencing, culturally grounded/Tribal healing practices, schoolwide restorative practice, and survivor-centered programming across multiple organizations and jurisdictions.", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0548", "src-0549", "src-0550", "src-0551" ] }, { "stateCode": "MN", "stateName": "Minnesota", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Buffalo High School and Fond du Lac Ojibwe School currently use restorative circles and accountability/healing responses to behavioral incidents; no formal school-to-court diversion substitution was verified.", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0548", "src-0549", "src-0550", "src-0551" ] }, { "stateCode": "MS", "stateName": "Mississippi", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB1", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "The completed current-law search found no enacted, operative statewide Mississippi law expressly recognizing youth RJ. The 2026 reform failed and the agency framework is guidance, so LB1 is 0.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0552", "src-0553", "src-0554" ] }, { "stateCode": "MS", "stateName": "Mississippi", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Mississippi's completed current enacted-law search found no qualifying youth-specific restorative-justice recognition. LB2's live scale has no X outcome, so the correct classification is Verified absence/0. Because LB2=0, LB3, LB4, and LA1-LA4 remain Structural N/A/X under the live gateway.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0552" ] }, { "stateCode": "MS", "stateName": "Mississippi", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB3", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Mississippi's LB1 gateway is 0, so duration cannot be assessed for a nonexistent statewide youth-RJ authority. LB3 is Structural N/A/X.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0552" ] }, { "stateCode": "MS", "stateName": "Mississippi", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB4", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Mississippi's LB1 gateway is 0, so referral-directive strength for a statewide youth-RJ mechanism cannot be evaluated. LB4 is Structural N/A/X.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0552" ] }, { "stateCode": "MS", "stateName": "Mississippi", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA1", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "The live LB2 gateway is not satisfied.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0555", "src-0556" ] }, { "stateCode": "MS", "stateName": "Mississippi", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA2", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "The live LB2 gateway is not satisfied.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0555", "src-0556" ] }, { "stateCode": "MS", "stateName": "Mississippi", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA3", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "A completed search of current Mississippi statutes, Department of Corrections programs, victim services, and state court materials found no statewide adult referral to a qualifying restorative process.", "confidence": "Medium-high — direct statewide authority/program review under the revised LA3 rule.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0557", "src-0558" ] }, { "stateCode": "MS", "stateName": "Mississippi", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA4", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Mississippi has no qualifying statewide youth-RJ pathway to which a completion benefit could attach. LA4 is Structural N/A/X.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0552" ] }, { "stateCode": "MS", "stateName": "Mississippi", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA1", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "The completed current official-source search found no state actor with an explicit qualifying youth-RJ role.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0555", "src-0556" ] }, { "stateCode": "MS", "stateName": "Mississippi", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "No formal public state–local body substantively dedicated to youth restorative justice was located.", "confidence": "High — No enacted committee or public coordinating council was found.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0559", "src-0560" ] }, { "stateCode": "MS", "stateName": "Mississippi", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA3", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "No current state youth-RJ implementation support was found.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0555", "src-0556" ] }, { "stateCode": "MS", "stateName": "Mississippi", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA4", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "No recurring relevant state monitoring was found.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0555", "src-0556" ] }, { "stateCode": "MS", "stateName": "Mississippi", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F1", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "The completed state budget, juvenile-justice, grant, procurement, restorative-process, and legal search found no current state-origin youth restorative award or operating allocation. A proposed 2026 bill and a local nonprofit initiative are excluded.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0561", "src-0562" ] }, { "stateCode": "MS", "stateName": "Mississippi", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Revised F1 is Verified absence / 0 after the completed state-origin funding search. Under the live dependency rule, F2 is Structural N/A / X; excluded federal, school-only, local-only, generic-diversion, proposed, or out-of-period funding is not reused.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0561", "src-0562" ] }, { "stateCode": "MS", "stateName": "Mississippi", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F3", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Revised F1 is Verified absence / 0 after the completed state-origin funding search. Under the live dependency rule, F3 is Structural N/A / X; excluded federal, school-only, local-only, generic-diversion, proposed, or out-of-period funding is not reused.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0561", "src-0562" ] }, { "stateCode": "MS", "stateName": "Mississippi", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "$2.08", "scoreNumeric": 2.08, "reasoning": "FY2025 Title II allocation $662,918 ÷ 318,674 eligible residents ages 10–17 (age 10 fallback because no general statutory minimum was identified) = $2.08 per eligible youth. Full precision is retained for scoring.", "confidence": "High — official FY2025 allocation table, verified jurisdiction ages, and 2024 Census single-year-age estimates.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0016", "src-0563", "src-0564" ] }, { "stateCode": "MS", "stateName": "Mississippi", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R1", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0%", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "0 / 82 = 0.00%", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0565", "src-0566", "src-0567", "src-0568" ] }, { "stateCode": "MS", "stateName": "Mississippi", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "0%", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Eligible-age population in verified R1 operating-location counties is 0 of 318,674 statewide residents ages 10–17, or 0.00%. Provider locations counted: no verified provider counties. Claimed service areas were not substituted for physical operating locations.", "confidence": "High for the population calculation; provider-location completeness inherits the R1 evidence limits and is a conservative verified floor.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0565", "src-0566", "src-0567", "src-0568", "src-0569", "src-0570" ] }, { "stateCode": "MS", "stateName": "Mississippi", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R3", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "No qualifying current operating youth-RJ provider was verified after the complete protocol, so functional approach classification is structurally not applicable.", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0565", "src-0566", "src-0567", "src-0568" ] }, { "stateCode": "MS", "stateName": "Mississippi", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R4", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "The completed protocol found no current operational school-linked youth-RJ alternative. SOCIETY's school mental-health and social-emotional-learning advocacy does not document an operating RJ discipline or diversion route.", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0565", "src-0566", "src-0567", "src-0568" ] }, { "stateCode": "MO", "stateName": "Missouri", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB1", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Missouri has current adult restorative-justice authority but the completed enacted-law search found no operative statewide youth-RJ mechanism. LB1 is 0.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0571", "src-0572" ] }, { "stateCode": "MO", "stateName": "Missouri", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Missouri's completed current enacted-law search found no qualifying youth-specific restorative-justice recognition. LB2's live scale has no X outcome, so the correct classification is Verified absence/0. Because LB2=0, LB3, LB4, and LA1-LA4 remain Structural N/A/X under the live gateway.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0571" ] }, { "stateCode": "MO", "stateName": "Missouri", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB3", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Missouri's LB1 gateway is 0, so duration cannot be assessed for a nonexistent statewide youth-RJ authority. LB3 is Structural N/A/X.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0571" ] }, { "stateCode": "MO", "stateName": "Missouri", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB4", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Missouri's LB1 gateway is 0, so referral-directive strength for a statewide youth-RJ mechanism cannot be evaluated. LB4 is Structural N/A/X.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0571" ] }, { "stateCode": "MO", "stateName": "Missouri", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA1", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "The live LB2 gateway is not satisfied.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0573", "src-0574" ] }, { "stateCode": "MO", "stateName": "Missouri", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA2", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "The live LB2 gateway is not satisfied.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0573", "src-0574" ] }, { "stateCode": "MO", "stateName": "Missouri", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Mo. Rev. Stat. §217.777 requires the Department of Corrections to administer community-based restorative justice projects for adults and authorizes court referrals to community boards using victim-offender mediation, accountability, and restitution.", "confidence": "High — direct statewide authority/program review under the revised LA3 rule.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0575" ] }, { "stateCode": "MO", "stateName": "Missouri", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA4", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Missouri has no qualifying statewide youth-RJ pathway to which a completion benefit could attach. LA4 is Structural N/A/X.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0571" ] }, { "stateCode": "MO", "stateName": "Missouri", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA1", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "No state actor with an explicit qualifying youth-RJ responsibility was found after the completed protocol.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0573", "src-0574" ] }, { "stateCode": "MO", "stateName": "Missouri", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "No formal public state–local body substantively dedicated to youth restorative justice was located.", "confidence": "Medium — Local youth courts and providers do not create a statewide body.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0576", "src-0577", "src-0578" ] }, { "stateCode": "MO", "stateName": "Missouri", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA3", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Current state training standards and juvenile materials do not provide qualifying youth-RJ implementation support.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0573", "src-0574" ] }, { "stateCode": "MO", "stateName": "Missouri", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA4", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "No recurring relevant public youth-RJ monitoring was verified.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0573", "src-0574" ] }, { "stateCode": "MO", "stateName": "Missouri", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F1", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Missouri funds local juvenile diversion, but the current state program records do not identify a restorative component in the funded mechanism. Local qualifying providers in St. Louis and Jackson County are not tied to state-origin awards. The completed protocol therefore supports 0.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0579", "src-0580" ] }, { "stateCode": "MO", "stateName": "Missouri", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Revised F1 is Verified absence / 0 after the completed state-origin funding search. Under the live dependency rule, F2 is Structural N/A / X; excluded federal, school-only, local-only, generic-diversion, proposed, or out-of-period funding is not reused.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0579", "src-0580" ] }, { "stateCode": "MO", "stateName": "Missouri", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F3", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Revised F1 is Verified absence / 0 after the completed state-origin funding search. Under the live dependency rule, F3 is Structural N/A / X; excluded federal, school-only, local-only, generic-diversion, proposed, or out-of-period funding is not reused.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0579", "src-0580" ] }, { "stateCode": "MO", "stateName": "Missouri", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "$1.38", "scoreNumeric": 1.38, "reasoning": "FY2025 Title II allocation $884,403 ÷ 642,214 eligible residents ages 10–17 (age 10 fallback because no general statutory minimum was identified) = $1.38 per eligible youth. Full precision is retained for scoring.", "confidence": "High — official FY2025 allocation table, verified jurisdiction ages, and 2024 Census single-year-age estimates.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0016", "src-0581", "src-0582" ] }, { "stateCode": "MO", "stateName": "Missouri", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2%", "scoreNumeric": 0.02, "reasoning": "2 / 115 = 1.74%", "confidence": "medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0583", "src-0584", "src-0585", "src-0586", "src-0587" ] }, { "stateCode": "MO", "stateName": "Missouri", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "15%", "scoreNumeric": 0.15, "reasoning": "Eligible-age population in verified R1 operating-location counties is 97,497 of 642,214 statewide residents ages 10–17, or 15.18%. Provider locations counted: Jackson County, St. Louis city. Claimed service areas were not substituted for physical operating locations.", "confidence": "High for the population calculation; provider-location completeness inherits the R1 evidence limits and is a conservative verified floor.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0583", "src-0584", "src-0585", "src-0586", "src-0587", "src-0588", "src-0589" ] }, { "stateCode": "MO", "stateName": "Missouri", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Jackson County independently operates peer/youth-court restorative diversion while St. Louis PayBack operates restitution-through-community-work, two functionally distinct approaches across providers/jurisdictions.", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0583", "src-0584", "src-0585", "src-0586", "src-0587" ] }, { "stateCode": "MO", "stateName": "Missouri", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "Jackson County youth courts accept school-district referrals and provide a formal alternative to traditional juvenile justice; current COMBAT programs also replace exclusionary school responses.", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0583", "src-0584", "src-0585", "src-0586", "src-0587" ] }, { "stateCode": "MT", "stateName": "Montana", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Montana establishes statewide restorative-justice grants and expressly recognizes youth-applicable models including school-expulsion alternatives and peer mediation. LB1 is 1.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0590", "src-0591" ] }, { "stateCode": "MT", "stateName": "Montana", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "The grant law includes several youth-applicable mechanisms but serves criminal justice broadly rather than establishing detailed uniform youth case procedures. The brief/general youth focus earns 1 point.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0592" ] }, { "stateCode": "MT", "stateName": "Montana", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "The RJ grant provisions are permanent codified law with no pilot term, sunset, or expiration. Montana earns 2 points.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0590", "src-0591" ] }, { "stateCode": "MT", "stateName": "Montana", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Montana promotes RJ grants and technical assistance but imposes no case-level duty to consider or offer RJ to a youth. LB4 is 0.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0592" ] }, { "stateCode": "MT", "stateName": "Montana", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "MCA 44-7-301 limits the state-supported pathway to appropriate offenders at low risk for violence.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0593", "src-0594" ] }, { "stateCode": "MT", "stateName": "Montana", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "The completed controlling-law search found no meaningful statewide prior-contact rule.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0593", "src-0594" ] }, { "stateCode": "MT", "stateName": "Montana", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Montana DOC currently offers victim-initiated Victim Offender Dialogue statewide for people harmed by adult offenders; the facilitated process centers victim voice, offender accountability, and repair.", "confidence": "High — direct statewide authority/program review under the revised LA3 rule.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0595" ] }, { "stateCode": "MT", "stateName": "Montana", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA4", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Montana's grant law guarantees no nonfiling, dismissal, sealing, or expungement after youth RJ completion. LA4 is 0.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0590", "src-0591" ] }, { "stateCode": "MT", "stateName": "Montana", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "MBCC administers a state juvenile-grant framework expressly including restorative justice.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0593", "src-0594" ] }, { "stateCode": "MT", "stateName": "Montana", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "The Youth Justice Council joins state and local stakeholders and substantively supports youth restorative programming and training.", "confidence": "Medium — A current geographically diverse roster and recent RJ-focused meeting were not fully documented for tier 3.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0596", "src-0597", "src-0598" ] }, { "stateCode": "MT", "stateName": "Montana", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "Statute and MBCC infrastructure provide training, technical assistance, grants, and statewide implementation support.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0593", "src-0594" ] }, { "stateCode": "MT", "stateName": "Montana", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "Recurring public grant reporting provides jurisdiction/provider funding and activity detail.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0593", "src-0594" ] }, { "stateCode": "MT", "stateName": "Montana", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F1", "status": "unknown", "statusLabel": "Unknown", "scoreDisplay": "M", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Montana law creates a restorative-justice grant framework, and current reporting identifies active youth restorative initiatives. The official funding record reviewed, however, attributes the identified youth-RJ grants to federal Title II funds and does not establish a current state-origin award or operating allocation. Because the statutory fund remains a plausible state vehicle whose current use is unresolved, M is safer than either a positive score or verified absence.", "confidence": "Medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0599", "src-0600", "src-0601" ] }, { "stateCode": "MT", "stateName": "Montana", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F2", "status": "unknown", "statusLabel": "Unknown", "scoreDisplay": "M", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Current state-origin use of Montana's statutory restorative-justice grant vehicle remains unresolved; the identified youth awards are federal Title II grants. No recurrence or funded-unit score can be assigned safely.", "confidence": "Medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0599", "src-0600", "src-0601" ] }, { "stateCode": "MT", "stateName": "Montana", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F3", "status": "unknown", "statusLabel": "Unknown", "scoreDisplay": "M", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Current state-origin use of Montana's statutory restorative-justice grant vehicle remains unresolved; the identified youth awards are federal Title II grants. No recurrence or funded-unit score can be assigned safely.", "confidence": "Medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0599", "src-0600", "src-0601" ] }, { "stateCode": "MT", "stateName": "Montana", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "$5.58", "scoreNumeric": 5.58, "reasoning": "FY2025 Title II allocation $621,419 ÷ 111,349 eligible residents ages 10–17 (age 10 fallback because no general statutory minimum was identified) = $5.58 per eligible youth. Full precision is retained for scoring.", "confidence": "High — official FY2025 allocation table, verified jurisdiction ages, and 2024 Census single-year-age estimates.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0016", "src-0602", "src-0603" ] }, { "stateCode": "MT", "stateName": "Montana", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "4%", "scoreNumeric": 0.04, "reasoning": "2 / 56 = 3.57%", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0604", "src-0605", "src-0606", "src-0607" ] }, { "stateCode": "MT", "stateName": "Montana", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "20%", "scoreNumeric": 0.2, "reasoning": "Eligible-age population in verified R1 operating-location counties is 21,865 of 111,349 statewide residents ages 10–17, or 19.64%. Provider locations counted: Flathead County, Missoula County. Claimed service areas were not substituted for physical operating locations.", "confidence": "High for the population calculation; provider-location completeness inherits the R1 evidence limits and is a conservative verified floor.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0604", "src-0605", "src-0606", "src-0607", "src-0608", "src-0609" ] }, { "stateCode": "MT", "stateName": "Montana", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "One provider offers victim-offender conferences, community-impact circles, family conferences, and peer workshops across two counties; diversity remains within one provider system.", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0604", "src-0605", "src-0606", "src-0607" ] }, { "stateCode": "MT", "stateName": "Montana", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "CRYJ's School Justice Partnership accepts administrator/SRO referrals and completion avoids both exclusionary discipline and criminal charges.", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0604", "src-0605", "src-0606", "src-0607" ] }, { "stateCode": "NE", "stateName": "Nebraska", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Nebraska expressly authorizes restorative justice practices or services for juveniles at diversion, plea-negotiation, and disposition stages. LB1 is 1.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0610" ] }, { "stateCode": "NE", "stateName": "Nebraska", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "The law is a dedicated juvenile provision with detailed RJ referral, consent, assessment, agreement, monitoring, and completion rules. The significant youth focus earns 2.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0610" ] }, { "stateCode": "NE", "stateName": "Nebraska", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "The juvenile RJ provisions are permanent codified law with no pilot term, sunset, or expiration. Nebraska earns 2.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0610", "src-0611" ] }, { "stateCode": "NE", "stateName": "Nebraska", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "When deciding whether to offer juvenile RJ, the prosecutor shall consider the statutory factors, including whether the victim and juvenile agree to participate in RJ. Required case-level consideration earns 2.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0612", "src-0613" ] }, { "stateCode": "NE", "stateName": "Nebraska", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "4", "scoreNumeric": 4, "reasoning": "The statewide pathway reaches ordinary juvenile-jurisdiction categories and treats violence as one individualized factor rather than a categorical bar.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0614", "src-0615", "src-0616" ] }, { "stateCode": "NE", "stateName": "Nebraska", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "4", "scoreNumeric": 4, "reasoning": "Previous convictions or adjudications are one individualized factor and are not automatic exclusions.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0614", "src-0615", "src-0616" ] }, { "stateCode": "NE", "stateName": "Nebraska", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Nebraska DOC’s binding Restorative Justice Services policy establishes a victim-initiated dialogue program for incarcerated adults, requiring responsibility for harm and communication aimed at restoration and healing. Nebraska statutes also authorize adult criminal case referrals through approved mediation centers.", "confidence": "High — direct statewide authority/program review under the revised LA3 rule.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0617", "src-0618" ] }, { "stateCode": "NE", "stateName": "Nebraska", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Successful completion requires nonfiling when RJ was used as diversion or an alternative to diversion; a plea referral instead receives the previously agreed reduced charge. The guaranteed diversion-track nonfiling earns 2.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0610" ] }, { "stateCode": "NE", "stateName": "Nebraska", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Existing statewide probation/court administration has an explicit restorative role.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0614", "src-0615", "src-0616" ] }, { "stateCode": "NE", "stateName": "Nebraska", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "The formal court advisory and approved-center structure is active statewide and includes geographically diverse local centers.", "confidence": "High — Representation is strongest through approved mediation centers rather than county government seats.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0619", "src-0620", "src-0621" ] }, { "stateCode": "NE", "stateName": "Nebraska", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "Nebraska provides substantial statewide restorative-justice training and implementation infrastructure.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0614", "src-0615", "src-0616" ] }, { "stateCode": "NE", "stateName": "Nebraska", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "4", "scoreNumeric": 4, "reasoning": "Recurring statewide reports publish participation/outcome detail and formal recommendations/accountability.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0614", "src-0615", "src-0616" ] }, { "stateCode": "NE", "stateName": "Nebraska", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Nebraska law makes the state Office of Dispute Resolution responsible for funding and managing services delivered by approved mediation centers, and current Judicial Branch reporting verifies that the six-center system continues to deliver child and youth restorative justice after the time-limited federal youth initiative concluded. The operating support funds broader mediation-center portfolios and the youth-restorative share is inseparable, so tier 1 applies rather than tier 2 or 3.", "confidence": "Medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0622", "src-0623", "src-0624" ] }, { "stateCode": "NE", "stateName": "Nebraska", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "The Office of Dispute Resolution's statutory and annually reported approved-center funding is a dedicated recurring operating mechanism. The same funded six-center network supplies child and youth restorative services statewide, supporting F2=3 and F3=3.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0622", "src-0623", "src-0624" ] }, { "stateCode": "NE", "stateName": "Nebraska", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "The Office of Dispute Resolution's statutory and annually reported approved-center funding is a dedicated recurring operating mechanism. The same funded six-center network supplies child and youth restorative services statewide, supporting F2=3 and F3=3.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0622", "src-0623", "src-0624" ] }, { "stateCode": "NE", "stateName": "Nebraska", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "$1.95", "scoreNumeric": 1.95, "reasoning": "FY2025 Title II allocation $385,667 ÷ 197,334 eligible residents ages 11–17 (statutory minimum age 11) = $1.95 per eligible youth. Full precision is retained for scoring.", "confidence": "High — official FY2025 allocation table, verified jurisdiction ages, and 2024 Census single-year-age estimates.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0016", "src-0625", "src-0626" ] }, { "stateCode": "NE", "stateName": "Nebraska", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "6%", "scoreNumeric": 0.06, "reasoning": "6 / 93 = 6.45%", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0627", "src-0628", "src-0629", "src-0630", "src-0631" ] }, { "stateCode": "NE", "stateName": "Nebraska", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "53%", "scoreNumeric": 0.53, "reasoning": "Eligible-age population in verified R1 operating-location counties is 104,017 of 197,334 statewide residents ages 11–17, or 52.71%. Provider locations counted: Buffalo County, Dodge County, Douglas County, Gage County, Lancaster County, Scotts Bluff County. Claimed service areas were not substituted for physical operating locations.", "confidence": "High for the population calculation; provider-location completeness inherits the R1 evidence limits and is a conservative verified floor.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0627", "src-0628", "src-0629", "src-0630", "src-0631", "src-0632", "src-0633" ] }, { "stateCode": "NE", "stateName": "Nebraska", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "The six approved centers deliver victim-youth conferencing, family conferencing/family-group conferencing, and excessive-absenteeism conferencing across multiple providers and jurisdictions; the evidence does not cleanly establish three nonoverlapping functional families.", "confidence": "medium-high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0627", "src-0628", "src-0629", "src-0630", "src-0631" ] }, { "stateCode": "NE", "stateName": "Nebraska", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "Current K-12 referrals include school/truancy cases resolved through restorative conferencing and reparation or attendance plans as an alternative to court processing.", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0627", "src-0628", "src-0629", "src-0630", "src-0631" ] }, { "stateCode": "NV", "stateName": "Nevada", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Nevada expressly defines restorative justice and requires public schools to provide restorative discipline plans to covered pupils. LB1 is 1.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0634", "src-0635" ] }, { "stateCode": "NV", "stateName": "Nevada", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Nevada has detailed youth-specific provisions governing triggers, timing, plan contents, serious misconduct, reinstatement, and a statewide framework. The significant youth focus earns 2.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0634", "src-0635" ] }, { "stateCode": "NV", "stateName": "Nevada", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "The pupil-level RJ duties are permanent. Although one version of the statewide-framework section changes in 2028, a permanent successor takes effect without ending the RJ system. Nevada earns 2.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0634", "src-0635" ] }, { "stateCode": "NV", "stateName": "Nevada", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Nevada state law does not encourage or require consideration of restorative justice practices in juvenile cases. Referral is discretionary.", "confidence": "", "sourceIds": [ "src-0636" ] }, { "stateCode": "NV", "stateName": "Nevada", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "4", "scoreNumeric": 4, "reasoning": "State law requires restorative plans for ordinary discipline and expressly includes battery, weapons, controlled-substance distribution, and habitual-discipline categories without a broad exclusion.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0637", "src-0638" ] }, { "stateCode": "NV", "stateName": "Nevada", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "4", "scoreNumeric": 4, "reasoning": "Repeated discipline triggers restorative-plan duties rather than disqualification.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0637", "src-0638" ] }, { "stateCode": "NV", "stateName": "Nevada", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA3", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "A completed search of current Nevada statutes, corrections programs, victim services, and court ADR materials found no statewide adult justice referral to a qualifying restorative process. Located restorative provisions were school- or youth-focused or generic mediation.", "confidence": "Medium-high — direct statewide authority/program review under the revised LA3 rule.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0639", "src-0640" ] }, { "stateCode": "NV", "stateName": "Nevada", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA4", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Nevada does not guarantee dismissal, nonfiling, sealing, or expungement after successful completion of a school RJ plan. Disciplinary reductions remain discretionary and are not completion-triggered. LA4 is 0.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0634" ] }, { "stateCode": "NV", "stateName": "Nevada", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Existing state education administration has an explicit restorative implementation role.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0637", "src-0638" ] }, { "stateCode": "NV", "stateName": "Nevada", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "No formal public state–local body substantively dedicated to youth restorative justice was located.", "confidence": "Medium — District planning requirements create collaboration but not a single qualifying body.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0641", "src-0642", "src-0643" ] }, { "stateCode": "NV", "stateName": "Nevada", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "State grants, training, and implementation infrastructure substantially support restorative practice.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0637", "src-0638" ] }, { "stateCode": "NV", "stateName": "Nevada", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "4", "scoreNumeric": 4, "reasoning": "Recurring grant/program reporting includes formal evaluation and corrective recommendations.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0637", "src-0638" ] }, { "stateCode": "NV", "stateName": "Nevada", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F1", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Nevada's identified restorative-practices funding was federal ESSER support for school discipline and does not qualify as state-origin youth-justice funding. The completed current state budget, juvenile-justice grant, procurement, and award search found no state-origin award or operating allocation for a qualifying youth restorative diversion or alternative program.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0644", "src-0645" ] }, { "stateCode": "NV", "stateName": "Nevada", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Revised F1 is Verified absence / 0 after the completed state-origin funding search. Under the live dependency rule, F2 is Structural N/A / X; excluded federal, school-only, local-only, generic-diversion, proposed, or out-of-period funding is not reused.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0644", "src-0645" ] }, { "stateCode": "NV", "stateName": "Nevada", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F3", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Revised F1 is Verified absence / 0 after the completed state-origin funding search. Under the live dependency rule, F3 is Structural N/A / X; excluded federal, school-only, local-only, generic-diversion, proposed, or out-of-period funding is not reused.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0644", "src-0645" ] }, { "stateCode": "NV", "stateName": "Nevada", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "$2.00", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "FY2025 Title II allocation $653,877 ÷ 326,527 eligible residents ages 10–17 (statutory minimum age 10) = $2.00 per eligible youth. Full precision is retained for scoring.", "confidence": "High — official FY2025 allocation table, verified jurisdiction ages, and 2024 Census single-year-age estimates.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0016", "src-0646", "src-0647" ] }, { "stateCode": "NV", "stateName": "Nevada", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "6%", "scoreNumeric": 0.06, "reasoning": "1 / 17 = 5.88%", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0648", "src-0649", "src-0650" ] }, { "stateCode": "NV", "stateName": "Nevada", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "75%", "scoreNumeric": 0.75, "reasoning": "Eligible-age population in verified R1 operating-location counties is 243,922 of 326,527 statewide residents ages 10–17, or 74.70%. Provider locations counted: Clark County. Claimed service areas were not substituted for physical operating locations.", "confidence": "High for the population calculation; provider-location completeness inherits the R1 evidence limits and is a conservative verified floor.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0648", "src-0649", "src-0650", "src-0651", "src-0652" ] }, { "stateCode": "NV", "stateName": "Nevada", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "One peer/youth-court restorative approach is verified.", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0648", "src-0649", "src-0650" ] }, { "stateCode": "NV", "stateName": "Nevada", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "The current Youth Court Restorative Program accepts school-administration referrals for first-offense cases as an alternative to conventional juvenile processing.", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0648", "src-0649", "src-0650" ] }, { "stateCode": "NH", "stateName": "New Hampshire", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "New Hampshire defines every court-approved juvenile diversion program as a community-based alternative integrating restorative justice practices. LB1 is 1.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0653" ] }, { "stateCode": "NH", "stateName": "New Hampshire", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "The RJ recognition sits within the dedicated delinquent-children chapter and is connected to detailed statewide diversion referral and stay procedures. The significant youth focus earns 2.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0653", "src-0654" ] }, { "stateCode": "NH", "stateName": "New Hampshire", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "The juvenile diversion and RJ-integration provisions are permanent codified law with no pilot term or sunset. New Hampshire earns 2.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0653", "src-0654" ] }, { "stateCode": "NH", "stateName": "New Hampshire", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Before filing, the arresting agency or prosecutor must review the needs-assessment recommendations to screen for diversion, and the petitioner must identify why diversion was inappropriate. Because court-approved diversion integrates RJ by definition, this is required consideration but not a required offer.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0655", "src-0656" ] }, { "stateCode": "NH", "stateName": "New Hampshire", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "4", "scoreNumeric": 4, "reasoning": "State law authorizes referral procedures for all juvenile matters and uses individualized best-interest and consent criteria without a broad offense exclusion.", "confidence": "High for Legal/GA1/GA3; Medium for GA4", "sourceIds": [ "src-0657", "src-0658", "src-0659" ] }, { "stateCode": "NH", "stateName": "New Hampshire", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "4", "scoreNumeric": 4, "reasoning": "The affirmative all-juvenile-matters rule contains no statewide prior-record exclusion.", "confidence": "High for Legal/GA1/GA3; Medium for GA4", "sourceIds": [ "src-0657", "src-0658", "src-0659" ] }, { "stateCode": "NH", "stateName": "New Hampshire", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "RSA 21-H:4 requires the Department of Corrections to operate a victim-initiated, voluntary victim-offender dialogue program; RSA 21-M:8-k gives victims a right of access to restorative justice programs offered through DOC.", "confidence": "High — direct statewide authority/program review under the revised LA3 rule.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0660", "src-0661" ] }, { "stateCode": "NH", "stateName": "New Hampshire", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA4", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "The statute defines diversion as official action not taken or postponed and stays filed proceedings during referral, but it does not require nonfiling, dismissal, sealing, or expungement upon successful RJ completion. LA4 is 0.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0653", "src-0654" ] }, { "stateCode": "NH", "stateName": "New Hampshire", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Existing statewide court/diversion administration has an explicit restorative role.", "confidence": "High for Legal/GA1/GA3; Medium for GA4", "sourceIds": [ "src-0657", "src-0658", "src-0659" ] }, { "stateCode": "NH", "stateName": "New Hampshire", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "No current formal public state–local body substantively dedicated to youth restorative justice was located.", "confidence": "Medium — A temporary legislative study committee expired after completing its report.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0662", "src-0663", "src-0664" ] }, { "stateCode": "NH", "stateName": "New Hampshire", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "Accreditation, common standards, training, and statewide diversion infrastructure provide substantial implementation support.", "confidence": "High for Legal/GA1/GA3; Medium for GA4", "sourceIds": [ "src-0657", "src-0658", "src-0659" ] }, { "stateCode": "NH", "stateName": "New Hampshire", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Common reporting monitors the broader accredited diversion system, but public restorative activity is not separately detailed.", "confidence": "High for Legal/GA1/GA3; Medium for GA4", "sourceIds": [ "src-0657", "src-0658", "src-0659" ] }, { "stateCode": "NH", "stateName": "New Hampshire", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "The Executive Council approved an $800,000 amendment funded 100% from the state General Fund through June 30, 2026 for the statewide juvenile-diversion network. Current RSA 169-B:2 defines every approved juvenile diversion program as integrating restorative justice. The allocation is therefore dedicated primarily to a qualifying restorative youth-diversion mechanism, supporting tier 3.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0665", "src-0666", "src-0659" ] }, { "stateCode": "NH", "stateName": "New Hampshire", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "The current General-Fund-supported juvenile-diversion network continues a recurring state contract mechanism with prior contracts, amendments, and renewal history. The current accredited program network covers all ten counties. F2 and F3 are both 3.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0665", "src-0666", "src-0659" ] }, { "stateCode": "NH", "stateName": "New Hampshire", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "The current General-Fund-supported juvenile-diversion network continues a recurring state contract mechanism with prior contracts, amendments, and renewal history. The current accredited program network covers all ten counties. F2 and F3 are both 3.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0665", "src-0666", "src-0659" ] }, { "stateCode": "NH", "stateName": "New Hampshire", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "$7.89", "scoreNumeric": 7.89, "reasoning": "FY2025 Title II allocation $613,338 ÷ 77,737 eligible residents ages 13–17 (statutory minimum age 13) = $7.89 per eligible youth. Full precision is retained for scoring.", "confidence": "High — official FY2025 allocation table, verified jurisdiction ages, and 2024 Census single-year-age estimates.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0016", "src-0667", "src-0668" ] }, { "stateCode": "NH", "stateName": "New Hampshire", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "70%", "scoreNumeric": 0.7, "reasoning": "7 / 10 = 70.00%", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0669", "src-0670", "src-0671", "src-0672" ] }, { "stateCode": "NH", "stateName": "New Hampshire", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "91%", "scoreNumeric": 0.91, "reasoning": "Eligible-age population in verified R1 operating-location counties is 71,087 of 77,737 statewide residents ages 13–17, or 91.45%. Provider locations counted: Belknap County, Cheshire County, Grafton County, Hillsborough County, Merrimack County, Rockingham County, Strafford County. Claimed service areas were not substituted for physical operating locations.", "confidence": "High for the population calculation; provider-location completeness inherits the R1 evidence limits and is a conservative verified floor.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0669", "src-0670", "src-0671", "src-0672", "src-0673", "src-0674" ] }, { "stateCode": "NH", "stateName": "New Hampshire", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "The completed accredited-program directory establishes one recurring community-accountability/court-diversion approach family across the verified locations; additional distinct functional approaches were not independently verified.", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0669", "src-0670", "src-0671", "src-0672" ] }, { "stateCode": "NH", "stateName": "New Hampshire", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R4", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "A completed state and county school-route search found no operational qualifying school-discipline or school-offense diversion pathway.", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0669", "src-0670", "src-0671", "src-0672" ] }, { "stateCode": "NJ", "stateName": "New Jersey", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "New Jersey established a youth-focused restorative and transformative justice pilot with restorative justice hubs providing peace circles, community conferencing, diversion, and reentry services. LB1 is 1.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0675", "src-0676" ] }, { "stateCode": "NJ", "stateName": "New Jersey", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "The entire act is dedicated to youth diversion, reentry, restorative hubs, service coordination, training, grants, and evaluation. The significant youth focus earns 2.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0675" ] }, { "stateCode": "NJ", "stateName": "New Jersey", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "The act establishes a two-year pilot and expires after the commission's report rather than creating a permanent program. Current official materials still identify operative implementation rules, so the temporary authority earns 1.", "confidence": "Medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0675", "src-0676" ] }, { "stateCode": "NJ", "stateName": "New Jersey", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "The act establishes and funds restorative hubs but imposes no case-level duty on a prosecutor, court, school, or other decision-maker to consider or offer RJ to an eligible youth. LB4 is 0.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0675" ] }, { "stateCode": "NJ", "stateName": "New Jersey", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "P.L.2021, c.196 assigns program design and service-provider selection to county youth services commissions and local hubs without a statewide offense floor.", "confidence": "High for delegation and administration; Medium-High for continuing reporting", "sourceIds": [ "src-0677", "src-0678", "src-0679" ] }, { "stateCode": "NJ", "stateName": "New Jersey", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Local hub/provider design controls prior-contact eligibility; the state statute supplies no statewide floor.", "confidence": "High for delegation and administration; Medium-High for continuing reporting", "sourceIds": [ "src-0677", "src-0678", "src-0679" ] }, { "stateCode": "NJ", "stateName": "New Jersey", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "P.L.2021, c.60 directs the Attorney General to establish a statewide Sexual Violence Restorative Justice Pilot Program. Participation is voluntary, the definition requires those harmed and responsible to address the act and its aftermath, and the law has no age ceiling excluding 18–25. Implementation has been slower than the statute contemplated, so confidence is not rated high.", "confidence": "Medium — direct statewide authority/program review under the revised LA3 rule.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0680", "src-0681" ] }, { "stateCode": "NJ", "stateName": "New Jersey", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA4", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "The hub statute guarantees no nonfiling, dismissal, sealing, or expungement upon successful RJ completion. LA4 is 0.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0675" ] }, { "stateCode": "NJ", "stateName": "New Jersey", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "The Juvenile Justice Commission operates a dedicated restorative/transformative youth pilot structure.", "confidence": "High for delegation and administration; Medium-High for continuing reporting", "sourceIds": [ "src-0677", "src-0678", "src-0679" ] }, { "stateCode": "NJ", "stateName": "New Jersey", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "The formal pilot links the JJC, counties, four municipal hubs, and community providers across Camden, Newark, Paterson, and Trenton.", "confidence": "High — Public meeting records are less complete than program-operation records.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0682", "src-0683", "src-0684" ] }, { "stateCode": "NJ", "stateName": "New Jersey", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "State rules, grants, provider requirements, and hub infrastructure provide substantial implementation support.", "confidence": "High for delegation and administration; Medium-High for continuing reporting", "sourceIds": [ "src-0677", "src-0678", "src-0679" ] }, { "stateCode": "NJ", "stateName": "New Jersey", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "Public state budget and program reporting provide municipality/provider participation and outcome detail.", "confidence": "High for delegation and administration; Medium-High for continuing reporting", "sourceIds": [ "src-0677", "src-0678", "src-0679" ] }, { "stateCode": "NJ", "stateName": "New Jersey", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "New Jersey's Restorative and Transformative Justice for Youths and Communities Pilot is a dedicated youth restorative-diversion and reentry mechanism. The hubs opened in Camden, Newark, Paterson, and Trenton in 2024, and the state budget identifies a continuing dedicated program line of $1.1 million for FY2026. Because the operating allocation is primarily for the qualifying youth restorative program, tier 3 applies.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0685", "src-0686", "src-0687" ] }, { "stateCode": "NJ", "stateName": "New Jersey", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "The dedicated Restorative and Transformative Justice for Youths and Communities mechanism is a time-limited pilot, supporting F2=1. Operating hubs in Camden, Newark, Paterson, and Trenton establish multiple funded local units but not nearly all county-equivalents, supporting F3=2.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0685", "src-0686", "src-0687" ] }, { "stateCode": "NJ", "stateName": "New Jersey", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "The dedicated Restorative and Transformative Justice for Youths and Communities mechanism is a time-limited pilot, supporting F2=1. Operating hubs in Camden, Newark, Paterson, and Trenton establish multiple funded local units but not nearly all county-equivalents, supporting F3=2.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0685", "src-0686", "src-0687" ] }, { "stateCode": "NJ", "stateName": "New Jersey", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "$1.22", "scoreNumeric": 1.22, "reasoning": "FY2025 Title II allocation $1,156,410 ÷ 949,849 eligible residents ages 10–17 (age 10 fallback because no general statutory minimum was identified) = $1.22 per eligible youth. Full precision is retained for scoring.", "confidence": "High — official FY2025 allocation table, verified jurisdiction ages, and 2024 Census single-year-age estimates.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0016", "src-0688", "src-0689" ] }, { "stateCode": "NJ", "stateName": "New Jersey", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "29%", "scoreNumeric": 0.29, "reasoning": "6 / 21 = 28.57%", "confidence": "medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0690", "src-0691", "src-0692", "src-0693", "src-0694" ] }, { "stateCode": "NJ", "stateName": "New Jersey", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "39%", "scoreNumeric": 0.39, "reasoning": "Eligible-age population in verified R1 operating-location counties is 369,127 of 949,849 statewide residents ages 10–17, or 38.86%. Provider locations counted: Camden County, Essex County, Hudson County, Mercer County, Passaic County, Union County. Claimed service areas were not substituted for physical operating locations.", "confidence": "High for the population calculation; provider-location completeness inherits the R1 evidence limits and is a conservative verified floor.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0690", "src-0691", "src-0692", "src-0693", "src-0694", "src-0695", "src-0696" ] }, { "stateCode": "NJ", "stateName": "New Jersey", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Current hub and school records independently establish restorative hub/conferencing work and school circles/repair processes across multiple providers and municipalities.", "confidence": "medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0690", "src-0691", "src-0692", "src-0693", "src-0694" ] }, { "stateCode": "NJ", "stateName": "New Jersey", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "Current pilot rules expressly allow school administrators to refer youth to restorative hubs in lieu of suspension, expulsion, or law-enforcement referral.", "confidence": "medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0690", "src-0691", "src-0692", "src-0693", "src-0694" ] }, { "stateCode": "NM", "stateName": "New Mexico", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB1", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "The completed current-law search found no enacted, operative statewide New Mexico law expressly recognizing a youth RJ mechanism. Proposed bills, memorials, agency models, and local practices do not satisfy the legal-authority gateway, so LB1 is 0.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0697", "src-0698" ] }, { "stateCode": "NM", "stateName": "New Mexico", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "New Mexico's completed current enacted-law search found no qualifying youth-specific restorative-justice recognition. LB2's live scale has no X outcome, so the correct classification is Verified absence/0. Because LB2=0, LB3, LB4, and LA1-LA4 remain Structural N/A/X under the live gateway.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0697" ] }, { "stateCode": "NM", "stateName": "New Mexico", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB3", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "New Mexico's LB1 gateway is 0, so duration cannot be assessed for a nonexistent statewide youth-RJ authority. LB3 is Structural N/A/X.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0697" ] }, { "stateCode": "NM", "stateName": "New Mexico", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB4", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "New Mexico's LB1 gateway is 0, so referral-directive strength for a statewide youth-RJ mechanism cannot be evaluated. LB4 is Structural N/A/X.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0697" ] }, { "stateCode": "NM", "stateName": "New Mexico", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA1", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "The live LB2 gateway is not satisfied.", "confidence": "High for GA1/GA3; Medium-High for GA4 recurrence", "sourceIds": [ "src-0699", "src-0700" ] }, { "stateCode": "NM", "stateName": "New Mexico", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA2", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "The live LB2 gateway is not satisfied.", "confidence": "High for GA1/GA3; Medium-High for GA4 recurrence", "sourceIds": [ "src-0699", "src-0700" ] }, { "stateCode": "NM", "stateName": "New Mexico", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA3", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "A completed current search found historical agency plans to expand prison restorative panels and dialogue, but no current statute, binding rule, or operating state-administered adult referral pathway. Historical plans are not controlling current evidence.", "confidence": "Medium-high — direct statewide authority/program review under the revised LA3 rule.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0701", "src-0702" ] }, { "stateCode": "NM", "stateName": "New Mexico", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA4", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "New Mexico has no qualifying statewide youth-RJ pathway to which a completion benefit could attach. LA4 is Structural N/A/X.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0697" ] }, { "stateCode": "NM", "stateName": "New Mexico", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "CYFD administers Continuum grants whose stated priorities include diversion and restorative justice.", "confidence": "High for GA1/GA3; Medium-High for GA4 recurrence", "sourceIds": [ "src-0699", "src-0700" ] }, { "stateCode": "NM", "stateName": "New Mexico", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "No formal public state–local body substantively dedicated to youth restorative justice was located.", "confidence": "Medium — School implementation teams do not constitute a statewide public coordination body.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0703", "src-0704", "src-0705" ] }, { "stateCode": "NM", "stateName": "New Mexico", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "CYFD and NMPED publish multiple current implementation resources and program-design support.", "confidence": "High for GA1/GA3; Medium-High for GA4 recurrence", "sourceIds": [ "src-0699", "src-0700" ] }, { "stateCode": "NM", "stateName": "New Mexico", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "The recurring Youth Services and Delinquency Prevention annual reporting series itemizes county awards and identifies restorative-justice programs at the jurisdiction level.", "confidence": "High for GA1/GA3; Medium-High for GA4 recurrence", "sourceIds": [ "src-0699", "src-0700" ] }, { "stateCode": "NM", "stateName": "New Mexico", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "The latest completed official Juvenile Continuum reporting itemizes awards to specifically named restorative-justice projects, including youth-focused local continuum work. The larger continuum mechanism funds multiple juvenile-justice priorities, so only the separately identified restorative awards qualify; that supports tier 2 rather than treating the entire continuum appropriation as restorative funding.", "confidence": "Medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0706" ] }, { "stateCode": "NM", "stateName": "New Mexico", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F2", "status": "unknown", "statusLabel": "Unknown", "scoreDisplay": "M", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "The latest completed Juvenile Continuum report itemizes qualifying restorative projects in multiple local jurisdictions, supporting F3=2. The reviewed record does not establish that those qualifying projects were renewed more than once or operate under a dedicated recurring state RJ grant program, so F2 remains M.", "confidence": "Medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0706" ] }, { "stateCode": "NM", "stateName": "New Mexico", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "The latest completed Juvenile Continuum report itemizes qualifying restorative projects in multiple local jurisdictions, supporting F3=2. The reviewed record does not establish that those qualifying projects were renewed more than once or operate under a dedicated recurring state RJ grant program, so F2 remains M.", "confidence": "Medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0706" ] }, { "stateCode": "NM", "stateName": "New Mexico", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "$2.93", "scoreNumeric": 2.93, "reasoning": "FY2025 Title II allocation $643,204 ÷ 219,268 eligible residents ages 10–17 (age 10 fallback because no general statutory minimum was identified) = $2.93 per eligible youth. Full precision is retained for scoring.", "confidence": "High — official FY2025 allocation table, verified jurisdiction ages, and 2024 Census single-year-age estimates.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0016", "src-0707", "src-0708" ] }, { "stateCode": "NM", "stateName": "New Mexico", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "33%", "scoreNumeric": 0.33, "reasoning": "11 / 33 = 33.33%", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0709", "src-0710", "src-0711", "src-0712" ] }, { "stateCode": "NM", "stateName": "New Mexico", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "70%", "scoreNumeric": 0.7, "reasoning": "Eligible-age population in verified R1 operating-location counties is 154,004 of 219,268 statewide residents ages 10–17, or 70.24%. Provider locations counted: Bernalillo County, Chaves County, Curry County, Doña Ana County, Lincoln County, Los Alamos County, Sandoval County, San Juan County, San Miguel County, Santa Fe County, Taos County. Claimed service areas were not substituted for physical operating locations.", "confidence": "High for the population calculation; provider-location completeness inherits the R1 evidence limits and is a conservative verified floor.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0709", "src-0710", "src-0711", "src-0712", "src-0713", "src-0714" ] }, { "stateCode": "NM", "stateName": "New Mexico", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "The current PED cohort and Santa Fe Uplift materials establish circles and repairing-harm/accountability processes across multiple schools and a separate county diversion provider.", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0709", "src-0710", "src-0711", "src-0712" ] }, { "stateCode": "NM", "stateName": "New Mexico", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Current school cohorts use substantive tiered restorative response processes, but the evidence does not establish a formal replacement pathway for school discipline or police/court referral.", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0709", "src-0710", "src-0711", "src-0712" ] }, { "stateCode": "NY", "stateName": "New York", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB1", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "The completed current-law search found no enacted, operative statewide New York law expressly recognizing a youth restorative-justice mechanism. Current Family Court diversion is generic, while express school-restorative language remains in pending legislation. LB1 is 0.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0715", "src-0716" ] }, { "stateCode": "NY", "stateName": "New York", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "New York's completed current enacted-law search found no qualifying youth-specific restorative-justice recognition. LB2's live scale has no X outcome, so the correct classification is Verified absence/0. Because LB2=0, LB3, LB4, and LA1-LA4 remain Structural N/A/X under the live gateway.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0715" ] }, { "stateCode": "NY", "stateName": "New York", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB3", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "New York's LB1 gateway is 0, so duration cannot be assessed for a nonexistent statewide youth-RJ authority. LB3 is Structural N/A/X.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0715" ] }, { "stateCode": "NY", "stateName": "New York", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB4", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "New York's LB1 gateway is 0, so referral-directive strength for a statewide youth-RJ mechanism cannot be evaluated. LB4 is Structural N/A/X.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0715" ] }, { "stateCode": "NY", "stateName": "New York", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA1", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "The live LB2 gateway is not satisfied.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0717", "src-0718" ] }, { "stateCode": "NY", "stateName": "New York", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA2", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "The live LB2 gateway is not satisfied.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0717", "src-0718" ] }, { "stateCode": "NY", "stateName": "New York", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "New York DOCCS currently operates a statewide victim-initiated Victim-Offender Dialogue program for incarcerated adults, focused on the crime’s impact, accountability, and healing.", "confidence": "High — direct statewide authority/program review under the revised LA3 rule.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0719", "src-0720" ] }, { "stateCode": "NY", "stateName": "New York", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA4", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "New York has no qualifying statewide youth-RJ pathway to which a completion benefit could attach. LA4 is Structural N/A/X.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0715" ] }, { "stateCode": "NY", "stateName": "New York", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "The Unified Court System administers a statewide dispute-resolution network with an identifiable youth restorative component.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0717", "src-0718" ] }, { "stateCode": "NY", "stateName": "New York", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "Nine Regional Youth Justice Teams meet quarterly and include local government, providers, courts, community organizations, youth, and families.", "confidence": "High — Team priorities vary by region, but restorative practice is a documented substantive work area.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0721", "src-0722", "src-0723" ] }, { "stateCode": "NY", "stateName": "New York", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "The court system provides statewide training, grants, standards, and implementation infrastructure.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0717", "src-0718" ] }, { "stateCode": "NY", "stateName": "New York", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "Recurring public CDRC grant/program reporting provides provider and jurisdiction-level activity detail.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0717", "src-0718" ] }, { "stateCode": "NY", "stateName": "New York", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "The Unified Court System maintains ongoing state-funded contracts with Community Dispute Resolution Centers across New York. Current program materials identify youth-offense restorative-justice services within that network, but the contracts support broad mediation and dispute-resolution portfolios. The identifiable youth-restorative component is therefore inseparable from broader operating support, which fits tier 1.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0724", "src-0725", "src-0726" ] }, { "stateCode": "NY", "stateName": "New York", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "The Unified Court System's Community Dispute Resolution Center contracts are a dedicated recurring state funding mechanism. The funded network operates in every New York county and includes current youth-offense restorative services. F2 and F3 are both 3.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0724", "src-0725", "src-0726" ] }, { "stateCode": "NY", "stateName": "New York", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "The Unified Court System's Community Dispute Resolution Center contracts are a dedicated recurring state funding mechanism. The funded network operates in every New York county and includes current youth-offense restorative services. F2 and F3 are both 3.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0724", "src-0725", "src-0726" ] }, { "stateCode": "NY", "stateName": "New York", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "$1.28", "scoreNumeric": 1.28, "reasoning": "FY2025 Title II allocation $1,772,916 ÷ 1,385,786 eligible residents ages 12–17 (statutory minimum age 12) = $1.28 per eligible youth. Full precision is retained for scoring.", "confidence": "High — official FY2025 allocation table, verified jurisdiction ages, and 2024 Census single-year-age estimates.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0016", "src-0727", "src-0728" ] }, { "stateCode": "NY", "stateName": "New York", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "45%", "scoreNumeric": 0.45, "reasoning": "28 / 62 = 45.16%", "confidence": "medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0729", "src-0730", "src-0731", "src-0732", "src-0733", "src-0734", "src-0735", "src-0736", "src-0737", "src-0738", "src-0739", "src-0740", "src-0741", "src-0742", "src-0743", "src-0744", "src-0745", "src-0746" ] }, { "stateCode": "NY", "stateName": "New York", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "78%", "scoreNumeric": 0.78, "reasoning": "Eligible-age population in verified R1 operating-location counties is 1,077,176 of 1,385,786 statewide residents ages 12–17, or 77.73%. Provider locations counted: Albany County, Cayuga County, Chautauqua County, Clinton County, Dutchess County, Erie County, Greene County, Jefferson County, Kings County, Lewis County, Livingston County, Monroe County, Nassau County, New York County, Oneida County, Onondaga County, Ontario County, Queens County, Richmond County, Rockland County, Saratoga County, Schenectady County, St. Lawrence County, Steuben County, Yates County, Wayne County, Suffolk County, Westchester County. Claimed service areas were not substituted for physical operating locations.", "confidence": "High for the population calculation; provider-location completeness inherits the R1 evidence limits and is a conservative verified floor.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0729", "src-0730", "src-0731", "src-0732", "src-0733", "src-0734", "src-0735", "src-0736", "src-0737", "src-0738", "src-0739", "src-0740", "src-0741", "src-0742", "src-0743", "src-0744", "src-0745", "src-0746", "src-0747", "src-0748" ] }, { "stateCode": "NY", "stateName": "New York", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "Current court materials identify youth restorative programming, parent-child mediation, school peer mediation, restorative implementation, and multiple dialogue methods across the statewide center network.", "confidence": "medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0729", "src-0730", "src-0731", "src-0732", "src-0733", "src-0734", "src-0735", "src-0736", "src-0737", "src-0738", "src-0739", "src-0740", "src-0741", "src-0742", "src-0743", "src-0744", "src-0745", "src-0746" ] }, { "stateCode": "NY", "stateName": "New York", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Current CDRCs provide school-based restorative implementation and peer mediation that address discipline and reduce punitive responses; no formal individual school-diversion replacement route was verified.", "confidence": "medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0729", "src-0730", "src-0731", "src-0732", "src-0733", "src-0734", "src-0735", "src-0736", "src-0737", "src-0738", "src-0739", "src-0740", "src-0741", "src-0742", "src-0743", "src-0744", "src-0745", "src-0746" ] }, { "stateCode": "NC", "stateName": "North Carolina", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "North Carolina expressly authorizes victim-offender mediation in juvenile diversion contracts and victim-offender reconciliation after delinquency adjudication. These are qualifying restorative processes, so LB1 is 1.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0749", "src-0750" ] }, { "stateCode": "NC", "stateName": "North Carolina", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "The qualifying provisions sit in the dedicated juvenile code but mention the restorative processes only briefly among broader diversion and disposition alternatives. The brief youth focus earns 1.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0749", "src-0750" ] }, { "stateCode": "NC", "stateName": "North Carolina", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "The victim-offender mediation and reconciliation authorities are permanent codified law with no pilot term or sunset. North Carolina earns 2.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0749", "src-0750" ] }, { "stateCode": "NC", "stateName": "North Carolina", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "A juvenile court counselor may divert a complaint and a court may select victim-offender reconciliation, but no decision-maker must consider, prefer, or offer the restorative option. LB4 is 0.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0749", "src-0750" ] }, { "stateCode": "NC", "stateName": "North Carolina", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "Victim-offender reconciliation remains available for selected serious and violent cases at disposition Levels 1 and 2, while mandatory Level 3 and listed nondivertible cases are excluded.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0751", "src-0752", "src-0753" ] }, { "stateCode": "NC", "stateName": "North Carolina", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "Only specified serious delinquency-history combinations automatically remove access; ordinary prior contact does not.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0751", "src-0752", "src-0753" ] }, { "stateCode": "NC", "stateName": "North Carolina", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA3", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Although NCDAC announced a VOD rollout in 2024, the current Victim Support Services page explicitly says the department does not currently have a VOD program. No other statewide adult qualifying pathway was located, so the current controlling evidence supports 0 rather than M.", "confidence": "High — direct statewide authority/program review under the revised LA3 rule.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0754", "src-0755" ] }, { "stateCode": "NC", "stateName": "North Carolina", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "When victim-offender mediation is included in a diversion contract and the juvenile successfully completes the contract, the counselor must retain the complaint and cannot file it as a petition. This guaranteed nonfiling benefit earns 2.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0749" ] }, { "stateCode": "NC", "stateName": "North Carolina", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "DPS has a formal state restorative-justice function/specialist within youth administration.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0751", "src-0752", "src-0753" ] }, { "stateCode": "NC", "stateName": "North Carolina", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "No formal public state–local body substantively dedicated to youth restorative justice was located.", "confidence": "Medium — Teen-court partnerships and facility teams do not constitute a statewide governance body.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0756", "src-0757", "src-0758" ] }, { "stateCode": "NC", "stateName": "North Carolina", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "State training, specialist support, directories, and statewide program infrastructure are substantial.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0751", "src-0752", "src-0753" ] }, { "stateCode": "NC", "stateName": "North Carolina", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "Recurring reports publish program/jurisdiction-level training, participation, and implementation detail.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0751", "src-0752", "src-0753" ] }, { "stateCode": "NC", "stateName": "North Carolina", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "North Carolina's state-administered Juvenile Crime Prevention Council system identifies funded county programs with qualifying restorative components, including youth court, accountability, restitution, and community-repair processes. These are separately identified funded programs within a broader juvenile-services mechanism; the state-origin restorative share is not a single statewide appropriation. Tier 2 applies.", "confidence": "Medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0759", "src-0760", "src-0761" ] }, { "stateCode": "NC", "stateName": "North Carolina", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "The annual state-administered JCPC funding mechanism recurs and currently supports identifiable qualifying youth restorative programs. Current state records identify qualifying funded programs in multiple counties, but no reproducible qualifying roster approaches the 80% threshold. F2=3 and F3=2.", "confidence": "Medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0759", "src-0760", "src-0761" ] }, { "stateCode": "NC", "stateName": "North Carolina", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "The annual state-administered JCPC funding mechanism recurs and currently supports identifiable qualifying youth restorative programs. Current state records identify qualifying funded programs in multiple counties, but no reproducible qualifying roster approaches the 80% threshold. F2=3 and F3=2.", "confidence": "Medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0759", "src-0760", "src-0761" ] }, { "stateCode": "NC", "stateName": "North Carolina", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "$1.22", "scoreNumeric": 1.22, "reasoning": "FY2025 Title II allocation $1,336,601 ÷ 1,096,364 eligible residents ages 10–17 (statutory minimum age 10) = $1.22 per eligible youth. Full precision is retained for scoring.", "confidence": "High — official FY2025 allocation table, verified jurisdiction ages, and 2024 Census single-year-age estimates.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0016", "src-0762", "src-0763" ] }, { "stateCode": "NC", "stateName": "North Carolina", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "75%", "scoreNumeric": 0.75, "reasoning": "75 / 100 = 75.00%", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0764", "src-0765", "src-0766" ] }, { "stateCode": "NC", "stateName": "North Carolina", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "79%", "scoreNumeric": 0.79, "reasoning": "Eligible-age population in verified R1 operating-location counties is 868,355 of 1,096,364 statewide residents ages 10–17, or 79.20%. Provider locations counted: Alamance County, Alexander County, Alleghany County, Ashe County, Avery County, Beaufort County, Bertie County, Bladen County, Brunswick County, Buncombe County, Burke County, Cabarrus County, Camden County, Carteret County, Caswell County, Cherokee County, Chowan County, Cleveland County, Columbus County, Craven County, Cumberland County, Currituck County, Dare County, Davidson County, Duplin County, Durham County, Edgecombe County, Forsyth County, Franklin County, Gaston County, Granville County, Greene County, Guilford County, Harnett County, Haywood County, Henderson County, Hoke County, Iredell County, Jackson County, Johnston County, Jones County, Lenoir County, Martin County, Mitchell County, Montgomery County, Moore County, Nash County, New Hanover County, Orange County, Pasquotank County, Pender County, Perquimans County, Person County, Pitt County, Randolph County, Richmond County, Robeson County, Rockingham County, Rowan County, Sampson County, Scotland County, Stanly County, Stokes County, Surry County, Union County, Vance County, Wake County, Warren County, Washington County, Watauga County, Wayne County, Wilkes County, Wilson County, Yadkin County, Yancey County. Claimed service areas were not substituted for physical operating locations.", "confidence": "High for the population calculation; provider-location completeness inherits the R1 evidence limits and is a conservative verified floor.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0764", "src-0765", "src-0766", "src-0767", "src-0768" ] }, { "stateCode": "NC", "stateName": "North Carolina", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "The live DPS directory independently verifies peer/teen courts, victim-offender mediation, impact/sentencing circles, and restorative family conferencing across many providers and jurisdictions.", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0764", "src-0765", "src-0766" ] }, { "stateCode": "NC", "stateName": "North Carolina", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "Current directory records expressly identify school-administrator and SRO referrals, alternatives to disciplinary practices, and school restorative pathways that replace suspension or court processing.", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0764", "src-0765", "src-0766" ] }, { "stateCode": "ND", "stateName": "North Dakota", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "North Dakota Century Code § 27-20.2-01(21) expressly defines restorative justice in the Juvenile Court Act as rehabilitation through reconciliation with victims and the community. The current enacted statewide recognition satisfies LB1.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0769" ] }, { "stateCode": "ND", "stateName": "North Dakota", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "The qualifying recognition is expressly youth-specific because it appears in the Juvenile Court Act and governs children in juvenile proceedings. It is nevertheless a brief definition within a broader juvenile-law framework rather than a detailed dedicated youth-RJ law, so the general youth-recognition tier of 1 applies.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0770", "src-0771" ] }, { "stateCode": "ND", "stateName": "North Dakota", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "The youth-RJ definition is permanent codified law, and the statewide juvenile-procedure rule authorizing offender accountability conferencing is current with no pilot term, sunset, or expiration. The permanent-authority tier applies.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0772", "src-0773" ] }, { "stateCode": "ND", "stateName": "North Dakota", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Current Rule 18 permits a petitioned or nonpetitioned juvenile case to be referred to offender accountability conferencing, but uses discretionary language: a case 'may be referred.' No law requires consideration of, preference for, or an offer of restorative conferencing. Referral is entirely discretionary, so LB4 is 0.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0774", "src-0775" ] }, { "stateCode": "ND", "stateName": "North Dakota", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "The broad statewide juvenile pathway reaches petitioned and nonpetitioned cases, and § 27-20.4-11(2)(d) expressly permits informal adjustment of a sex-offense referral that could require registration when the state's attorney and victim agree. Because a serious offense category is affirmatively eligible rather than merely not excluded, LA1 is 3.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0776", "src-0777" ] }, { "stateCode": "ND", "stateName": "North Dakota", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "4", "scoreNumeric": 4, "reasoning": "Sections 27-20.4-10 and 27-20.4-11 use alternative eligibility criteria. Prior diversion or adjudication history is considered, but it is not an absolute statewide bar: a youth can qualify through other statutory prongs, including a prosecutor-requested or court-ordered informal adjustment, an agreed sex-offense adjustment, or a Division referral. Eligibility therefore remains individualized with no statewide prior-record exclusion.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0778", "src-0777" ] }, { "stateCode": "ND", "stateName": "North Dakota", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "N.D.C.C. Chapter 12.1-32 authorizes completion of a restorative justice program as a sentencing alternative for any person convicted and defines the process through reconciliation with victims and the community; it is not youth-limited.", "confidence": "High — direct statewide authority/program review under the revised LA3 rule.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0779" ] }, { "stateCode": "ND", "stateName": "North Dakota", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA4", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "The completed current-law search found no statute or binding statewide rule that expressly guarantees dismissal, nonfiling, sealing, or expungement upon successful completion of offender accountability conferencing. Conferencing can occur in petitioned as well as nonpetitioned cases, and the generic diversion phrase 'in lieu of further proceedings' is not an RJ-completion guarantee. LA4 is 0.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0780", "src-0781", "src-0782" ] }, { "stateCode": "ND", "stateName": "North Dakota", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "State juvenile courts contract for offender-accountability conferencing and other juvenile restorative services.", "confidence": "Medium-High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0783", "src-0784", "src-0785" ] }, { "stateCode": "ND", "stateName": "North Dakota", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "No formal public state–local body substantively dedicated to youth restorative justice was located.", "confidence": "Medium — A provider-led advisory group is not a public state–local body.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0786", "src-0787", "src-0788" ] }, { "stateCode": "ND", "stateName": "North Dakota", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Court rules and public program pages provide basic implementation references.", "confidence": "Medium-High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0783", "src-0784", "src-0785" ] }, { "stateCode": "ND", "stateName": "North Dakota", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Annual juvenile-court reports monitor the broader state system containing contracted offender-accountability conferencing, but restorative referrals/outcomes are not separately published.", "confidence": "Medium-High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0783", "src-0784", "src-0785" ] }, { "stateCode": "ND", "stateName": "North Dakota", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "The North Dakota Court System expressly contracts for offender-accountability conferencing and related juvenile restorative-justice services through the statewide juvenile-court system. The contracted service is dedicated primarily to the qualifying restorative mechanism rather than merely embedding an inseparable component in a broader youth-services award. Tier 3 applies.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0789", "src-0790" ] }, { "stateCode": "ND", "stateName": "North Dakota", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F2", "status": "unknown", "statusLabel": "Unknown", "scoreDisplay": "M", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "The state Juvenile Court's current contract for offender-accountability conferencing is available through the statewide juvenile-court system, supporting F3=3. The public record does not establish the annual award history needed to distinguish one contract from a dedicated recurring mechanism, so F2 remains M.", "confidence": "Medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0789", "src-0790" ] }, { "stateCode": "ND", "stateName": "North Dakota", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "The state Juvenile Court's current contract for offender-accountability conferencing is available through the statewide juvenile-court system, supporting F3=3. The public record does not establish the annual award history needed to distinguish one contract from a dedicated recurring mechanism, so F2 remains M.", "confidence": "Medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0789", "src-0790" ] }, { "stateCode": "ND", "stateName": "North Dakota", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "$7.42", "scoreNumeric": 7.42, "reasoning": "FY2025 Title II allocation $616,839 ÷ 83,167 eligible residents ages 10–17 (statutory minimum age 10) = $7.42 per eligible youth. Full precision is retained for scoring.", "confidence": "High — official FY2025 allocation table, verified jurisdiction ages, and 2024 Census single-year-age estimates.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0016", "src-0791", "src-0792" ] }, { "stateCode": "ND", "stateName": "North Dakota", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "4%", "scoreNumeric": 0.04, "reasoning": "2 / 53 = 3.77%", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0793", "src-0794", "src-0795", "src-0796" ] }, { "stateCode": "ND", "stateName": "North Dakota", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "36%", "scoreNumeric": 0.36, "reasoning": "Eligible-age population in verified R1 operating-location counties is 30,055 of 83,167 statewide residents ages 10–17, or 36.14%. Provider locations counted: Burleigh County, Cass County. Claimed service areas were not substituted for physical operating locations.", "confidence": "High for the population calculation; provider-location completeness inherits the R1 evidence limits and is a conservative verified floor.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0793", "src-0794", "src-0795", "src-0796", "src-0797", "src-0798" ] }, { "stateCode": "ND", "stateName": "North Dakota", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Consensus Council and Fargo schools independently operate accountability conferencing and responsive/peacemaking circles across two provider settings.", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0793", "src-0794", "src-0795", "src-0796" ] }, { "stateCode": "ND", "stateName": "North Dakota", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Fargo schools currently use substantive circles and conferences with affected parties, accountability agreements, and repair; the evidence does not establish a formal replacement diversion pathway.", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0793", "src-0794", "src-0795", "src-0796" ] }, { "stateCode": "OH", "stateName": "Ohio", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB1", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "The completed current-law search found no enacted, operative statewide Ohio law recognizing an operational youth RJ mechanism. The only direct youth-related codified mention directs a survey and report rather than RJ use. LB1 is 0.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0799", "src-0800" ] }, { "stateCode": "OH", "stateName": "Ohio", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Ohio's completed current enacted-law search found no qualifying youth-specific restorative-justice recognition. LB2's live scale has no X outcome, so the correct classification is Verified absence/0. Because LB2=0, LB3, LB4, and LA1-LA4 remain Structural N/A/X under the live gateway.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0799" ] }, { "stateCode": "OH", "stateName": "Ohio", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB3", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Ohio's LB1 gateway is 0, so duration cannot be assessed for a nonexistent statewide youth-RJ authority. LB3 is Structural N/A/X.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0799" ] }, { "stateCode": "OH", "stateName": "Ohio", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB4", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Ohio's LB1 gateway is 0, so referral-directive strength for a statewide youth-RJ mechanism cannot be evaluated. LB4 is Structural N/A/X.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0799" ] }, { "stateCode": "OH", "stateName": "Ohio", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA1", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "The live LB2 gateway is not satisfied.", "confidence": "Medium-High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0801", "src-0802", "src-0803" ] }, { "stateCode": "OH", "stateName": "Ohio", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA2", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "The live LB2 gateway is not satisfied.", "confidence": "Medium-High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0801", "src-0802", "src-0803" ] }, { "stateCode": "OH", "stateName": "Ohio", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "The Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction Office of Victim Services administers a victim-initiated dialogue process for offenders under department authority, focused on harm, responsibility, and reparation.", "confidence": "High — direct statewide authority/program review under the revised LA3 rule.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0804" ] }, { "stateCode": "OH", "stateName": "Ohio", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA4", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Ohio has no qualifying statewide youth-RJ pathway to which a completion benefit could attach. LA4 is Structural N/A/X.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0799" ] }, { "stateCode": "OH", "stateName": "Ohio", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "DYS administers a youth-grant framework expressly permitting restorative-justice program development.", "confidence": "Medium-High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0801", "src-0802", "src-0803" ] }, { "stateCode": "OH", "stateName": "Ohio", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "No formal public state–local body substantively dedicated to qualifying youth restorative justice was located.", "confidence": "Medium — The statewide Juvenile Diversion Task Force addressed diversion broadly and completed its work.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0805", "src-0806", "src-0807" ] }, { "stateCode": "OH", "stateName": "Ohio", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "DYS grant materials and Supreme Court guidance provide multiple substantive implementation resources.", "confidence": "Medium-High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0801", "src-0802", "src-0803" ] }, { "stateCode": "OH", "stateName": "Ohio", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Recurring RECLAIM/grant monitoring covers a broader system with an identifiable restorative component, while restorative awards and outcomes are not separately reported.", "confidence": "Medium-High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0801", "src-0802", "src-0803" ] }, { "stateCode": "OH", "stateName": "Ohio", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F1", "status": "unknown", "statusLabel": "Unknown", "scoreDisplay": "M", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Ohio's FY2026–27 Competitive RECLAIM solicitation created a distinct restorative-justice category and scheduled funding during the current period, but the reviewed official record does not identify final recipients or executed restorative awards. A solicitation is not funding, while the unresolved post-award status makes verified absence unsafe. F1 remains M.", "confidence": "Medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0808", "src-0809" ] }, { "stateCode": "OH", "stateName": "Ohio", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F2", "status": "unknown", "statusLabel": "Unknown", "scoreDisplay": "M", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "The current Competitive RECLAIM restorative category remains at the solicitation stage in the reviewed public record. Without final restorative awards, recurrence and funded geography remain unresolved.", "confidence": "Medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0808", "src-0809" ] }, { "stateCode": "OH", "stateName": "Ohio", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F3", "status": "unknown", "statusLabel": "Unknown", "scoreDisplay": "M", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "The current Competitive RECLAIM restorative category remains at the solicitation stage in the reviewed public record. Without final restorative awards, recurrence and funded geography remain unresolved.", "confidence": "Medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0808", "src-0809" ] }, { "stateCode": "OH", "stateName": "Ohio", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "$1.21", "scoreNumeric": 1.21, "reasoning": "FY2025 Title II allocation $1,458,573 ÷ 1,201,940 eligible residents ages 10–17 (age 10 fallback because no general statutory minimum was identified) = $1.21 per eligible youth. Full precision is retained for scoring.", "confidence": "High — official FY2025 allocation table, verified jurisdiction ages, and 2024 Census single-year-age estimates.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0016", "src-0810", "src-0811" ] }, { "stateCode": "OH", "stateName": "Ohio", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2%", "scoreNumeric": 0.02, "reasoning": "2 / 88 = 2.27%", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0812", "src-0813", "src-0814", "src-0815", "src-0816" ] }, { "stateCode": "OH", "stateName": "Ohio", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "21%", "scoreNumeric": 0.21, "reasoning": "Eligible-age population in verified R1 operating-location counties is 252,137 of 1,201,940 statewide residents ages 10–17, or 20.98%. Provider locations counted: Cuyahoga County, Franklin County. Claimed service areas were not substituted for physical operating locations.", "confidence": "High for the population calculation; provider-location completeness inherits the R1 evidence limits and is a conservative verified floor.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0812", "src-0813", "src-0814", "src-0815", "src-0816", "src-0817", "src-0818" ] }, { "stateCode": "OH", "stateName": "Ohio", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Current county and school sources independently establish restorative circles and restorative/reentry conferencing across multiple jurisdictions.", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0812", "src-0813", "src-0814", "src-0815", "src-0816" ] }, { "stateCode": "OH", "stateName": "Ohio", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "Columbus and Cleveland currently use restorative responses as formal alternatives to suspension or punitive discipline, including reentry and harm-repair conferencing.", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0812", "src-0813", "src-0814", "src-0815", "src-0816" ] }, { "stateCode": "OK", "stateName": "Oklahoma", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB1", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Oklahoma's Juvenile Code contains no express RJ mechanism or cross-reference to the criminal deferred-prosecution pilot. The Title 22 pilot applies to accused persons facing criminal information under the traditional prosecution model, not children in Title 10A petition proceedings. LB1 is 0.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0819", "src-0820" ] }, { "stateCode": "OK", "stateName": "Oklahoma", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Oklahoma's completed current enacted-law search found no qualifying youth-specific restorative-justice recognition. LB2's live scale has no X outcome, so the correct classification is Verified absence/0. Because LB2=0, LB3, LB4, and LA1-LA4 remain Structural N/A/X under the live gateway.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0819" ] }, { "stateCode": "OK", "stateName": "Oklahoma", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB3", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Oklahoma's LB1 gateway is 0, so duration cannot be assessed for a nonexistent statewide youth-RJ authority. LB3 is Structural N/A/X.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0819" ] }, { "stateCode": "OK", "stateName": "Oklahoma", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB4", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Oklahoma's LB1 gateway is 0, so referral-directive strength for a statewide youth-RJ mechanism cannot be evaluated. LB4 is Structural N/A/X.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0819" ] }, { "stateCode": "OK", "stateName": "Oklahoma", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA1", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "The live LB2 gateway is not satisfied.", "confidence": "Medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0821", "src-0822" ] }, { "stateCode": "OK", "stateName": "Oklahoma", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA2", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "The live LB2 gateway is not satisfied.", "confidence": "Medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0821", "src-0822" ] }, { "stateCode": "OK", "stateName": "Oklahoma", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Oklahoma DOC currently offers a guided Victim/Offender Dialogue for victims or community advocates and inmates, addressing impact, responsibility, restoration, and community repair. This independently supports 1 even apart from Oklahoma’s time-limited district-attorney pilot statute.", "confidence": "High — direct statewide authority/program review under the revised LA3 rule.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0823" ] }, { "stateCode": "OK", "stateName": "Oklahoma", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA4", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Oklahoma has no qualifying statewide youth-RJ pathway to which a completion benefit could attach. LA4 is Structural N/A/X.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0819" ] }, { "stateCode": "OK", "stateName": "Oklahoma", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Existing state juvenile-grant administration expressly describes graduated sanctions using restorative-justice principles.", "confidence": "Medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0821", "src-0822" ] }, { "stateCode": "OK", "stateName": "Oklahoma", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "No formal public state–local body substantively dedicated to youth restorative justice was located.", "confidence": "Medium — Local youth-service agencies are contractors rather than a coordinating body.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0824", "src-0825", "src-0826" ] }, { "stateCode": "OK", "stateName": "Oklahoma", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Current state program and grant pages provide basic implementation references only.", "confidence": "Medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0821", "src-0822" ] }, { "stateCode": "OK", "stateName": "Oklahoma", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Required broader-system grant monitoring exists, but restorative activity is not separately reported.", "confidence": "Medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0821", "src-0822" ] }, { "stateCode": "OK", "stateName": "Oklahoma", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F1", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "The completed current state budget, OJA grant, contract, award, procurement, restorative-process, and secondary-lead search did not identify a final state-origin award or operating allocation for a qualifying youth restorative process. Federal Title II activity, broad graduated sanctions, adult criminal programming, training, and an institutional restorative philosophy are excluded.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0827", "src-0828" ] }, { "stateCode": "OK", "stateName": "Oklahoma", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Revised F1 is Verified absence / 0 after the completed state-origin funding search. Under the live dependency rule, F2 is Structural N/A / X; excluded federal, school-only, local-only, generic-diversion, proposed, or out-of-period funding is not reused.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0827", "src-0828" ] }, { "stateCode": "OK", "stateName": "Oklahoma", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F3", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Revised F1 is Verified absence / 0 after the completed state-origin funding search. Under the live dependency rule, F3 is Structural N/A / X; excluded federal, school-only, local-only, generic-diversion, proposed, or out-of-period funding is not reused.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0827", "src-0828" ] }, { "stateCode": "OK", "stateName": "Oklahoma", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "$1.52", "scoreNumeric": 1.52, "reasoning": "FY2025 Title II allocation $689,098 ÷ 454,350 eligible residents ages 10–17 (age 10 fallback because no general statutory minimum was identified) = $1.52 per eligible youth. Full precision is retained for scoring.", "confidence": "High — official FY2025 allocation table, verified jurisdiction ages, and 2024 Census single-year-age estimates.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0016", "src-0829", "src-0830" ] }, { "stateCode": "OK", "stateName": "Oklahoma", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1%", "scoreNumeric": 0.01, "reasoning": "1 / 77 = 1.30%", "confidence": "medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0831", "src-0832", "src-0833" ] }, { "stateCode": "OK", "stateName": "Oklahoma", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "17%", "scoreNumeric": 0.17, "reasoning": "Eligible-age population in verified R1 operating-location counties is 78,978 of 454,350 statewide residents ages 10–17, or 17.38%. Provider locations counted: Tulsa County. Claimed service areas were not substituted for physical operating locations.", "confidence": "High for the population calculation; provider-location completeness inherits the R1 evidence limits and is a conservative verified floor.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0831", "src-0832", "src-0833", "src-0834", "src-0835" ] }, { "stateCode": "OK", "stateName": "Oklahoma", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "The verified current delivery evidence establishes one substantive restorative-circle/conference family in Tulsa; no second independent functional approach was verified.", "confidence": "medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0831", "src-0832", "src-0833" ] }, { "stateCode": "OK", "stateName": "Oklahoma", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Tulsa schools currently use restorative circles with affected parties, accountability, and repair as alternatives to exclusionary discipline, but not as a documented formal diversion pathway.", "confidence": "medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0831", "src-0832", "src-0833" ] }, { "stateCode": "OR", "stateName": "Oregon", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Oregon expressly establishes an Oregon Youth Authority restorative-justice program using facilitated dialogues and responsibility letter banks with adjudicated youths, victims, and survivors. LB1 is 1.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0836" ] }, { "stateCode": "OR", "stateName": "Oregon", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "A dedicated statutory series addresses named youth restorative processes, participants, communications, confidentiality, liability, and rulemaking. The significant youth focus earns 2.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0836" ] }, { "stateCode": "OR", "stateName": "Oregon", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "The OYA restorative-justice program is permanent codified law with no pilot term or sunset. Oregon earns 2.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0836" ] }, { "stateCode": "OR", "stateName": "Oregon", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "The law establishes and regulates the OYA program but imposes no case-level duty on a court, prosecutor, or OYA official to consider or offer it to an eligible youth. LB4 is 0.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0836" ] }, { "stateCode": "OR", "stateName": "Oregon", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "ORS 420A.300–.315 name adjudicated youth as participants but contain no meaningful statewide offense-eligibility rule.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0837", "src-0838" ] }, { "stateCode": "OR", "stateName": "Oregon", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "The completed controlling-law search found no meaningful statewide prior-contact rule.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0837", "src-0838" ] }, { "stateCode": "OR", "stateName": "Oregon", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "The Oregon Criminal Justice Commission administers a current statewide Restorative Justice Grant Program. Current funded work includes a Young Adult Diversion Program using pre-charge restorative processes, directly covering at least some people ages 18–25.", "confidence": "High — direct statewide authority/program review under the revised LA3 rule.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0839", "src-0840" ] }, { "stateCode": "OR", "stateName": "Oregon", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA4", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Oregon's RJ series guarantees confidentiality but no nonfiling, dismissal, sealing, expungement, or other case benefit upon successful program completion. LA4 is 0.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0836" ] }, { "stateCode": "OR", "stateName": "Oregon", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "The Criminal Justice Commission administers a statutory restorative-justice grant program.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0837", "src-0838" ] }, { "stateCode": "OR", "stateName": "Oregon", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Oregon maintains a formal Restorative Justice Advisory Committee with state and practitioner representation.", "confidence": "Medium — Recent meeting activity and geographically diverse local representation were not fully documented for tier 3.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0841", "src-0842", "src-0843" ] }, { "stateCode": "OR", "stateName": "Oregon", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "State grant rules and program materials provide recurring guidance and tools.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0837", "src-0838" ] }, { "stateCode": "OR", "stateName": "Oregon", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "Recurring public grant reporting provides provider/jurisdiction funding and implementation detail.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0837", "src-0838" ] }, { "stateCode": "OR", "stateName": "Oregon", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "The Oregon Criminal Justice Commission's final 2025–27 award record identifies a $121,384 state Restorative Justice Grant to Clackamas County Resolution Services for a youth-only, pre-adjudication restorative-dialogue program. This is funding dedicated primarily to a qualifying restorative youth-diversion program, so tier 3 applies.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0844", "src-0845" ] }, { "stateCode": "OR", "stateName": "Oregon", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "The final 2025–27 record identifies one qualifying youth-only $121,384 award in Clackamas County. The solicitation expressly describes the award as one-time, so F2=1; one funded county supports F3=1.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0844", "src-0845" ] }, { "stateCode": "OR", "stateName": "Oregon", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "The final 2025–27 record identifies one qualifying youth-only $121,384 award in Clackamas County. The solicitation expressly describes the award as one-time, so F2=1; one funded county supports F3=1.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0844", "src-0845" ] }, { "stateCode": "OR", "stateName": "Oregon", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "$1.67", "scoreNumeric": 1.67, "reasoning": "FY2025 Title II allocation $667,119 ÷ 398,861 eligible residents ages 10–17 (age 10 fallback because no general statutory minimum was identified) = $1.67 per eligible youth. Full precision is retained for scoring.", "confidence": "High — official FY2025 allocation table, verified jurisdiction ages, and 2024 Census single-year-age estimates.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0016", "src-0846", "src-0847" ] }, { "stateCode": "OR", "stateName": "Oregon", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "19%", "scoreNumeric": 0.19, "reasoning": "7 / 36 = 19.44%", "confidence": "medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0848", "src-0849", "src-0850", "src-0851", "src-0852" ] }, { "stateCode": "OR", "stateName": "Oregon", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "61%", "scoreNumeric": 0.61, "reasoning": "Eligible-age population in verified R1 operating-location counties is 241,493 of 398,861 statewide residents ages 10–17, or 60.55%. Provider locations counted: Clackamas County, Deschutes County, Hood River County, Jackson County, Lane County, Multnomah County, Washington County. Claimed service areas were not substituted for physical operating locations.", "confidence": "High for the population calculation; provider-location completeness inherits the R1 evidence limits and is a conservative verified floor.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0848", "src-0849", "src-0850", "src-0851", "src-0852", "src-0853", "src-0854" ] }, { "stateCode": "OR", "stateName": "Oregon", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "Current provider directories independently identify restorative dialogue, victim-offender mediation, conferencing, circles, and youth-accountability programming across multiple providers and counties.", "confidence": "medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0848", "src-0849", "src-0850", "src-0851", "src-0852" ] }, { "stateCode": "OR", "stateName": "Oregon", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "Portland Public Schools currently uses restorative meetings and harm-repair processes that can reduce or eliminate major discipline referrals.", "confidence": "medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0848", "src-0849", "src-0850", "src-0851", "src-0852" ] }, { "stateCode": "PA", "stateName": "Pennsylvania", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Pennsylvania's Juvenile Act requires the system to provide programs balancing community protection, accountability, and competency development, which the official Juvenile Court Judges’ Commission identifies as the statutorily established Balanced and Restorative Justice mission. LB1 is 1.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0855", "src-0856" ] }, { "stateCode": "PA", "stateName": "Pennsylvania", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "BARJ is not an isolated mention: it is the foundational statutory mission governing programs for delinquent children across the Juvenile Act. The significant, systemwide youth focus earns 2.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0855", "src-0856" ] }, { "stateCode": "PA", "stateName": "Pennsylvania", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "The BARJ mission is permanent codified law with no pilot term or sunset. Pennsylvania earns 2.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0855" ] }, { "stateCode": "PA", "stateName": "Pennsylvania", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "The Juvenile Act must be interpreted to effectuate its purposes and calls for programs providing balanced attention to BARJ goals, making RJ the preferred system orientation. It does not require an individual RJ offer or documented case-level consideration. LB4 is 1.", "confidence": "Medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0855", "src-0856" ] }, { "stateCode": "PA", "stateName": "Pennsylvania", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "The BARJ mission reaches many serious and violent delinquency cases, while murder and listed serious cases prosecuted outside juvenile court are excluded.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0857", "src-0858" ] }, { "stateCode": "PA", "stateName": "Pennsylvania", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "Only specified serious prior adjudications combined with listed new conduct create the relevant automatic exclusion.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0857", "src-0858" ] }, { "stateCode": "PA", "stateName": "Pennsylvania", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Pennsylvania’s Office of Victim Advocate currently administers victim-initiated Victim Offender Dialogue with incarcerated adults or people on parole, using trained facilitators and focusing on accountability and repair of harm.", "confidence": "High — direct statewide authority/program review under the revised LA3 rule.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0859" ] }, { "stateCode": "PA", "stateName": "Pennsylvania", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA4", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "The Juvenile Act's BARJ mission supplies no nonfiling, dismissal, sealing, or expungement benefit tied to successful completion of a restorative process. LA4 is 0.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0855" ] }, { "stateCode": "PA", "stateName": "Pennsylvania", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Existing statewide juvenile-justice administration has an explicit balanced-and-restorative mission.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0857", "src-0858" ] }, { "stateCode": "PA", "stateName": "Pennsylvania", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "No formal public state–local body substantively dedicated to youth restorative justice was located.", "confidence": "Medium — The commission and local courts form a system, but not a distinct GA2 body.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0860", "src-0861", "src-0862" ] }, { "stateCode": "PA", "stateName": "Pennsylvania", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "State improvement funding, guidance, and implementation resources provide recurring support.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0857", "src-0858" ] }, { "stateCode": "PA", "stateName": "Pennsylvania", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "Recurring public reports provide county/program funding, participation, and outcome detail.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0857", "src-0858" ] }, { "stateCode": "PA", "stateName": "Pennsylvania", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F1", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Pennsylvania's balanced-and-restorative mandate and current broad juvenile-justice, delinquency-prevention, violence-prevention, out-of-school-time, and victim-services funding do not establish an award for a program meeting the qualifying youth-RJ process test. The completed current state-origin award and procurement search supports 0.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0863", "src-0864" ] }, { "stateCode": "PA", "stateName": "Pennsylvania", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Revised F1 is Verified absence / 0 after the completed state-origin funding search. Under the live dependency rule, F2 is Structural N/A / X; excluded federal, school-only, local-only, generic-diversion, proposed, or out-of-period funding is not reused.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0863", "src-0864" ] }, { "stateCode": "PA", "stateName": "Pennsylvania", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F3", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Revised F1 is Verified absence / 0 after the completed state-origin funding search. Under the live dependency rule, F3 is Structural N/A / X; excluded federal, school-only, local-only, generic-diversion, proposed, or out-of-period funding is not reused.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0863", "src-0864" ] }, { "stateCode": "PA", "stateName": "Pennsylvania", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "$1.12", "scoreNumeric": 1.12, "reasoning": "FY2025 Title II allocation $1,389,911 ÷ 1,239,508 eligible residents ages 10–17 (statutory minimum age 10) = $1.12 per eligible youth. Full precision is retained for scoring.", "confidence": "High — official FY2025 allocation table, verified jurisdiction ages, and 2024 Census single-year-age estimates.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0016", "src-0865", "src-0866" ] }, { "stateCode": "PA", "stateName": "Pennsylvania", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3%", "scoreNumeric": 0.03, "reasoning": "2 / 67 = 2.99%", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0867", "src-0868", "src-0869", "src-0870" ] }, { "stateCode": "PA", "stateName": "Pennsylvania", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "16%", "scoreNumeric": 0.16, "reasoning": "Eligible-age population in verified R1 operating-location counties is 202,704 of 1,239,508 statewide residents ages 10–17, or 16.35%. Provider locations counted: Lancaster County, Philadelphia County. Claimed service areas were not substituted for physical operating locations.", "confidence": "High for the population calculation; provider-location completeness inherits the R1 evidence limits and is a conservative verified floor.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0867", "src-0868", "src-0869", "src-0870", "src-0871", "src-0872" ] }, { "stateCode": "PA", "stateName": "Pennsylvania", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Advoz and Healing Futures independently deliver making-it-right/conferencing and community restorative-circle approaches in two counties.", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0867", "src-0868", "src-0869", "src-0870" ] }, { "stateCode": "PA", "stateName": "Pennsylvania", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Philadelphia schools currently use harm/healing circles and behavioral/reentry supports, but no formal school-diversion replacement pathway was verified.", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0867", "src-0868", "src-0869", "src-0870" ] }, { "stateCode": "RI", "stateName": "Rhode Island", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB1", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "The completed current-law search found no enacted, operative statewide Rhode Island youth-RJ mechanism. Express juvenile and school RJ measures remained proposals, while generic cannabis-fund language is not youth-specific. LB1 is 0.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0873", "src-0874" ] }, { "stateCode": "RI", "stateName": "Rhode Island", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Rhode Island's completed current enacted-law search found no qualifying youth-specific restorative-justice recognition. LB2's live scale has no X outcome, so the correct classification is Verified absence/0. Because LB2=0, LB3, LB4, and LA1-LA4 remain Structural N/A/X under the live gateway.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0873" ] }, { "stateCode": "RI", "stateName": "Rhode Island", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB3", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Rhode Island's LB1 gateway is 0, so duration cannot be assessed for a nonexistent statewide youth-RJ authority. LB3 is Structural N/A/X.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0873" ] }, { "stateCode": "RI", "stateName": "Rhode Island", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB4", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Rhode Island's LB1 gateway is 0, so referral-directive strength for a statewide youth-RJ mechanism cannot be evaluated. LB4 is Structural N/A/X.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0873" ] }, { "stateCode": "RI", "stateName": "Rhode Island", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA1", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "The live LB2 gateway is not satisfied.", "confidence": "Medium-High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0875", "src-0876" ] }, { "stateCode": "RI", "stateName": "Rhode Island", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA2", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "The live LB2 gateway is not satisfied.", "confidence": "Medium-High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0875", "src-0876" ] }, { "stateCode": "RI", "stateName": "Rhode Island", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA3", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "A completed search of current Rhode Island statutes, corrections victim services, judiciary programs, and state diversion materials found no statewide adult referral to a qualifying restorative process. Located restorative pathways were juvenile or local/community programs without statewide adult authorization or administration.", "confidence": "Medium-high — direct statewide authority/program review under the revised LA3 rule.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0877", "src-0878" ] }, { "stateCode": "RI", "stateName": "Rhode Island", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA4", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Rhode Island has no qualifying statewide youth-RJ pathway to which a completion benefit could attach. LA4 is Structural N/A/X.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0873" ] }, { "stateCode": "RI", "stateName": "Rhode Island", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Existing state youth-justice administration supports a diversion system containing identifiable restorative youth/teen-court components.", "confidence": "Medium-High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0875", "src-0876" ] }, { "stateCode": "RI", "stateName": "Rhode Island", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "The Juvenile Justice Advisory Committee includes state and community participants and substantively funds local restorative sanctions and training.", "confidence": "Medium — The body is broad juvenile justice, and the depth of recurring youth-RJ agenda work is not fully documented.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0879", "src-0880", "src-0881" ] }, { "stateCode": "RI", "stateName": "Rhode Island", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "State grant and court materials provide recurring guidance and implementation resources.", "confidence": "Medium-High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0875", "src-0876" ] }, { "stateCode": "RI", "stateName": "Rhode Island", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Recurring public aggregate reporting identifies restorative-capable diversion activity but does not consistently provide provider-level outcomes.", "confidence": "Medium-High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0875", "src-0876" ] }, { "stateCode": "RI", "stateName": "Rhode Island", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F1", "status": "unknown", "statusLabel": "Unknown", "scoreDisplay": "M", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Rhode Island DCYF contracts with community youth-diversion providers, and current official materials identify Juvenile Hearing Boards as restorative accountability mechanisms. The funding record, however, does not resolve whether qualifying current board/provider support is state-origin or federal Title II pass-through funding; the current contract descriptions also combine mediation, family stabilization, case management, and preventive supports. F1 remains a true M.", "confidence": "Medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0882", "src-0883" ] }, { "stateCode": "RI", "stateName": "Rhode Island", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F2", "status": "unknown", "statusLabel": "Unknown", "scoreDisplay": "M", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "The state/federal origin of current qualifying diversion support remains unresolved, and no qualifying state-funded roster has been established. F2 and F3 remain M.", "confidence": "Medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0882", "src-0883" ] }, { "stateCode": "RI", "stateName": "Rhode Island", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F3", "status": "unknown", "statusLabel": "Unknown", "scoreDisplay": "M", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "The state/federal origin of current qualifying diversion support remains unresolved, and no qualifying state-funded roster has been established. F2 and F3 remain M.", "confidence": "Medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0882", "src-0883" ] }, { "stateCode": "RI", "stateName": "Rhode Island", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "$6.49", "scoreNumeric": 6.49, "reasoning": "FY2025 Title II allocation $618,883 ÷ 95,356 eligible residents ages 10–17 (age 10 fallback because no general statutory minimum was identified) = $6.49 per eligible youth. Full precision is retained for scoring.", "confidence": "High — official FY2025 allocation table, verified jurisdiction ages, and 2024 Census single-year-age estimates.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0016", "src-0884", "src-0885" ] }, { "stateCode": "RI", "stateName": "Rhode Island", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "100%", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "5 / 5 = 100.00%", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0886", "src-0887", "src-0888", "src-0889", "src-0890" ] }, { "stateCode": "RI", "stateName": "Rhode Island", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "100%", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Eligible-age population in verified R1 operating-location counties is 95,356 of 95,356 statewide residents ages 10–17, or 100.00%. Provider locations counted: Bristol County, Kent County, Newport County, Providence County, Washington County. Claimed service areas were not substituted for physical operating locations.", "confidence": "High for the population calculation; provider-location completeness inherits the R1 evidence limits and is a conservative verified floor.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0886", "src-0887", "src-0888", "src-0889", "src-0890", "src-0891", "src-0892" ] }, { "stateCode": "RI", "stateName": "Rhode Island", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Current statewide Juvenile Hearing Board delivery and school restorative conferences establish peer/community diversion and restorative-conference approaches across multiple jurisdictions.", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0886", "src-0887", "src-0888", "src-0889", "src-0890" ] }, { "stateCode": "RI", "stateName": "Rhode Island", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "Central Falls currently operates RASP as an alternative to suspension, using restorative conferences, repair of harm, and community obligations.", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0886", "src-0887", "src-0888" ] }, { "stateCode": "SC", "stateName": "South Carolina", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB1", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "The completed enacted-law search found no current statewide South Carolina youth-RJ mechanism. The Juvenile Justice Code authorizes generic diversion and restitution but does not describe a qualifying restorative process, and the express RJ study proposal did not become law. LB1 is 0.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0893", "src-0894" ] }, { "stateCode": "SC", "stateName": "South Carolina", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "South Carolina's completed current enacted-law search found no qualifying youth-specific restorative-justice recognition. LB2's live scale has no X outcome, so the correct classification is Verified absence/0. Because LB2=0, LB3, LB4, and LA1-LA4 remain Structural N/A/X under the live gateway.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0893" ] }, { "stateCode": "SC", "stateName": "South Carolina", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB3", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "South Carolina's LB1 gateway is 0, so duration cannot be assessed for a nonexistent statewide youth-RJ authority. LB3 is Structural N/A/X.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0893" ] }, { "stateCode": "SC", "stateName": "South Carolina", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB4", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "South Carolina's LB1 gateway is 0, so referral-directive strength for a statewide youth-RJ mechanism cannot be evaluated. LB4 is Structural N/A/X.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0893" ] }, { "stateCode": "SC", "stateName": "South Carolina", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA1", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "The live LB2 gateway is not satisfied.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0895", "src-0896" ] }, { "stateCode": "SC", "stateName": "South Carolina", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA2", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "The live LB2 gateway is not satisfied.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0895", "src-0896" ] }, { "stateCode": "SC", "stateName": "South Carolina", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "South Carolina DOC currently lists and staffs a statewide Victim Offender Dialogue program within its Restorative Justice Programs, including adult male and female institutions.", "confidence": "High — direct statewide authority/program review under the revised LA3 rule.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0897" ] }, { "stateCode": "SC", "stateName": "South Carolina", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA4", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "South Carolina has no qualifying statewide youth-RJ pathway to which a completion benefit could attach. LA4 is Structural N/A/X.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0893" ] }, { "stateCode": "SC", "stateName": "South Carolina", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Existing state juvenile-justice administration has an explicit restorative/balanced-justice role.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0895", "src-0896" ] }, { "stateCode": "SC", "stateName": "South Carolina", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "The all-circuit program is administered through agreements, but no formal public state–local coordinating body or committee was located.", "confidence": "High — Program partnerships are not the same as a governance body under GA2.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0898", "src-0899", "src-0900" ] }, { "stateCode": "SC", "stateName": "South Carolina", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "Statewide training, program models, and implementation infrastructure provide substantial support.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0895", "src-0896" ] }, { "stateCode": "SC", "stateName": "South Carolina", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "Recurring public reports provide program/jurisdiction-level participation and outcome detail.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0895", "src-0896" ] }, { "stateCode": "SC", "stateName": "South Carolina", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "South Carolina's FY2025–26 appropriation directs DJJ to contract for the balanced-and-restorative Juvenile Arbitration Program in all 16 judicial circuits and authorizes up to $60,000 per circuit based on services rendered. Because the contract mechanism is dedicated primarily to the qualifying restorative juvenile alternative, tier 3 applies; actual disbursement totals are not required by revised F1.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0901", "src-0902" ] }, { "stateCode": "SC", "stateName": "South Carolina", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "The Juvenile Arbitration Program is supported by a dedicated recurring annual state appropriation and DJJ contract mechanism. The current proviso directs the same qualifying contracts through all 16 judicial circuits, the controlling funded units. F2 and F3 are both 3.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0901", "src-0902" ] }, { "stateCode": "SC", "stateName": "South Carolina", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "The Juvenile Arbitration Program is supported by a dedicated recurring annual state appropriation and DJJ contract mechanism. The current proviso directs the same qualifying contracts through all 16 judicial circuits, the controlling funded units. F2 and F3 are both 3.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0901", "src-0902" ] }, { "stateCode": "SC", "stateName": "South Carolina", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "$1.08", "scoreNumeric": 1.08, "reasoning": "FY2025 Title II allocation $587,426 ÷ 542,034 eligible residents ages 10–17 (age 10 fallback because no general statutory minimum was identified) = $1.08 per eligible youth. Full precision is retained for scoring.", "confidence": "High — official FY2025 allocation table, verified jurisdiction ages, and 2024 Census single-year-age estimates.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0016", "src-0903", "src-0904" ] }, { "stateCode": "SC", "stateName": "South Carolina", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "98%", "scoreNumeric": 0.98, "reasoning": "45 of 46 county-equivalents contain at least one verified current youth-RJ operating location (97.83%; entered as 98%). The controlling FY2025 state prosecution report contains a county-by-county Juvenile Arbitration table for July 1, 2024 through June 30, 2025. Its legend distinguishes a locally present solicitor program from a program located in another county, an external entity, and a program not present. Forty-five county rows are coded as locally present; Georgetown alone is coded program-not-present. Even counties showing zero annual case activity were counted only where the table identifies a local operating program. The current SCDJJ program page independently verifies youth focus, restorative qualification, victim/community participation, and statewide current operation.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0905", "src-0906" ] }, { "stateCode": "SC", "stateName": "South Carolina", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "99%", "scoreNumeric": 0.99, "reasoning": "Eligible-age population in verified R1 operating-location counties is 536,692 of 542,034 statewide residents ages 10–17, or 99.01%. Provider locations counted: Abbeville County, Aiken County, Allendale County, Anderson County, Bamberg County, Barnwell County, Beaufort County, Berkeley County, Calhoun County, Charleston County, Cherokee County, Chester County, Chesterfield County, Clarendon County, Colleton County, Darlington County, Dillon County, Dorchester County, Edgefield County, Fairfield County, Florence County, Greenville County, Greenwood County, Hampton County, Horry County, Jasper County, Kershaw County, Lancaster County, Laurens County, Lee County, Lexington County, Marion County, Marlboro County, McCormick County, Newberry County, Oconee County, Orangeburg County, Pickens County, Richland County, Saluda County, Spartanburg County, Sumter County, Union County, Williamsburg County, York County. Claimed service areas were not substituted for physical operating locations.", "confidence": "High for the population calculation; provider-location completeness inherits the R1 evidence limits and is a conservative verified floor.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0905", "src-0906", "src-0907", "src-0908" ] }, { "stateCode": "SC", "stateName": "South Carolina", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "The current statewide evidence establishes one community juvenile arbitration/conferencing approach; no independently verified second functional approach was located.", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0909", "src-0910", "src-0911", "src-0912", "src-0913", "src-0914", "src-0915", "src-0916", "src-0917", "src-0918", "src-0919", "src-0920", "src-0921", "src-0922", "src-0923" ] }, { "stateCode": "SC", "stateName": "South Carolina", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "The current juvenile process allows school-originated referrals to enter a solicitor diversion route, and Community Juvenile Arbitration replaces formal prosecution with a victim/community repair conference.", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0909", "src-0910", "src-0911", "src-0912", "src-0913", "src-0914", "src-0915", "src-0916", "src-0917", "src-0918", "src-0919", "src-0920", "src-0921", "src-0922", "src-0923" ] }, { "stateCode": "SD", "stateName": "South Dakota", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB1", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "The completed current-law search found no enacted statewide South Dakota youth-RJ mechanism. The documented restorative diversion program is local to Beadle County rather than created or required by statewide law. LB1 is 0.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0924", "src-0925" ] }, { "stateCode": "SD", "stateName": "South Dakota", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "South Dakota's completed current enacted-law search found no qualifying youth-specific restorative-justice recognition. LB2's live scale has no X outcome, so the correct classification is Verified absence/0. Because LB2=0, LB3, LB4, and LA1-LA4 remain Structural N/A/X under the live gateway.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0924" ] }, { "stateCode": "SD", "stateName": "South Dakota", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB3", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "South Dakota's LB1 gateway is 0, so duration cannot be assessed for a nonexistent statewide youth-RJ authority. LB3 is Structural N/A/X.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0924" ] }, { "stateCode": "SD", "stateName": "South Dakota", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB4", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "South Dakota's LB1 gateway is 0, so referral-directive strength for a statewide youth-RJ mechanism cannot be evaluated. LB4 is Structural N/A/X.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0924" ] }, { "stateCode": "SD", "stateName": "South Dakota", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA1", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "The live LB2 gateway is not satisfied.", "confidence": "High for GA4's reporting requirement; Medium for GA1/GA3", "sourceIds": [ "src-0926", "src-0927", "src-0928" ] }, { "stateCode": "SD", "stateName": "South Dakota", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA2", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "The live LB2 gateway is not satisfied.", "confidence": "High for GA4's reporting requirement; Medium for GA1/GA3", "sourceIds": [ "src-0926", "src-0927", "src-0928" ] }, { "stateCode": "SD", "stateName": "South Dakota", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA3", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "A completed search of current statutes, adult corrections, victim services, court programs, and state grant materials found no statewide adult referral to a qualifying restorative process. Located restorative justice pathways were juvenile, tribal, local, or educational rather than state-authorized adult referrals.", "confidence": "Medium-high — direct statewide authority/program review under the revised LA3 rule.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0929", "src-0930" ] }, { "stateCode": "SD", "stateName": "South Dakota", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA4", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "South Dakota has no qualifying statewide youth-RJ pathway to which a completion benefit could attach. LA4 is Structural N/A/X.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0924" ] }, { "stateCode": "SD", "stateName": "South Dakota", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "The Unified Judicial System supports court-approved youth diversion and expressly identifies teen court as restorative.", "confidence": "High for GA4's reporting requirement; Medium for GA1/GA3", "sourceIds": [ "src-0926", "src-0927", "src-0928" ] }, { "stateCode": "SD", "stateName": "South Dakota", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "No formal public state–local body substantively dedicated to youth restorative justice was located.", "confidence": "Medium — The Teen Court Association is a network, but its public-governance status and state representation were not verified.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0931", "src-0932", "src-0933" ] }, { "stateCode": "SD", "stateName": "South Dakota", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "UJS publishes current basic program information and an approved-provider directory, but no recurring youth-RJ training function was verified.", "confidence": "High for GA4's reporting requirement; Medium for GA1/GA3", "sourceIds": [ "src-0926", "src-0927", "src-0928" ] }, { "stateCode": "SD", "stateName": "South Dakota", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "State law requires semiannual reporting for the broader court-approved diversion system containing restorative teen court; restorative participation is not separately reported.", "confidence": "High for GA4's reporting requirement; Medium for GA1/GA3", "sourceIds": [ "src-0926", "src-0927", "src-0928" ] }, { "stateCode": "SD", "stateName": "South Dakota", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F1", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "South Dakota's statewide per-completion diversion incentive and juvenile reimbursement programs fund diversion generally and do not require or itemize a qualifying restorative process. The completed FY2025–26 budget, contract, grant, restorative-process, and award search found no identifiable state-origin youth-RJ award.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0934", "src-0935" ] }, { "stateCode": "SD", "stateName": "South Dakota", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Revised F1 is Verified absence / 0 after the completed state-origin funding search. Under the live dependency rule, F2 is Structural N/A / X; excluded federal, school-only, local-only, generic-diversion, proposed, or out-of-period funding is not reused.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0934", "src-0935" ] }, { "stateCode": "SD", "stateName": "South Dakota", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F3", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Revised F1 is Verified absence / 0 after the completed state-origin funding search. Under the live dependency rule, F3 is Structural N/A / X; excluded federal, school-only, local-only, generic-diversion, proposed, or out-of-period funding is not reused.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0934", "src-0935" ] }, { "stateCode": "SD", "stateName": "South Dakota", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "$6.10", "scoreNumeric": 6.1, "reasoning": "FY2025 Title II allocation $620,198 ÷ 101,646 eligible residents ages 10–17 (age 10 fallback because no general statutory minimum was identified) = $6.10 per eligible youth. Full precision is retained for scoring.", "confidence": "High — official FY2025 allocation table, verified jurisdiction ages, and 2024 Census single-year-age estimates.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0016", "src-0936", "src-0937" ] }, { "stateCode": "SD", "stateName": "South Dakota", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "12%", "scoreNumeric": 0.12, "reasoning": "8 / 66 = 12.12%", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0938", "src-0939", "src-0940", "src-0941" ] }, { "stateCode": "SD", "stateName": "South Dakota", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "25%", "scoreNumeric": 0.25, "reasoning": "Eligible-age population in verified R1 operating-location counties is 25,191 of 101,646 statewide residents ages 10–17, or 24.78%. Provider locations counted: Brookings County, Butte County, Codington County, Lawrence County, Moody County, Pennington County, Spink County, Yankton County. Claimed service areas were not substituted for physical operating locations.", "confidence": "High for the population calculation; provider-location completeness inherits the R1 evidence limits and is a conservative verified floor.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0938", "src-0939", "src-0940", "src-0941", "src-0942", "src-0943" ] }, { "stateCode": "SD", "stateName": "South Dakota", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "The current UJS directory establishes teen courts across eight counties, and the independently operated Oyate Court supplies a distinct Indigenous restorative court approach.", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0938", "src-0939", "src-0940", "src-0941" ] }, { "stateCode": "SD", "stateName": "South Dakota", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R4", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "A completed school-route search found no current operational school-discipline/offense restorative diversion pathway meeting the tier criteria.", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0938", "src-0939", "src-0940", "src-0941" ] }, { "stateCode": "TN", "stateName": "Tennessee", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Tennessee expressly requires juvenile courts to identify whether an available restorative-justice program may appropriately substitute for financial restitution after delinquent conduct caused loss. LB1 is 1.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0944" ] }, { "stateCode": "TN", "stateName": "Tennessee", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "RJ receives a substantive but brief mention inside the juvenile restitution provision rather than a dedicated youth-RJ framework. The general youth focus earns 1.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0944" ] }, { "stateCode": "TN", "stateName": "Tennessee", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "The restitution-linked youth-RJ authority is permanent codified law with no pilot term or sunset. Tennessee earns 2.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0944" ] }, { "stateCode": "TN", "stateName": "Tennessee", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "When monetary loss resulted, the juvenile court must identify whether an available RJ program may appropriately replace restitution. This is required case-level consideration, not a required offer, so LB4 is 2.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0944" ] }, { "stateCode": "TN", "stateName": "Tennessee", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "4", "scoreNumeric": 4, "reasoning": "The restorative-justice consideration duty applies to a child found delinquent when monetary harm resulted and uses case-specific appropriateness rather than a broad offense exclusion.", "confidence": "High for Legal; Medium-High for bounded Governance absence", "sourceIds": [ "src-0945", "src-0946" ] }, { "stateCode": "TN", "stateName": "Tennessee", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "4", "scoreNumeric": 4, "reasoning": "The statute expressly addresses second or subsequent delinquent acts without withdrawing restorative eligibility.", "confidence": "High for Legal; Medium-High for bounded Governance absence", "sourceIds": [ "src-0945", "src-0946" ] }, { "stateCode": "TN", "stateName": "Tennessee", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Tennessee’s statewide community-corrections statute authorizes victim-offender mediation as a noncustodial option for adult offenders, and separate statewide law authorizes counties to fund victim-offender mediation centers. This is an authorized new referral process, not supervision alone.", "confidence": "High — direct statewide authority/program review under the revised LA3 rule.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0947", "src-0948" ] }, { "stateCode": "TN", "stateName": "Tennessee", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA4", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "RJ may replace financial restitution, but Tennessee guarantees no nonfiling, dismissal, sealing, expungement, or comparable case benefit upon successful RJ completion. LA4 is 0.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0944" ] }, { "stateCode": "TN", "stateName": "Tennessee", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA1", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "The completed state-government search found no responsible state actor with a qualifying youth-RJ administrative role; the statewide youth-court network is private.", "confidence": "High for Legal; Medium-High for bounded Governance absence", "sourceIds": [ "src-0945", "src-0946" ] }, { "stateCode": "TN", "stateName": "Tennessee", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "No formal public state–local body substantively dedicated to youth restorative justice was located.", "confidence": "Medium — The private youth-court network does not satisfy the public-body requirement.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0949", "src-0950", "src-0951" ] }, { "stateCode": "TN", "stateName": "Tennessee", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA3", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "No qualifying state-government implementation support was found.", "confidence": "High for Legal; Medium-High for bounded Governance absence", "sourceIds": [ "src-0945", "src-0946" ] }, { "stateCode": "TN", "stateName": "Tennessee", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA4", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "No recurring relevant state monitoring was found.", "confidence": "High for Legal; Medium-High for bounded Governance absence", "sourceIds": [ "src-0945", "src-0946" ] }, { "stateCode": "TN", "stateName": "Tennessee", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Tennessee's FY2025–26 state-appropriation Victim Offender Reconciliation Program grant process funds a separately identified restorative mechanism and expressly permits juvenile referrals. Because the grant is not youth-only and its juvenile share is inseparable, it fits tier 2 rather than tier 3.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0952" ] }, { "stateCode": "TN", "stateName": "Tennessee", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "The annual state-appropriation VORP grant process is a dedicated recurring restorative funding mechanism with current and historical application cycles, supporting F2=3. No final current grantee-by-jurisdiction roster was located, so F3 remains M.", "confidence": "Medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0952" ] }, { "stateCode": "TN", "stateName": "Tennessee", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F3", "status": "unknown", "statusLabel": "Unknown", "scoreDisplay": "M", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "The annual state-appropriation VORP grant process is a dedicated recurring restorative funding mechanism with current and historical application cycles, supporting F2=3. No final current grantee-by-jurisdiction roster was located, so F3 remains M.", "confidence": "Medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0952" ] }, { "stateCode": "TN", "stateName": "Tennessee", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "$1.33", "scoreNumeric": 1.33, "reasoning": "FY2025 Title II allocation $974,370 ÷ 730,411 eligible residents ages 10–17 (age 10 fallback because no general statutory minimum was identified) = $1.33 per eligible youth. Full precision is retained for scoring.", "confidence": "High — official FY2025 allocation table, verified jurisdiction ages, and 2024 Census single-year-age estimates.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0016", "src-0953", "src-0954" ] }, { "stateCode": "TN", "stateName": "Tennessee", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "7%", "scoreNumeric": 0.07, "reasoning": "7 / 95 = 7.37%", "confidence": "medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0955", "src-0956", "src-0957", "src-0958", "src-0959" ] }, { "stateCode": "TN", "stateName": "Tennessee", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "32%", "scoreNumeric": 0.32, "reasoning": "Eligible-age population in verified R1 operating-location counties is 231,360 of 730,411 statewide residents ages 10–17, or 31.68%. Provider locations counted: Blount County, Crockett County, Davidson County, Hamilton County, Madison County, Marshall County, Shelby County. Claimed service areas were not substituted for physical operating locations.", "confidence": "High for the population calculation; provider-location completeness inherits the R1 evidence limits and is a conservative verified floor.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0955", "src-0956", "src-0957", "src-0958", "src-0959", "src-0960", "src-0961" ] }, { "stateCode": "TN", "stateName": "Tennessee", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "The current association page identifies seven named active youth-court coordinators, while Memphis-Shelby operates a distinct restorative conference/mediation route.", "confidence": "medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0955", "src-0956", "src-0957", "src-0958", "src-0959" ] }, { "stateCode": "TN", "stateName": "Tennessee", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "Memphis-Shelby SHAPE accepts school and law-enforcement referrals instead of juvenile petitions and uses conferences, restitution, community service, and victim resolution.", "confidence": "medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0955", "src-0956", "src-0957", "src-0958", "src-0959" ] }, { "stateCode": "TX", "stateName": "Texas", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB1", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "The completed current-law search found no enacted statewide Texas youth-RJ mechanism. Generic juvenile diversion and dispute resolution do not describe the required restorative process, while the express youth-RJ bills identified were not enacted. LB1 is 0.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0962", "src-0963" ] }, { "stateCode": "TX", "stateName": "Texas", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Texas's completed current enacted-law search found no qualifying youth-specific restorative-justice recognition. LB2's live scale has no X outcome, so the correct classification is Verified absence/0. Because LB2=0, LB3, LB4, and LA1-LA4 remain Structural N/A/X under the live gateway.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0962" ] }, { "stateCode": "TX", "stateName": "Texas", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB3", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Texas's LB1 gateway is 0, so duration cannot be assessed for a nonexistent statewide youth-RJ authority. LB3 is Structural N/A/X.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0962" ] }, { "stateCode": "TX", "stateName": "Texas", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB4", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Texas's LB1 gateway is 0, so referral-directive strength for a statewide youth-RJ mechanism cannot be evaluated. LB4 is Structural N/A/X.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0962" ] }, { "stateCode": "TX", "stateName": "Texas", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA1", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "The live LB2 gateway is not satisfied.", "confidence": "High for Legal gateway; Medium-High for Governance", "sourceIds": [ "src-0964", "src-0965" ] }, { "stateCode": "TX", "stateName": "Texas", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA2", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "The live LB2 gateway is not satisfied.", "confidence": "High for Legal gateway; Medium-High for Governance", "sourceIds": [ "src-0964", "src-0965" ] }, { "stateCode": "TX", "stateName": "Texas", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "TDCJ administers a statewide victim-initiated Victim Offender Mediation Dialogue program under Code of Criminal Procedure art. 56A.602 for offenders in custody or on parole/mandatory supervision; the process requires responsibility and centers the harm to the victim.", "confidence": "High — direct statewide authority/program review under the revised LA3 rule.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0966" ] }, { "stateCode": "TX", "stateName": "Texas", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA4", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Texas has no qualifying statewide youth-RJ pathway to which a completion benefit could attach. LA4 is Structural N/A/X.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0962" ] }, { "stateCode": "TX", "stateName": "Texas", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA1", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "No state actor with an explicit qualifying youth-RJ administrative role was found.", "confidence": "High for Legal gateway; Medium-High for Governance", "sourceIds": [ "src-0964", "src-0965" ] }, { "stateCode": "TX", "stateName": "Texas", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "No formal public state–local body substantively dedicated to youth restorative justice was located.", "confidence": "Medium — Local county programs do not form a statewide public body.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0967", "src-0968", "src-0969" ] }, { "stateCode": "TX", "stateName": "Texas", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA3", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "State grant materials are generic diversion support and do not supply youth-RJ-specific implementation assistance.", "confidence": "High for Legal gateway; Medium-High for Governance", "sourceIds": [ "src-0964", "src-0965" ] }, { "stateCode": "TX", "stateName": "Texas", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA4", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "No recurring public statewide monitoring of a qualifying restorative component was verified.", "confidence": "High for Legal gateway; Medium-High for Governance", "sourceIds": [ "src-0964", "src-0965" ] }, { "stateCode": "TX", "stateName": "Texas", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F1", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "The identified FY2027 youth-diversion opportunity begins after the scoring period, while in-period restorative-practices funding is for school training and is excluded. The completed FY2025–26 TJJD budget, grant, award, procurement, and restorative-process search found no qualifying state-origin youth-RJ award.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0970", "src-0971" ] }, { "stateCode": "TX", "stateName": "Texas", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Revised F1 is Verified absence / 0 after the completed state-origin funding search. Under the live dependency rule, F2 is Structural N/A / X; excluded federal, school-only, local-only, generic-diversion, proposed, or out-of-period funding is not reused.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0970", "src-0971" ] }, { "stateCode": "TX", "stateName": "Texas", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F3", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Revised F1 is Verified absence / 0 after the completed state-origin funding search. Under the live dependency rule, F3 is Structural N/A / X; excluded federal, school-only, local-only, generic-diversion, proposed, or out-of-period funding is not reused.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0970", "src-0971" ] }, { "stateCode": "TX", "stateName": "Texas", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "$0.00", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "FY2025 Title II allocation $0 ÷ 3,102,973 eligible residents ages 10–16 (statutory minimum age 10) = $0.00 per eligible youth. Full precision is retained for scoring. The $0 value follows the controlling FY2025 table and denotes nonparticipation for this allocation, not absence of every possible federal funding source.", "confidence": "High — official FY2025 allocation table, verified jurisdiction ages, and 2024 Census single-year-age estimates.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0016", "src-0972", "src-0973", "src-0180" ] }, { "stateCode": "TX", "stateName": "Texas", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1%", "scoreNumeric": 0.01, "reasoning": "3 / 254 = 1.18%", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0974", "src-0975", "src-0976", "src-0977" ] }, { "stateCode": "TX", "stateName": "Texas", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "28%", "scoreNumeric": 0.28, "reasoning": "Eligible-age population in verified R1 operating-location counties is 866,020 of 3,102,973 statewide residents ages 10–16, or 27.91%. Provider locations counted: Dallas County, Harris County, Travis County. Claimed service areas were not substituted for physical operating locations.", "confidence": "High for the population calculation; provider-location completeness inherits the R1 evidence limits and is a conservative verified floor.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0974", "src-0975", "src-0976", "src-0977", "src-0978", "src-0979" ] }, { "stateCode": "TX", "stateName": "Texas", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Current county and school sources independently establish neighborhood/restorative conferencing and formal school restorative-circle/conference approaches across multiple jurisdictions.", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0974", "src-0975", "src-0976", "src-0977" ] }, { "stateCode": "TX", "stateName": "Texas", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "Dallas currently places restorative circles and conferences within its formal discipline-response structure for student-code violations.", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0974", "src-0975", "src-0976", "src-0977" ] }, { "stateCode": "UT", "stateName": "Utah", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Utah expressly authorizes a juvenile court to refer an adjudicated minor's case to a restorative-justice program, such as victim-offender mediation, with participant agreement. LB1 is 1.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0980", "src-0981" ] }, { "stateCode": "UT", "stateName": "Utah", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Utah places named restorative processes in both adjudicated-case restitution and prepetition nonjudicial adjustment, with participant consent and agreed repair terms. The significant youth focus earns 2.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0980", "src-0981" ] }, { "stateCode": "UT", "stateName": "Utah", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "The juvenile RJ and mediation provisions are permanent codified law with no pilot term or sunset. Utah earns 2.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0980", "src-0981" ] }, { "stateCode": "UT", "stateName": "Utah", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "The juvenile court may refer a case to RJ, and nonjudicial adjustment may include victim-offender mediation. Neither provision requires case-level consideration, preference, or an offer, so LB4 is 0.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0980", "src-0981" ] }, { "stateCode": "UT", "stateName": "Utah", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "4", "scoreNumeric": 4, "reasoning": "Section 80-6-710 permits individualized referral of an adjudicated minor's case with participant agreement and no broad offense exclusion.", "confidence": "High for Legal/GA1/GA3; Medium for GA4", "sourceIds": [ "src-0982", "src-0983", "src-0984" ] }, { "stateCode": "UT", "stateName": "Utah", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "The completed controlling-law search found no meaningful statewide prior-contact rule; general case language does not convert statutory silence into maximum access.", "confidence": "High for Legal/GA1/GA3; Medium for GA4", "sourceIds": [ "src-0982", "src-0983", "src-0984" ] }, { "stateCode": "UT", "stateName": "Utah", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "The Utah Department of Corrections created and currently offers a Victim/Offender Dialogue Program; Utah Courts also describe trained ADR facilitators for victim-offender mediation, conferencing, and circles focused on responsibility and repair.", "confidence": "High — direct statewide authority/program review under the revised LA3 rule.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0985", "src-0986" ] }, { "stateCode": "UT", "stateName": "Utah", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "4", "scoreNumeric": 4, "reasoning": "A Utah nonjudicial adjustment may require victim-offender mediation, and substantial compliance bars petition filing. For qualifying records consisting solely of successfully completed nonjudicial adjustments, § 80-6-1004.5 requires the juvenile court, without a petition, to order expungement once the individual reaches age 18. The automatic completion-linked record relief earns 4.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-0987", "src-0988", "src-0989" ] }, { "stateCode": "UT", "stateName": "Utah", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Utah State Courts administer restorative dialogue and support juvenile restorative processes through the existing ADR structure.", "confidence": "High for Legal/GA1/GA3; Medium for GA4", "sourceIds": [ "src-0982", "src-0983", "src-0984" ] }, { "stateCode": "UT", "stateName": "Utah", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "The statutorily grounded youth-court association and advisory structure links the state with more than 20 member courts across Utah.", "confidence": "High — Some governance records are maintained by the association rather than the Judiciary.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0990", "src-0991", "src-0992" ] }, { "stateCode": "UT", "stateName": "Utah", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "Courts and statewide youth-court infrastructure provide training, practice materials, and substantial implementation support.", "confidence": "High for Legal/GA1/GA3; Medium for GA4", "sourceIds": [ "src-0982", "src-0983", "src-0984" ] }, { "stateCode": "UT", "stateName": "Utah", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Recurring statewide reporting identifies restorative-capable juvenile programming in aggregate but does not consistently isolate provider-level restorative outcomes.", "confidence": "High for Legal/GA1/GA3; Medium for GA4", "sourceIds": [ "src-0982", "src-0983", "src-0984" ] }, { "stateCode": "UT", "stateName": "Utah", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Utah's state court and juvenile-justice systems currently administer identifiable restorative dialogue, conferencing, circles, and youth-court infrastructure for justice-involved minors. These activities are supported within broader state court and juvenile-justice operations, but no separately identified restorative award, contract, reimbursement line, or operating allocation was located. The inseparable restorative component therefore supports tier 1.", "confidence": "Medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0982", "src-0993", "src-0994" ] }, { "stateCode": "UT", "stateName": "Utah", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F2", "status": "unknown", "statusLabel": "Unknown", "scoreDisplay": "M", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Revised F1 rests on an identifiable restorative component inside broader state court and juvenile-justice operations. The current materials do not isolate a provider-award recurrence history or the local units receiving the same qualifying state funding, so both dependent indicators remain M.", "confidence": "Medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0982", "src-0993", "src-0994" ] }, { "stateCode": "UT", "stateName": "Utah", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F3", "status": "unknown", "statusLabel": "Unknown", "scoreDisplay": "M", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Revised F1 rests on an identifiable restorative component inside broader state court and juvenile-justice operations. The current materials do not isolate a provider-award recurrence history or the local units receiving the same qualifying state funding, so both dependent indicators remain M.", "confidence": "Medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-0982", "src-0993", "src-0994" ] }, { "stateCode": "UT", "stateName": "Utah", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "$1.97", "scoreNumeric": 1.97, "reasoning": "FY2025 Title II allocation $674,378 ÷ 341,785 eligible residents ages 12–17 (statutory minimum age 12) = $1.97 per eligible youth. Full precision is retained for scoring.", "confidence": "High — official FY2025 allocation table, verified jurisdiction ages, and 2024 Census single-year-age estimates.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0016", "src-0995", "src-0996" ] }, { "stateCode": "UT", "stateName": "Utah", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "38%", "scoreNumeric": 0.38, "reasoning": "11 / 29 = 37.93%", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0997", "src-0998", "src-0999", "src-1000", "src-1001" ] }, { "stateCode": "UT", "stateName": "Utah", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "83%", "scoreNumeric": 0.83, "reasoning": "Eligible-age population in verified R1 operating-location counties is 282,009 of 341,785 statewide residents ages 12–17, or 82.51%. Provider locations counted: Box Elder County, Davis County, Juab County, Millard County, Salt Lake County, Sanpete County, Sevier County, Tooele County, Utah County, Wasatch County, Weber County. Claimed service areas were not substituted for physical operating locations.", "confidence": "High for the population calculation; provider-location completeness inherits the R1 evidence limits and is a conservative verified floor.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0997", "src-0998", "src-0999", "src-1000", "src-1001", "src-1002", "src-1003" ] }, { "stateCode": "UT", "stateName": "Utah", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "The current member directory verifies many independently operated courts, but they all use the same youth/peer-court functional approach.", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0997", "src-0998", "src-0999", "src-1000", "src-1001" ] }, { "stateCode": "UT", "stateName": "Utah", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "Current state education guidance and Box Elder policy establish youth/peer court as a school-based alternative to court referral for school offenses.", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-0997", "src-0998", "src-0999", "src-1000", "src-1001" ] }, { "stateCode": "VT", "stateName": "Vermont", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Vermont requires a juvenile diversion program using youth-appropriate community-based restorative-justice providers for pre- and post-charge referrals. LB1 is 1.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-1004", "src-1005", "src-1006" ] }, { "stateCode": "VT", "stateName": "Vermont", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "A dedicated subchapter provides detailed youth-RJ purpose, statewide administration, referrals, local policy requirements, rights, confidentiality, outcome reporting, and record relief. The significant youth focus earns 2.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-1004", "src-1005" ] }, { "stateCode": "VT", "stateName": "Vermont", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "The juvenile diversion framework is permanent codified law effective July 1, 2025, with no pilot term or sunset. Vermont earns 2.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-1004", "src-1005" ] }, { "stateCode": "VT", "stateName": "Vermont", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "For a qualifying misdemeanor, the prosecutor must provide the child or youth an opportunity to participate unless the prosecutor states on the record why referral would not serve the ends of justice. This presumptive required offer earns 3.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-1004" ] }, { "stateCode": "VT", "stateName": "Vermont", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "4", "scoreNumeric": 4, "reasoning": "Any offense may enter pre-charge diversion, and prosecutors may approve additional post-charge offenses individually.", "confidence": "High — current primary legal evidence directly supports this tier.", "sourceIds": [ "src-1007", "src-1008", "src-1009", "src-1010" ] }, { "stateCode": "VT", "stateName": "Vermont", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "4", "scoreNumeric": 4, "reasoning": "Prior record is a discretionary factor rather than a statewide automatic bar.", "confidence": "High — current primary legal evidence directly supports this tier.", "sourceIds": [ "src-1007", "src-1008", "src-1009", "src-1010" ] }, { "stateCode": "VT", "stateName": "Vermont", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "3 V.S.A. §164 requires the Attorney General to administer an adult court-diversion program statewide; participation may use restorative processes and is available to adult referrals before or after charge.", "confidence": "High — direct statewide authority/program review under the revised LA3 rule.", "sourceIds": [ "src-1011" ] }, { "stateCode": "VT", "stateName": "Vermont", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "4", "scoreNumeric": 4, "reasoning": "Successful pre-charge diversion triggers automatic deletion after the statutory waiting period, and qualifying successful post-charge diversion triggers court expungement. The legally automatic completion-linked record relief earns 4.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-1004" ] }, { "stateCode": "VT", "stateName": "Vermont", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "The Attorney General operates a dedicated Community Justice Unit.", "confidence": "High — current primary state evidence directly supports this tier.", "sourceIds": [ "src-1007", "src-1008", "src-1009", "src-1010" ] }, { "stateCode": "VT", "stateName": "Vermont", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "State advisory and provider structures formally connect agencies, county-serving programs, local practitioners, and youth stakeholders statewide.", "confidence": "High — The provider association is not itself a state body, but it operates within a statutory state-administered network.", "sourceIds": [ "src-1012", "src-1013", "src-1014" ] }, { "stateCode": "VT", "stateName": "Vermont", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "Uniform policies, provider infrastructure, and statutory training responsibilities establish substantial current implementation support.", "confidence": "High — current primary state evidence directly supports this tier.", "sourceIds": [ "src-1007", "src-1008", "src-1009", "src-1010" ] }, { "stateCode": "VT", "stateName": "Vermont", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "4", "scoreNumeric": 4, "reasoning": "Annual county and outcome reporting includes formal recommendations and corrective planning.", "confidence": "High — current primary state evidence directly supports this tier.", "sourceIds": [ "src-1007", "src-1008", "src-1009", "src-1010" ] }, { "stateCode": "VT", "stateName": "Vermont", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "FY2026 appropriates $4,874,343 to combined court-diversion grants; the restorative youth component is identifiable but inseparable.", "confidence": "Medium — qualifying component is identifiable but its amount is inseparable.", "sourceIds": [ "src-1015", "src-1016", "src-1017", "src-0014" ] }, { "stateCode": "VT", "stateName": "Vermont", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "The annual Attorney General court-diversion grant/contract appropriation is a continuing dedicated mechanism with an explicit youth restorative component.", "confidence": "High — current primary state records support the revised tier.", "sourceIds": [ "src-1018", "src-1016" ] }, { "stateCode": "VT", "stateName": "Vermont", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "Statute requires funded youth-appropriate restorative diversion in each county; the FY2026 appropriation funds all 14 controlling units.", "confidence": "High — current primary state records support the revised tier.", "sourceIds": [ "src-1018", "src-1016" ] }, { "stateCode": "VT", "stateName": "Vermont", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "$9.56", "scoreNumeric": 9.56, "reasoning": "FY2025 Title II allocation $488,929 ÷ 51,142 eligible residents ages 12–18 (statutory minimum age 12) = $9.56 per eligible youth. Full precision is retained for scoring.", "confidence": "High — official FY2025 allocation table, verified jurisdiction ages, and 2024 Census single-year-age estimates.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0016", "src-1019", "src-1020" ] }, { "stateCode": "VT", "stateName": "Vermont", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "86%", "scoreNumeric": 0.86, "reasoning": "Physical program offices are listed in 12 of 14 counties: 86%; countywide service availability is not substituted for office presence.", "confidence": "High — current primary-source evidence supports the stated numerator and denominator.", "sourceIds": [ "src-1015", "src-1016", "src-1017", "src-0014" ] }, { "stateCode": "VT", "stateName": "Vermont", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "98%", "scoreNumeric": 0.98, "reasoning": "Eligible-age population in verified R1 operating-location counties is 50,185 of 51,142 statewide residents ages 12–18, or 98.13%. Provider locations counted: Addison County, Bennington County, Caledonia County, Chittenden County, Franklin County, Lamoille County, Orange County, Orleans County, Rutland County, Washington County, Windham County, Windsor County. Claimed service areas were not substituted for physical operating locations.", "confidence": "High for the population calculation; provider-location completeness inherits the R1 evidence limits and is a conservative verified floor.", "sourceIds": [ "src-1015", "src-1016", "src-1017", "src-0014", "src-1021", "src-1022" ] }, { "stateCode": "VT", "stateName": "Vermont", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "One qualifying functional approach family—Court Diversion's restorative process—is verified.", "confidence": "Medium — current provider evidence supports the functional classification.", "sourceIds": [ "src-1015", "src-1016", "src-1017", "src-0014" ] }, { "stateCode": "VT", "stateName": "Vermont", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Bennington's continuum establishes current school early-intervention and conflict mediation, but not a formal diversion substitute.", "confidence": "Medium — current provider evidence supports the functional classification.", "sourceIds": [ "src-1015", "src-1016", "src-1017", "src-0014" ] }, { "stateCode": "VA", "stateName": "Virginia", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Virginia authorizes local youth justice diversion programs whose peer-driven sentences require youth accountability, restitution, and fair, constructive, restorative outcomes. LB1 is 1.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-1023", "src-1024" ] }, { "stateCode": "VA", "stateName": "Virginia", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "A dedicated juvenile statute details program structure, approval, advisory committees, eligibility, peer trials, restorative goals, confidentiality, and fees. The significant youth focus earns 2.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-1023", "src-1024" ] }, { "stateCode": "VA", "stateName": "Virginia", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "The youth justice diversion authority is permanent codified law with no pilot term or sunset. Virginia earns 2.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-1023" ] }, { "stateCode": "VA", "stateName": "Virginia", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "A jurisdiction may establish a program and an intake officer may refer a youth based on community resources and case circumstances. The law imposes no RJ-specific duty to consider, prefer, or offer referral, so LB4 is 0.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-1023", "src-1024" ] }, { "stateCode": "VA", "stateName": "Virginia", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "State law authorizes selected felony and Class 1 misdemeanor referrals while requiring petition filing for broad violent-felony categories.", "confidence": "High for Legal; Medium for Governance minimum tiers", "sourceIds": [ "src-1025", "src-1026", "src-1027", "src-1028" ] }, { "stateCode": "VA", "stateName": "Virginia", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "Only specified formal serious history—a prior felony adjudication paired with a new felony complaint—automatically excludes the broader referral route.", "confidence": "High for Legal; Medium for Governance minimum tiers", "sourceIds": [ "src-1025", "src-1026", "src-1027", "src-1028" ] }, { "stateCode": "VA", "stateName": "Virginia", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Virginia DOC currently operates a statewide victim-initiated Victim-Offender Dialogue process for incarcerated adults, with extensive preparation and a facilitated meeting focused on harm and offender responsibility.", "confidence": "High — direct statewide authority/program review under the revised LA3 rule.", "sourceIds": [ "src-1029" ] }, { "stateCode": "VA", "stateName": "Virginia", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA4", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Virginia authorizes informal nonfiling and protects program records, but it does not expressly guarantee dismissal, nonfiling, sealing, or expungement upon successful youth justice diversion completion. LA4 is 0.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-1030", "src-1031" ] }, { "stateCode": "VA", "stateName": "Virginia", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "DCJS administers the broader statewide youth-diversion grant system containing a verified state-supported restorative program.", "confidence": "High for Legal; Medium for Governance minimum tiers", "sourceIds": [ "src-1025", "src-1026", "src-1027", "src-1028" ] }, { "stateCode": "VA", "stateName": "Virginia", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "No formal statewide public state–local body substantively dedicated to youth restorative justice was located.", "confidence": "Medium — Local advisory committees authorized by law do not form one statewide coordinating body.", "sourceIds": [ "src-1032", "src-1033", "src-1034" ] }, { "stateCode": "VA", "stateName": "Virginia", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Current statute and DCJS grant materials provide basic implementation references, while restorative-specific recurring technical assistance was not verified.", "confidence": "High for Legal; Medium for Governance minimum tiers", "sourceIds": [ "src-1025", "src-1026", "src-1027", "src-1028" ] }, { "stateCode": "VA", "stateName": "Virginia", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Recurring state grant monitoring covers the broader diversion system containing an identifiable restorative component, but restorative participation/outcomes are not separately reported.", "confidence": "High for Legal; Medium for Governance minimum tiers", "sourceIds": [ "src-1025", "src-1026", "src-1027", "src-1028" ] }, { "stateCode": "VA", "stateName": "Virginia", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Virginia DJJ's current Regional Service Coordination array defines restorative justice as a billable per-case youth service, and the state is directly contracting with approved providers under the active model. A separately identified restorative reimbursement/service category satisfies tier 2, even though final payment totals and provider-level amounts are not published.", "confidence": "Medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-1035", "src-1036", "src-1037" ] }, { "stateCode": "VA", "stateName": "Virginia", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "DJJ has maintained Regional Service Coordination and annual service arrays for years, and the active model separately defines billable restorative justice services. This dedicated recurring reimbursement/contract mechanism supports F2=3. The final active restorative-provider contract roster and funded jurisdictions are not public, so F3 remains M.", "confidence": "Medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-1035", "src-1036", "src-1037" ] }, { "stateCode": "VA", "stateName": "Virginia", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F3", "status": "unknown", "statusLabel": "Unknown", "scoreDisplay": "M", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "DJJ has maintained Regional Service Coordination and annual service arrays for years, and the active model separately defines billable restorative justice services. This dedicated recurring reimbursement/contract mechanism supports F2=3. The final active restorative-provider contract roster and funded jurisdictions are not public, so F3 remains M.", "confidence": "Medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-1035", "src-1036", "src-1037" ] }, { "stateCode": "VA", "stateName": "Virginia", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "$0.88", "scoreNumeric": 0.88, "reasoning": "FY2025 Title II allocation $677,555 ÷ 768,466 eligible residents ages 11–17 (statutory minimum age 11) = $0.88 per eligible youth. Full precision is retained for scoring.", "confidence": "High — official FY2025 allocation table, verified jurisdiction ages, and 2024 Census single-year-age estimates.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0016", "src-1038", "src-1039" ] }, { "stateCode": "VA", "stateName": "Virginia", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3%", "scoreNumeric": 0.03, "reasoning": "4 / 133 = 3.01%", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-1040", "src-1041", "src-1042", "src-1043", "src-1044", "src-1045" ] }, { "stateCode": "VA", "stateName": "Virginia", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "18%", "scoreNumeric": 0.18, "reasoning": "Eligible-age population in verified R1 operating-location counties is 138,735 of 768,466 statewide residents ages 11–17, or 18.05%. Provider locations counted: Arlington County, Fairfax County, Richmond County, Richmond city. Claimed service areas were not substituted for physical operating locations.", "confidence": "High for the population calculation; provider-location completeness inherits the R1 evidence limits and is a conservative verified floor.", "sourceIds": [ "src-1040", "src-1041", "src-1042", "src-1043", "src-1044", "src-1045", "src-1046", "src-1047" ] }, { "stateCode": "VA", "stateName": "Virginia", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "Current local providers independently operate restorative conferencing, circle/mediation, and youth-diversion approaches across multiple jurisdictions.", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-1040", "src-1041", "src-1042", "src-1043", "src-1044", "src-1045" ] }, { "stateCode": "VA", "stateName": "Virginia", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "Fairfax currently authorizes restorative conferences in lieu of discipline and coordinates restorative/alternative accountability with police to avoid arrest.", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-1040", "src-1041", "src-1042", "src-1043", "src-1044", "src-1045" ] }, { "stateCode": "WA", "stateName": "Washington", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Washington expressly defines restorative justice and authorizes prosecutors, probation counselors, and diversion units to refer juveniles to RJ or victim-offender reconciliation programs. LB1 is 1.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-1048", "src-1049", "src-1050" ] }, { "stateCode": "WA", "stateName": "Washington", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "RJ is defined in detail and integrated across juvenile screening, diversion agreements, services, counseling sessions, and post-adjudication community rehabilitation. The significant youth focus earns 2.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-1048", "src-1049", "src-1050" ] }, { "stateCode": "WA", "stateName": "Washington", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Washington's juvenile RJ authority is permanent codified law with no pilot term or sunset. Washington earns 2.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-1048", "src-1049", "src-1050" ] }, { "stateCode": "WA", "stateName": "Washington", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Authorized decision-makers may refer a juvenile to RJ, but no provision requires RJ-specific consideration, preference, or an offer. LB4 is 0.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-1051", "src-1052" ] }, { "stateCode": "WA", "stateName": "Washington", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "Second-degree assault and robbery remain diversion-eligible, while most violent and sex offenses must be filed.", "confidence": "High — current primary legal evidence directly supports this tier.", "sourceIds": [ "src-1053", "src-1054", "src-1055", "src-1056" ] }, { "stateCode": "WA", "stateName": "Washington", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "4", "scoreNumeric": 4, "reasoning": "History length, seriousness, and recency are individualized considerations, not automatic statewide exclusions.", "confidence": "High — current primary legal evidence directly supports this tier.", "sourceIds": [ "src-1053", "src-1054", "src-1055", "src-1056" ] }, { "stateCode": "WA", "stateName": "Washington", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Washington DOC currently offers a statewide, victim-initiated Victim-Offender Dialogue under binding Policy 390.350. The incarcerated person must accept responsibility, and the process addresses the crime’s harm without changing legal or custody status.", "confidence": "High — direct statewide authority/program review under the revised LA3 rule.", "sourceIds": [ "src-1057", "src-1058" ] }, { "stateCode": "WA", "stateName": "Washington", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "When RJ is used within a diversion agreement, the juvenile fulfills conditions in lieu of prosecution, and only violation authorizes filing. Successful completion therefore guarantees the nonfiling benefit, earning 2.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-1059", "src-1049" ] }, { "stateCode": "WA", "stateName": "Washington", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "PCJJ and DCYF have an explicit restorative role within broader state youth-justice administration.", "confidence": "High — current primary state evidence directly supports this tier.", "sourceIds": [ "src-1053", "src-1054", "src-1055", "src-1056" ] }, { "stateCode": "WA", "stateName": "Washington", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "The Partnership Council on Juvenile Justice links state and local stakeholders and substantively supports youth restorative diversion.", "confidence": "Medium — A recent meeting record with geographically diverse RJ-specific participation was not fully verified for tier 3.", "sourceIds": [ "src-1060", "src-1061", "src-1062" ] }, { "stateCode": "WA", "stateName": "Washington", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Current statewide reports provide useful models and implementation references but do not establish recurring training or technical assistance.", "confidence": "High — current primary state evidence directly supports this tier.", "sourceIds": [ "src-1053", "src-1054", "src-1055", "src-1056" ] }, { "stateCode": "WA", "stateName": "Washington", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "The 2024 biennial and 2025 statewide reports provide named-provider, participation, outcome, and jurisdiction-level evidence.", "confidence": "High — current primary state evidence directly supports this tier.", "sourceIds": [ "src-1053", "src-1054", "src-1055", "src-1056" ] }, { "stateCode": "WA", "stateName": "Washington", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "State juvenile-court community-program funding supports a broader diversion system; restorative models are identifiable but their share is inseparable.", "confidence": "Medium — qualifying component is identifiable but its amount is inseparable.", "sourceIds": [ "src-1063", "src-1064", "src-1055", "src-0014" ] }, { "stateCode": "WA", "stateName": "Washington", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "The enacted FY2026 and FY2027 budget makes equal $2,841,000 state appropriations for county juvenile-court grants; recurrence is tier 3.", "confidence": "High — current primary state records support the revised tier.", "sourceIds": [ "src-1065", "src-1064" ] }, { "stateCode": "WA", "stateName": "Washington", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F3", "status": "unknown", "statusLabel": "Unknown", "scoreDisplay": "M", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "The application-based grant program lacks a final county-grantee roster crosswalked to a qualifying restorative component; eligibility or local funding cannot substitute.", "confidence": "Low — no final funded-jurisdiction roster for the qualifying mechanism was verified.", "sourceIds": [ "src-1065", "src-1064" ] }, { "stateCode": "WA", "stateName": "Washington", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "$1.04", "scoreNumeric": 1.04, "reasoning": "FY2025 Title II allocation $998,528 ÷ 960,295 eligible residents ages 8–17 (statutory minimum age 8) = $1.04 per eligible youth. Full precision is retained for scoring.", "confidence": "High — official FY2025 allocation table, verified jurisdiction ages, and 2024 Census single-year-age estimates.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0016", "src-1066", "src-1067" ] }, { "stateCode": "WA", "stateName": "Washington", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "38%", "scoreNumeric": 0.38, "reasoning": "15 of 39 county-equivalents contain at least one verified current youth-RJ operating location (38.46%; entered as 38%). Each county was searched using its official juvenile-court, prosecutor, diversion, accountability-board, peer-court, or restorative-justice pages, supplemented by the Washington Courts 2025 statewide youth-diversion report. Generic diversion, restitution, counseling, community service, an inactive/cut program, or a program located in another county did not qualify without direct evidence of a restorative process involving harm, affected parties or community dialogue. The result is a verified 15-county floor, not an inference that every statutory diversion unit is restorative.", "confidence": "High for the 15-count floor; conservative for generic diversion programs that did not independently establish a qualifying restorative process", "sourceIds": [ "src-1068", "src-1069", "src-1070", "src-1071", "src-1072", "src-1073", "src-1074", "src-1075", "src-1076", "src-1077", "src-1078", "src-1079", "src-1080", "src-1081", "src-1082", "src-1083", "src-1084", "src-1085", "src-1086", "src-1087", "src-1088" ] }, { "stateCode": "WA", "stateName": "Washington", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "75%", "scoreNumeric": 0.75, "reasoning": "Eligible-age population in verified R1 operating-location counties is 720,141 of 960,295 statewide residents ages 8–17, or 74.99%. Provider locations counted: Clallam County, Clark County, Cowlitz County, King County, Kitsap County, Kittitas County, Pend Oreille County, Pierce County, San Juan County, Skamania County, Snohomish County, Stevens County, Thurston County, Whatcom County, Yakima County. Claimed service areas were not substituted for physical operating locations.", "confidence": "High for the population calculation; provider-location completeness inherits the R1 evidence limits and is a conservative verified floor.", "sourceIds": [ "src-1068", "src-1069", "src-1070", "src-1071", "src-1072", "src-1073", "src-1074", "src-1075", "src-1076", "src-1077", "src-1078", "src-1079", "src-1080", "src-1081", "src-1082", "src-1083", "src-1084", "src-1085", "src-1086", "src-1087", "src-1088", "src-1089", "src-1090" ] }, { "stateCode": "WA", "stateName": "Washington", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "One strict-qualifying current approach is verified: community restorative diversion through Our Sisters' House.", "confidence": "Medium — current provider evidence supports the functional classification.", "sourceIds": [ "src-1063", "src-1064", "src-1055", "src-0014" ] }, { "stateCode": "WA", "stateName": "Washington", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Spokane Public Schools' RISE is an operational school-based diversion with restorative interventions and agreements.", "confidence": "Medium — current provider evidence supports the functional classification.", "sourceIds": [ "src-1063", "src-1064", "src-1055", "src-0014" ] }, { "stateCode": "WV", "stateName": "West Virginia", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "West Virginia expressly authorizes courts and prosecutors to offer juveniles a voluntary restorative-justice program before disposition. LB1 is 1.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-1091" ] }, { "stateCode": "WV", "stateName": "West Virginia", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "A dedicated youth-specific section regulates referral timing, offenses, voluntariness, victim-youth agreements, community repair, dismissal, and use immunity. The significant youth focus earns 2.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-1091" ] }, { "stateCode": "WV", "stateName": "West Virginia", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "The juvenile RJ framework is permanent codified law with no pilot term or sunset. West Virginia earns 2.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-1091" ] }, { "stateCode": "WV", "stateName": "West Virginia", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "The court or prosecutor may offer RJ before disposition, but no provision requires consideration, preference, or an offer. LB4 is 0.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-1091" ] }, { "stateCode": "WV", "stateName": "West Virginia", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "State law expressly includes status and nonviolent offenses plus selected person offenses—misdemeanor assault and battery.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-1092", "src-1093", "src-1094" ] }, { "stateCode": "WV", "stateName": "West Virginia", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "4", "scoreNumeric": 4, "reasoning": "The law expressly preserves participation in a current or subsequent proceeding after an initial declination and creates no statewide prior-contact bar.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-1092", "src-1093", "src-1094" ] }, { "stateCode": "WV", "stateName": "West Virginia", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA3", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "A completed current search found statutory restorative justice for juveniles, but no statewide adult referral pathway. Adult corrections/victim-services materials did not establish VOD or an equivalent qualifying process.", "confidence": "High — direct statewide authority/program review under the revised LA3 rule.", "sourceIds": [ "src-1095", "src-1096" ] }, { "stateCode": "WV", "stateName": "West Virginia", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "If a referred juvenile successfully completes the RJ program and all agreed measures, the petition must be dismissed. Guaranteed dismissal earns 2.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-1091" ] }, { "stateCode": "WV", "stateName": "West Virginia", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "State agencies and the Supreme Court have explicit youth-RJ program/data responsibilities.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-1092", "src-1093", "src-1094" ] }, { "stateCode": "WV", "stateName": "West Virginia", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "No formal public state–local body substantively dedicated to youth restorative justice was located.", "confidence": "Medium — Provider contracts and statewide statutory duties do not create a coordinating body.", "sourceIds": [ "src-1097", "src-1098", "src-1099" ] }, { "stateCode": "WV", "stateName": "West Virginia", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "The state publishes basic juvenile-law and victim-offender mediation implementation materials.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-1092", "src-1093", "src-1094" ] }, { "stateCode": "WV", "stateName": "West Virginia", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "Recurring Youth Services reports publish referrals, completions, funding continuity, and results for juvenile victim-offender mediation.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-1092", "src-1093", "src-1094" ] }, { "stateCode": "WV", "stateName": "West Virginia", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "The West Virginia Department of Human Services' latest completed Youth Services report expressly states that the Bureau for Social Services funded two juvenile Victim-Offender Mediation programs. It defines VOM as restorative justice involving voluntary victim–youth meetings and creative restitution agreements and reports 136 new JVOM referrals in SFY2024. This is dedicated funding for qualifying youth restorative programs, so tier 3 applies.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-1100" ] }, { "stateCode": "WV", "stateName": "West Virginia", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "DoHS Youth Services reporting documents ongoing state funding for juvenile Victim-Offender Mediation across annual reports and separately identifies JVOM and JMP. The dedicated recurring service funding supports F2=3. The funded JMP operated in Ohio, Brooke, and Hancock Counties, establishing multiple funded jurisdictions but not nearly all counties; F3=2.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-1100" ] }, { "stateCode": "WV", "stateName": "West Virginia", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "DoHS Youth Services reporting documents ongoing state funding for juvenile Victim-Offender Mediation across annual reports and separately identifies JVOM and JMP. The dedicated recurring service funding supports F2=3. The funded JMP operated in Ohio, Brooke, and Hancock Counties, establishing multiple funded jurisdictions but not nearly all counties; F3=2.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-1100" ] }, { "stateCode": "WV", "stateName": "West Virginia", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "$3.72", "scoreNumeric": 3.72, "reasoning": "FY2025 Title II allocation $624,207 ÷ 167,894 eligible residents ages 10–17 (age 10 fallback because no general statutory minimum was identified) = $3.72 per eligible youth. Full precision is retained for scoring.", "confidence": "High — official FY2025 allocation table, verified jurisdiction ages, and 2024 Census single-year-age estimates.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0016", "src-1101", "src-1102" ] }, { "stateCode": "WV", "stateName": "West Virginia", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "11%", "scoreNumeric": 0.11, "reasoning": "6 / 55 = 10.91%", "confidence": "medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-1103", "src-1104", "src-1105", "src-1106", "src-1107", "src-1108", "src-1109", "src-1110" ] }, { "stateCode": "WV", "stateName": "West Virginia", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "25%", "scoreNumeric": 0.25, "reasoning": "Eligible-age population in verified R1 operating-location counties is 41,512 of 167,894 statewide residents ages 10–17, or 24.73%. Provider locations counted: Berkeley County, Fayette County, Marion County, Ohio County, Putnam County, Wood County. Claimed service areas were not substituted for physical operating locations.", "confidence": "High for the population calculation; provider-location completeness inherits the R1 evidence limits and is a conservative verified floor.", "sourceIds": [ "src-1103", "src-1104", "src-1105", "src-1106", "src-1107", "src-1108", "src-1109", "src-1110", "src-1111", "src-1112" ] }, { "stateCode": "WV", "stateName": "West Virginia", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "The current operational evidence establishes one victim-offender/juvenile mediation approach family; additional independent functional approaches were not verified.", "confidence": "medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-1103", "src-1104", "src-1105", "src-1106", "src-1107", "src-1108", "src-1109", "src-1110" ] }, { "stateCode": "WV", "stateName": "West Virginia", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R4", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "A completed state education and school-route search found only climate/community-building references, not an operational qualifying school discipline/offense restorative diversion pathway.", "confidence": "medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-1103", "src-1104", "src-1105", "src-1106", "src-1107", "src-1108", "src-1109", "src-1110" ] }, { "stateCode": "WI", "stateName": "Wisconsin", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Wisconsin expressly authorizes juvenile courts to order a delinquent youth to participate in a victim-offender mediation program when the victim agrees. This recognized restorative process satisfies LB1.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-1113", "src-1114" ] }, { "stateCode": "WI", "stateName": "Wisconsin", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "The youth-specific mediation authority is a brief dispositional clause rather than a dedicated statutory framework. Wisconsin earns 1.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-1113" ] }, { "stateCode": "WI", "stateName": "Wisconsin", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "The juvenile victim-offender mediation authority is permanent codified law with no pilot term or sunset. Wisconsin earns 2.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-1113" ] }, { "stateCode": "WI", "stateName": "Wisconsin", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "The court is authorized to select victim-offender mediation as a disposition, but no law requires RJ-specific consideration, preference, or an offer. LB4 is 0.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-1113", "src-1114" ] }, { "stateCode": "WI", "stateName": "Wisconsin", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "4", "scoreNumeric": 4, "reasoning": "The victim-offender mediation disposition applies to a juvenile adjudged delinquent and contains no broad offense-category exclusion.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-1115", "src-1116", "src-1117" ] }, { "stateCode": "WI", "stateName": "Wisconsin", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "The completed controlling-law search found no meaningful statewide prior-contact rule; general applicability to adjudged youth does not itself specify prior-contact infrastructure.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-1115", "src-1116", "src-1117" ] }, { "stateCode": "WI", "stateName": "Wisconsin", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "Wisconsin DOC’s Office of Victim Services and Programs accepts victim-initiated dialogue requests involving adult offenders in custody or under community supervision and refers them to a trained restorative-justice facilitator.", "confidence": "High — direct statewide authority/program review under the revised LA3 rule.", "sourceIds": [ "src-1118" ] }, { "stateCode": "WI", "stateName": "Wisconsin", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA4", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Wisconsin guarantees no dismissal, nonfiling, sealing, expungement, or comparable case benefit upon successful victim-offender mediation completion. LA4 is 0.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-1113", "src-1114" ] }, { "stateCode": "WI", "stateName": "Wisconsin", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "DCF's Bureau of Youth Services explicitly supports a system grounded in balanced and restorative justice.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-1115", "src-1116", "src-1117" ] }, { "stateCode": "WI", "stateName": "Wisconsin", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "No formal public state–local body substantively dedicated to youth restorative justice was located.", "confidence": "Medium — Grant collaborations and county teen courts do not form a statewide governance body.", "sourceIds": [ "src-1119", "src-1120", "src-1121" ] }, { "stateCode": "WI", "stateName": "Wisconsin", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "DCF publishes recurring grant guidance, project summaries, and implementation resources that include restorative practice.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-1115", "src-1116", "src-1117" ] }, { "stateCode": "WI", "stateName": "Wisconsin", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "Recurring innovation-grant summaries and reports provide county project, training, funding, and result detail.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-1115", "src-1116", "src-1117" ] }, { "stateCode": "WI", "stateName": "Wisconsin", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "2", "scoreNumeric": 2, "reasoning": "Wisconsin's current official 2026 Youth Justice Innovation Grant project summaries identify an awarded Kewaunee County continuation project that expressly includes restorative justice in pre-court diversion for youth ages 13–17. The larger grant cycle supports multiple youth-justice models, but this qualifying restorative project is separately identified, supporting tier 2.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-1122", "src-1123" ] }, { "stateCode": "WI", "stateName": "Wisconsin", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F2", "status": "unknown", "statusLabel": "Unknown", "scoreDisplay": "M", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "The current 2026 project summary labels Kewaunee's qualifying youth restorative pre-court diversion project a continuation grant, but it does not establish more than one completed renewal of that same qualifying project or a dedicated recurring RJ fund. F2 remains M. The one separately identified qualifying funded county supports F3=1.", "confidence": "Medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-1122", "src-1123" ] }, { "stateCode": "WI", "stateName": "Wisconsin", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "1", "scoreNumeric": 1, "reasoning": "The current 2026 project summary labels Kewaunee's qualifying youth restorative pre-court diversion project a continuation grant, but it does not establish more than one completed renewal of that same qualifying project or a dedicated recurring RJ fund. F2 remains M. The one separately identified qualifying funded county supports F3=1.", "confidence": "Medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-1122", "src-1123" ] }, { "stateCode": "WI", "stateName": "Wisconsin", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "$1.58", "scoreNumeric": 1.58, "reasoning": "FY2025 Title II allocation $811,488 ÷ 513,096 eligible residents ages 10–16 (statutory minimum age 10) = $1.58 per eligible youth. Full precision is retained for scoring.", "confidence": "High — official FY2025 allocation table, verified jurisdiction ages, and 2024 Census single-year-age estimates.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0016", "src-1124", "src-1125" ] }, { "stateCode": "WI", "stateName": "Wisconsin", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "17%", "scoreNumeric": 0.17, "reasoning": "12 / 72 = 16.67%", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-1126", "src-1127", "src-1128", "src-1129", "src-1130", "src-1131", "src-1132", "src-1133" ] }, { "stateCode": "WI", "stateName": "Wisconsin", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "33%", "scoreNumeric": 0.33, "reasoning": "Eligible-age population in verified R1 operating-location counties is 169,390 of 513,096 statewide residents ages 10–16, or 33.01%. Provider locations counted: Buffalo County, Crawford County, Dane County, Eau Claire County, Grant County, Marquette County, Milwaukee County, Oconto County, Oneida County, Pepin County, Trempealeau County, Washington County. Claimed service areas were not substituted for physical operating locations.", "confidence": "High for the population calculation; provider-location completeness inherits the R1 evidence limits and is a conservative verified floor.", "sourceIds": [ "src-1126", "src-1127", "src-1128", "src-1129", "src-1130", "src-1131", "src-1132", "src-1133", "src-1134", "src-1135" ] }, { "stateCode": "WI", "stateName": "Wisconsin", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "Current sources independently verify teen courts, restorative youth case management, healing/peace circles, and school restorative responses across multiple providers and counties.", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-1126", "src-1127", "src-1128", "src-1129", "src-1130", "src-1131", "src-1132", "src-1133" ] }, { "stateCode": "WI", "stateName": "Wisconsin", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "3", "scoreNumeric": 3, "reasoning": "Oconto Teen Court is currently an explicit alternative to suspension or juvenile court, with peer participation and restorative sanctions; other districts operate formal restorative discipline responses.", "confidence": "high", "sourceIds": [ "src-1126", "src-1127", "src-1128", "src-1129", "src-1130", "src-1131", "src-1132", "src-1133" ] }, { "stateCode": "WY", "stateName": "Wyoming", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB1", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "A completed search of Wyoming's current juvenile code and adjacent statewide materials found no enacted provision expressly recognizing a qualifying RJ process. LB1 is 0.", "confidence": "High — the official-source and synonym search floor found no qualifying current authority.", "sourceIds": [ "src-1136", "src-1137" ] }, { "stateCode": "WY", "stateName": "Wyoming", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Wyoming's completed current enacted-law search found no qualifying youth-specific restorative-justice recognition. LB2's live scale has no X outcome, so the correct classification is Verified absence/0. Because LB2=0, LB3, LB4, and LA1-LA4 remain Structural N/A/X under the live gateway.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-1138", "src-1139" ] }, { "stateCode": "WY", "stateName": "Wyoming", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB3", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Wyoming's LB1 gateway score is 0. Permanence cannot be assessed for a nonexistent statewide legal mechanism, so LB3 is structurally inapplicable.", "confidence": "High — the legal-mechanism gateway is not satisfied.", "sourceIds": [ "src-1138", "src-1139" ] }, { "stateCode": "WY", "stateName": "Wyoming", "category": "Legal Basis", "indicatorId": "LB4", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Wyoming's LB1 gateway score is 0. Mandate strength for a statewide youth RJ mechanism therefore cannot be evaluated, so LB4 is structurally inapplicable.", "confidence": "High — the legal-mechanism gateway is not satisfied.", "sourceIds": [ "src-1138", "src-1139" ] }, { "stateCode": "WY", "stateName": "Wyoming", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA1", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "The live LB2 gateway is not satisfied.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-1140", "src-1141" ] }, { "stateCode": "WY", "stateName": "Wyoming", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA2", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "The live LB2 gateway is not satisfied.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-1140", "src-1141" ] }, { "stateCode": "WY", "stateName": "Wyoming", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA3", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "A completed search of current Wyoming statutes, Department of Corrections programs and policies, victim services, and court resources found no statewide adult referral to a qualifying restorative process. Located references used restorative concepts in treatment or supervision without an affected-party repair process.", "confidence": "Medium-high — direct statewide authority/program review under the revised LA3 rule.", "sourceIds": [ "src-1142", "src-1143" ] }, { "stateCode": "WY", "stateName": "Wyoming", "category": "Legal Accessibility", "indicatorId": "LA4", "status": "structural_na", "statusLabel": "Structural N/A", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Wyoming's LB1 gateway score is 0. Completion benefits for a qualifying statewide RJ mechanism therefore cannot be evaluated, so LA4 is structurally inapplicable.", "confidence": "High — the legal-mechanism gateway is not satisfied.", "sourceIds": [ "src-1138", "src-1139" ] }, { "stateCode": "WY", "stateName": "Wyoming", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA1", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "The completed official-source search found no Wyoming state actor with an explicit qualifying youth-RJ role.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-1140", "src-1141" ] }, { "stateCode": "WY", "stateName": "Wyoming", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Wyoming has a formal statewide juvenile-justice council and local community juvenile services boards, but no current body or workgroup was verified with youth RJ as a substantive coordinating focus. Broad juvenile oversight and incidental restorative language do not qualify.", "confidence": "High — the full official-source and synonym search floor found no qualifying current body.", "sourceIds": [ "src-1144", "src-1145", "src-1146" ] }, { "stateCode": "WY", "stateName": "Wyoming", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA3", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "No current state youth-RJ implementation support was found.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-1140", "src-1141" ] }, { "stateCode": "WY", "stateName": "Wyoming", "category": "Governance and Accountability", "indicatorId": "GA4", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "No recurring relevant state monitoring was found.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-1140", "src-1141" ] }, { "stateCode": "WY", "stateName": "Wyoming", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F1", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "The completed current state budget, juvenile-services, grant, procurement, enacted-law, restorative-process, and secondary-lead search found no state-origin award or operating allocation for a qualifying youth restorative diversion or alternative program. Generic diversion, restitution, treatment, and juvenile oversight were excluded.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-1147", "src-1148" ] }, { "stateCode": "WY", "stateName": "Wyoming", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F2", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Revised F1 is Verified absence / 0 after the completed state-origin funding search. Under the live dependency rule, F2 is Structural N/A / X; excluded federal, school-only, local-only, generic-diversion, proposed, or out-of-period funding is not reused.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-1147", "src-1148" ] }, { "stateCode": "WY", "stateName": "Wyoming", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F3", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "X", "scoreNumeric": null, "reasoning": "Revised F1 is Verified absence / 0 after the completed state-origin funding search. Under the live dependency rule, F3 is Structural N/A / X; excluded federal, school-only, local-only, generic-diversion, proposed, or out-of-period funding is not reused.", "confidence": "High", "sourceIds": [ "src-1147", "src-1148" ] }, { "stateCode": "WY", "stateName": "Wyoming", "category": "Funding", "indicatorId": "F4", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "$0.48", "scoreNumeric": 0.48, "reasoning": "FY2025 Title II allocation $30,000 ÷ 62,327 eligible residents ages 10–17 (age 10 fallback because no general statutory minimum was identified) = $0.48 per eligible youth. Full precision is retained for scoring. The $30,000 SAG allocation is used literally.", "confidence": "High — official FY2025 allocation table, verified jurisdiction ages, and 2024 Census single-year-age estimates.", "sourceIds": [ "src-0016", "src-1149", "src-1150" ] }, { "stateCode": "WY", "stateName": "Wyoming", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R1", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "9%", "scoreNumeric": 0.09, "reasoning": "2 / 23 = 8.70%", "confidence": "medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-1151", "src-1152", "src-1153", "src-1154" ] }, { "stateCode": "WY", "stateName": "Wyoming", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R2", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "7%", "scoreNumeric": 0.07, "reasoning": "Eligible-age population in verified R1 operating-location counties is 4,503 of 62,327 statewide residents ages 10–17, or 7.22%. Provider locations counted: Albany County, Teton County. Claimed service areas were not substituted for physical operating locations.", "confidence": "High for the population calculation; provider-location completeness inherits the R1 evidence limits and is a conservative verified floor.", "sourceIds": [ "src-1151", "src-1152", "src-1153", "src-1154", "src-1155", "src-1156" ] }, { "stateCode": "WY", "stateName": "Wyoming", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R3", "status": "verified_information", "statusLabel": "Verified information", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "Teton Youth and Family Services currently documents one qualifying functional approach: voluntary first-time juvenile diversion using a Balanced and Restorative Justice process in which youth accept responsibility and repair harm and victims have an active role. That is enough to verify one restorative approach under the live open taxonomy. The reviewed current descriptions do not establish a second meaningfully different participant structure or process; generic restorative-diversion descriptions were not double-counted.", "confidence": "Medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-1157", "src-1158" ] }, { "stateCode": "WY", "stateName": "Wyoming", "category": "Reach", "indicatorId": "R4", "status": "verified_absence", "statusLabel": "Verified absence", "scoreDisplay": "0", "scoreNumeric": 0, "reasoning": "The completed 23-county school-route search found no operational qualifying school-discipline or school-offense restorative diversion pathway.", "confidence": "medium", "sourceIds": [ "src-1151", "src-1152", "src-1153", "src-1154" ] } ]